Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
N2EY wrote: In article t, "KØHB" writes: "N2EY" wrote So when you gonna send that proposal to the FCC? I already did (as you knew perfectly well). But only as a comment to another's proposal, not as a stand-alone petition. Hopefully Hans has a ready supply of replies for the FCC to use when people comment on his petition. So far, Hans has sent in his ideas only as a comment to others' petitions and proposals, Mike. He hasn't sent FCC a petition or proposal to FCC. It just won't seem right to comment on it there without being called stupid...oops, I mean novel! ;^) I think that if Hans was really serious about his proposal, he'd send it off to FCC just like the other 14 petitioners recently did. I say this because it is highly doubtful that the major and unique features of his proposal would be adopted by any other group such as ARRL, NCVEC, or NCI. It is also highly doubtful that his proposal, when submitted as a comment, would have nearly so much effect nor gather nearly so much attention as if submitted as a proposal. If and when Hans did submit it as a petition, FCC would then most probably assign it an RM number and take comments and reply comments on it. Which I sense is a process that Hans wants to avoid, because there are bound to be both supporting and opposing comments. It would be fascinating to see the reactions.... But it's Hans ideas and therefore his call as to whetehr to submit it or not. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |