Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
The written tests which are made from those questions are a govenrment requirement. However, we were discussing the government requirement, not test questions. Because we have not seen any significant changes to the technology used by hams in all that time that came from hams who aren't code tested. Of course not. Radio is a mature technology, so you're not likely to see "significant" changes in the future. But that doesn't suggest for a moment that there are no contributions at all being made. With several hundred thousand hams out there, neither of us are likely to know what contributions are being made. But with all due respect, Dwight - how "technically inclined" are you? Build any homebrew rigs? Any new modes or technologies? Any technical articles in amateur radio publications? Are these what determines who is technically inclined? If so, I doubt 99% of the operators today, in any license class, could be described that way. I use modern radio equipment, far beyond what could be built easily at home. New modes were rare even before any changes to the code tests and may be even more rare in the future. And new technologies will obviously be small in a mature industry. As for my own activities, I'll refrain beyond saying I've built some lessor equipment at home, written some articles, and helped to establish policies for the use of amateur equipment within a national organization. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |