| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote That way, no one who was interested would be forced off the air, but at the same time there would be incentive to get a full-privs renewable license. If, after 10 years as a learner and exposed to mainstream ham radio they can't qualify for a standard license, then another 10 years isn't likely to be sufficient to become qualified. I can't imagine "one who was interested" would fail to qualify in 10 years, but if they didn't, well I guess there are other hobbies like finger painting which might be less challenging and not require a federal license to pursue. The liberals will whine and wring their hands in dismay, but life's a bitch sometimes. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||