Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message k.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote: Your usage is still incorrect. There is nothing in Part 97 that assigns authority to hams to do public service either. I've read part 97 from beginning to end. (snip) Then you either cannot read or cannot understand what you've read. Regardless, if you truly feel Part 97 does not authorize us to do public service, then I simply don't have the time to convince you otherwise. Since no one is prohibited from doing public service, no authorization is needed. However, if one wishes to use ham frequencies, they have to have license but that is an authorization to operate specified frequencies not an authorization to do public service. If you will read 97.1, Basis and Purpose, it only lists recognition of and encouragement of public service as one part of the basis and purpose. That does not confer any type of mandate or authorization to the amateur to do public service. It is a recognition of what we do and the value of what we do. It is a good and solid justification to use for the continued existence of amateur radio. Nothing more. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |