| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote Okay, Dee, show me where I said Amateurs "must" do public service. your words we "...There is nothing in part 95 that mandates public service like that found in part 97." tr.v. man·dat·ed, man·dat·ing, man·dates 1. To assign (a colony or territory) to a specified nation under a mandate. 2. To make mandatory, as by law; decree or requi mandated desegregation of public schools. The way you have used the word conforms to usage number 2. Therefore, you have stated that public service is required even though that may not be what you meant to say. I don't have time to waste on this, Dee. You know what Part 97 says, and what it means (and therefore what I meant). A more complete definition of "mandate" is... Noun: mandate ('man'deyt) 1. A document giving an official instruction or command 2. A territory surrendered by Turkey or Germany after World War I and inhabited by people not yet able to stand by themselves and so put under the tutelage of some other European power 3. (politics) the commission that is given to a government and its policies through an electoral victory Verb: mandate (man'deyt) 1. Assign under a mandate; of nations 2. Assign authority to I used mandate in the context that Part 97 assigns authority to Ham radio operators to perform public service through ARES, community organizations, and so on. There is nothing like that in Part 95. Obviously, there is nothing in "assigns authority to" that is required. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message .net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote: "Dwight Stewart" wrote Okay, Dee, show me where I said Amateurs "must" do public service. your words we "...There is nothing in part 95 that mandates public service like that found in part 97." tr.v. man·dat·ed, man·dat·ing, man·dates 1. To assign (a colony or territory) to a specified nation under a mandate. 2. To make mandatory, as by law; decree or requi mandated desegregation of public schools. The way you have used the word conforms to usage number 2. Therefore, you have stated that public service is required even though that may not be what you meant to say. I don't have time to waste on this, Dee. You know what Part 97 says, and what it means (and therefore what I meant). A more complete definition of "mandate" is... Noun: mandate ('man'deyt) 1. A document giving an official instruction or command 2. A territory surrendered by Turkey or Germany after World War I and inhabited by people not yet able to stand by themselves and so put under the tutelage of some other European power 3. (politics) the commission that is given to a government and its policies through an electoral victory Verb: mandate (man'deyt) 1. Assign under a mandate; of nations 2. Assign authority to I used mandate in the context that Part 97 assigns authority to Ham radio operators to perform public service through ARES, community organizations, and so on. There is nothing like that in Part 95. Obviously, there is nothing in "assigns authority to" that is required. Your usage is still incorrect. There is nothing in Part 97 that assigns authority to hams to do public service either. I've read part 97 from beginning to end. Also there was no reason to include noun definitions when working with the verb. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote: Your usage is still incorrect. There is nothing in Part 97 that assigns authority to hams to do public service either. I've read part 97 from beginning to end. (snip) Then you either cannot read or cannot understand what you've read. Regardless, if you truly feel Part 97 does not authorize us to do public service, then I simply don't have the time to convince you otherwise. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message k.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote: Your usage is still incorrect. There is nothing in Part 97 that assigns authority to hams to do public service either. I've read part 97 from beginning to end. (snip) Then you either cannot read or cannot understand what you've read. Regardless, if you truly feel Part 97 does not authorize us to do public service, then I simply don't have the time to convince you otherwise. Since no one is prohibited from doing public service, no authorization is needed. However, if one wishes to use ham frequencies, they have to have license but that is an authorization to operate specified frequencies not an authorization to do public service. If you will read 97.1, Basis and Purpose, it only lists recognition of and encouragement of public service as one part of the basis and purpose. That does not confer any type of mandate or authorization to the amateur to do public service. It is a recognition of what we do and the value of what we do. It is a good and solid justification to use for the continued existence of amateur radio. Nothing more. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint wrote:
Since no one is prohibited from doing public service, no authorization is needed. (snip) To do the types of public service we're authorized to do (MARS, RACES, and so on), authorization is required. Sec. 97.407 (a) No station may transmit in RACES unless it is an FCC-licensed primary, club, or military recreation station and it is certified by a civil defense organization as registered with that organization, or it is an FCC-licensed RACES station. (snip) Care to show me where Part 95 authorizes CB'ers to operate a station at all similar to a RACES station? What about a MARS station? What about operations serving government agencies and others? In fact, show me where Part 95 authorizes any activity beyond the recreational use of those frequencies. (snip) It is a recognition of what we do and the value of what we do. It is a good and solid justification to use for the continued existence of amateur radio. Nothing more. Sadly, far too many in Amateur Radio today have that attitude towards public service. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message k.net... "Dee D. Flint wrote: Since no one is prohibited from doing public service, no authorization is needed. (snip) To do the types of public service we're authorized to do (MARS, RACES, and so on), authorization is required. Sec. 97.407 (a) No station may transmit in RACES unless it is an FCC-licensed primary, club, or military recreation station and it is certified by a civil defense organization as registered with that organization, or it is an FCC-licensed RACES station. (snip) Care to show me where Part 95 authorizes CB'ers to operate a station at all similar to a RACES station? What about a MARS station? What about operations serving government agencies and others? In fact, show me where Part 95 authorizes any activity beyond the recreational use of those frequencies. That is an authorization to operate on those frequencies and an authorization to operate the station not an authorization to do public service. There is a difference. And to do MARS or CAP, it is not the FCC that authorizes you but other agencies and services. But I repeat that is authorization to use the frequencies not authorization to do public service. RACES is the same way. You have to be authorized for RACES operation but that is not the same as authorizing one to do public service. RACES is a very specific organization with very specific goals and tasks. You do not and never have needed an authorization to do public service. Where in the rules does it say that I need the FCC's authorization to do communications at a walk-a-thon? Where in the rules does it state that I need FCC's authorization to be part of the team that deployed here in the Michigan area during the August power blackout? Where in the rules does it say that I need the FCC's authorization to join ARES. Nowhere. The list could go on and on. (snip) It is a recognition of what we do and the value of what we do. It is a good and solid justification to use for the continued existence of amateur radio. Nothing more. Sadly, far too many in Amateur Radio today have that attitude towards public service. Most of do follow the personal commitment to participate in public service since it is not only a long and time honored tradition but the right thing to do. That does not change the fact that there is no mandate to do so. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article om, "Dee D.
Flint" writes: "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message nk.net... "Dee D. Flint wrote: Since no one is prohibited from doing public service, no authorization is needed. (snip) To do the types of public service we're authorized to do (MARS, RACES, and so on), authorization is required. Sec. 97.407 (a) No station may transmit in RACES unless it is an FCC-licensed primary, club, or military recreation station and it is certified by a civil defense organization as registered with that organization, or it is an FCC-licensed RACES station. (snip) Care to show me where Part 95 authorizes CB'ers to operate a station at all similar to a RACES station? What about a MARS station? What about operations serving government agencies and others? In fact, show me where Part 95 authorizes any activity beyond the recreational use of those frequencies. That is an authorization to operate on those frequencies and an authorization to operate the station not an authorization to do public service. There is a difference. And to do MARS or CAP, it is not the FCC that authorizes you but other agencies and services. But I repeat that is authorization to use the frequencies not authorization to do public service. RACES is the same way. You have to be authorized for RACES operation but that is not the same as authorizing one to do public service. RACES is a very specific organization with very specific goals and tasks. You do not and never have needed an authorization to do public service. Where in the rules does it say that I need the FCC's authorization to do communications at a walk-a-thon? Where in the rules does it state that I need FCC's authorization to be part of the team that deployed here in the Michigan area during the August power blackout? Where in the rules does it say that I need the FCC's authorization to join ARES. Nowhere. The list could go on and on. (snip) It is a recognition of what we do and the value of what we do. It is a good and solid justification to use for the continued existence of amateur radio. Nothing more. Sadly, far too many in Amateur Radio today have that attitude towards public service. Most of do follow the personal commitment to participate in public service since it is not only a long and time honored tradition but the right thing to do. That does not change the fact that there is no mandate to do so. Right...and folks who ain't got no ham license or morse code test passings don't do the right thing and are bad citizens. Hoo hah... WMD |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote: To do the types of public service we're authorized to do (MARS, RACES, and so on), authorization is required. Sec. 97.407 (snip) That is an authorization to operate on those frequencies and an authorization to operate the station not an authorization to do public service. (snip) "That is authorization to operate on those frequencies" to do what, Dee? The only answer is "public service" in this context. When it comes to Amateur Radio, we perform our public service using the Amateur Radio frequencies. And the FCC is the governing agency that says what is authorized on those frequencies (not everything is - your license is not a blank check to do what you want with the Amateur frequencies). For example, when it comes to the walk-a-thon you mentioned, the FCC has set rules on what is and isn't authorized in that situation. The same with your power blackout situation. And the same with ARES. In other words, you are only allowed to use your radio in situations authorized, and in the manner authorized. One situation authorized is public service. (snip) That does not change the fact that there is no mandate to do so. Again, the words mandate and authorization are synonymous. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article t, Dwight Stewart
says... "Dee D. Flint" wrote: Your usage is still incorrect. There is nothing in Part 97 that assigns authority to hams to do public service either. I've read part 97 from beginning to end. (snip) Then you either cannot read or cannot understand what you've read. Regardless, if you truly feel Part 97 does not authorize us to do public service, then I simply don't have the time to convince you otherwise. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Isn't that special, a vanity call for a no code dummy. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
WA3MOJ wrote in message ...
Isn't that special, a vanity call for a no code dummy. Another class A jerk. Not so special. Plenty of 'em in amateur radio. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||