"Bert Craig" wrote:

(snip) The discussion I was engaged
in w/Bill, K2UNK, concerned the
"character" aspect of Morse code
testing. (snip)

(snip) Well Dwight, the above is the
issue that Bill, JEP, Kim, Jim, and I
were discussing. Get it yet?


However, I wasn't discussing anything with Bill, Jep, Kim, or you. I
responded to something Jim had said and we had exchanged several messages on
that subject (with the subject clearly stated).


I do notice that this is not the first
(or tenth, for that matter) time you've
joined into a thread, (or a branch
thereof) pulled the subject in a
different direction, and then whined
about a response by claiming that
what you said had nothing to do
with a "separate" issue.


In case you haven't noticed, the subject you're discussing isn't the
subject listed in the subject line of this thread. The subject you're
discussing spun off from that original discussion, as the subject Jim and I
were discussing spun off from yours. That's fairly typical of newsgroup
discussions. Therefore, I think it's fairly important to know what is being
discussed before making comments, especially comments about the participants
(not the subject, but the participants - you said, "Kim's got it, (snip)
Bill's got it too, (snip) Dwight No comment."). Enough said.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/