| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" writes: The FCC doesn't have a mandate to test discipline. Yes, they do. That's what the "character" stuff in the rules is about. I've read the rules many times, but must have missed the part or parts about character testing. There's a local ham around here who has generated so much trouble on various repeaters and earned himself so many warning letters that FCC is considering not renewing his license for "character" reasons. IOW he simply doesn't have the necessary self-discipline to be a ham. First, what does that have to do with testing? Second, there is nothing in the rules about refusing a renewal based on character, so I seriously doubt that would be the FCC's explination for any action like this (a pattern of rule violations, yes). Agreed. But those things do constitute "discipline". Only if you stretch the word to mean something beyond common usage. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||