About Us

October 24th 04, 12:49 AM

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: operator's licence vs. station licence
From: (William)
Date: 10/22/2004 7:15 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

1. Nope. Just a straight clip of what Kelly and Micolis exchanged in
RRAP. "Don't blame me, I'm only the messenger," another PCTA once
told me. Hi!

2. Sure.

3. Sure.

4. He's in denial. You're still getting the attributions wrong. Hi!

5. I use Google. I read one thread at a time, and respond as
appropriate. Too bad.

6. You did not apologize with the intent of sorrow or remorse. Your
so called apology was very narrowly focused, merely buying you time
while you continue to check out all other possible avenues for calling
Hans a liar. I think you even called Hans "slimy." Hi!

1. Still doesn't change the "message", whichg has nothing to do with YOUR
assertion that "numerous Extras" thumb their noses at lower class operators.
You still haven't provided a single valid quote.

See how you twist everything?

There aren't even "numerous" hams on RRAP, so why would I say
"numerous???

Idiot.

2. Yep.

3. Yep.

4. No, I'm not.

Yes, you do, and yes, you are.

5. It doesn't matter WHERE you post from...the FACT remains that your
post was several HOURS after the initial exchange occured. You had more than
adequate time to read the posts before trying to weasle your way into yet
another feeble rant.

Feeble apology.

6. "Sorrow or remorse"....No. Sincere apology for having got the
attribute on the article's true origin, yes.

Not -even- that. You merely apologised for getting the magazine
citation wrong.

Your accusation of plagiarism stands.

"Sorrow or remorse" is for the death of a relative or friend, or backing
ovr one of the kid's bikes.

And when it comes to "buying time", YOU are the master of that...We've
waited almost four years now for some proof of the validity of your alleged
Somalia operation, and it's been almost a year now since your silly "Unlicensed
devices" rants. If I take a week to get a response from ARRL to determine the
nature of the article that I recall, "SO WHAT...?!?!

So your accusation of plagiarism stands. You apologized for the wrong
thing, which is what makes your "sincere" apology completely
worthless.

I've already proven you wrong on your assertion that I allegedly never say
I am sorry or acknowledge an error. Done that in the last 24 hours. Still no
apology from YOU for it...Just some lame "you really didn't mean it" claim.

The accusation was one of plagiarism, not which magazine it was
published in. Your "sincere" apology over the incorrect citation is
completely meaningless.

Seems it was good enough for Hans, the aggrieved one in this case, to
accept it.

He was in such shock that you actually apologized he almost missed
your insincerity. Then he said he was waiting for the rest of the
apology, (the part about plagiarism).

It's just as well...If you HAD done it I'd be in ICU with a stroke at this
very moment!

Steve, K4YZ

If that's all it would take I'd lie and make an apology right now.
But you're the one lying, so your promise of a stroke will just have
to wait. Hi, hi!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
RILEY SAYS K1MAN BROADCASTS ARE LEGAL	Dave Welby	Policy	28	August 31st 04 01:59 AM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004	private	General	0	May 10th 04 09:39 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617	Tedd Mirgliotta	Dx	0	July 6th 03 10:10 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617	Tedd Mirgliotta	Dx	0	July 6th 03 10:10 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617	Tedd Mirgliotta	General	0	July 6th 03 10:10 PM

Menu

About Us