Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Leo" wrote:
The belief that a mandate for amateur radio to participate in public service communications is quite common - just did a quick search on Google, and II have attached an ARRL reference as well as one amateur radio club, who both clearly call it a "mandate". No, the real problem is that some simply don't understand the full meaning of the word "mandate." They feel there is some kind of requirement behind it. So, of course, they get confused when it is used in a non-required context. However, there is no requirements associated associated with the other senses of the word. For example, the president can be given a mandate by the voters to lower taxes, but there is no requirement to do so. Amateur Radio operators have a mandate to perform public service (it's in the basis and purpose of this radio service), but there is no requirement to do so. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |