Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "N2EY" wrote Which I sense is a process that Hans wants to avoid, because there are bound to be both supporting and opposing comments. Avoid????? What a strange thought process, coming from someone who seems to be familiar with my participation here on rrap. Do I appear bashful about stating my ideas, and avoiding reactions to them? The field is currently crowded with at least 14 petitions, and ARRL will likely make it 15. Would you like a petition of yours to be buried in that noise level? Timing, Jim, is EVERYTHING, and introducing another petition at this time would NOT be a way of gaining any significant mindshare from the rulemakers. So what is your likly timetable for submission? After an ARRL submission? If yes, how soon after? There is a risk of submitting beyond a point where the FCC has already digested the 14 or probably will be 15 submissions and then posts a NPRM. By that time any new proposals aren't likly to get any attention...IMHO. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article et, "Bill Sohl"
writes: So what is your likly timetable for submission? After an ARRL submission? If yes, how soon after? Bill, I think that the answer to all of the above questions is: "When Hans thinks the time is right" There is a risk of submitting beyond a point where the FCC has already digested the 14 or probably will be 15 submissions and then posts a NPRM. By that time any new proposals aren't likly to get any attention...IMHO. Agreed! But that's included in the above answer. I'm not speaking for Hans - the above answers are IMHO. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |