Subject: Cheap Shot Robeslob...Why Is No One Surprised?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 10/21/2004 9:44 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


You still haven't explained your actions, Hans.


What "actions"?

You're the one who opened the incident with an accusation of
plagiarization, yet when I defend myself against that slimy charge you
wring your hands in self-righteous dismay.

Defending yourself...to Rich?

When absolutely NO MENTION of you, RRAP, or the intended use of the request
was, Hans?

What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU about...?!?!

It was YOUR slimy attempt to divert Rich's attention from assisting me,
Hans.

It was YOUR "self righteous" hand wringing that we are talking about.

My offer stands, Steve. Cite the CQ issue which contained this story,
not written by me, and I'll send a public apology "Letter to the Editor"
to CQ.

Not necessary, Hans.

I have already posted the letter that Rich sent to both of us and
apologized to you for having gotten the attribute vis-a-vis the medium that I
thought it was in.

Put up or shut up. It's really THAT simple.

I've already been "on the move", Hans.

Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.

Try being a man about it, Hans.

It really is THAT simple.

36, de Hans, K0HB

Un-sincere as always. Thanks for proving me right...again...

Steve, K4YZ

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU
about...?!?!


To assist him in searching for the article. I presumed if he had a
vertaim copy it would be much easier to locate the issue it was
published in. Unfortunately (for you) his search was not successful.


Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong
about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

36, de Hans, K0HB

Subject: Cheap Shot Robeslob...Why Is No One Surprised?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 10/21/2004 11:30 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: et

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote

What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU
about...?!?!

To assist him in searching for the article. I presumed if he had a
vertaim copy it would be much easier to locate the issue it was
published in. Unfortunately (for you) his search was not successful.

What part of MY letter was so insufficient as to preclude him from finding
what I was looking for?

Allow me to answer that for you...

NOTHING.

Your letter added NOTHING to what I had already included in my letter.

It's ONLY intent was to spread the flamefest outside the NG in order to
sate your wounded ego.

Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong
about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.

No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

Perhaps because you've got your head so far up your own backside as to be
inable to see beyond your own selfish ego?

36, de Hans, K0HB

Still with the inadequacies.

As usual.

Steve, K4YZ

"KØHB" wrote


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.


The apology has now appeared on my newsreader.

Apology accepted. Thank you.

de Hans, K0HB

Subject: Cheap Shot Robeslob...Why Is No One Surprised?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 10/21/2004 2:33 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net

"KØHB" wrote

No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

The apology has now appeared on my newsreader.

Apology accepted. Thank you.

de Hans, K0HB

And again, you are welcome.

73 de Steve, K4YZ

KØHB wrote:

"KØHB" wrote


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.



The apology has now appeared on my newsreader.

Apology accepted. Thank you.

de Hans, K0HB


Group Hug?


- Mike KB3EIA -

"KØHB" wrote in message ink.net...
"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU
about...?!?!


To assist him in searching for the article. I presumed if he had a
vertaim copy it would be much easier to locate the issue it was
published in. Unfortunately (for you) his search was not successful.


Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong
about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

36, de Hans, K0HB

Hans, I see no apology either.

Meanwhile, Steve is manically exhausting all other avenues before he
has to phase the music. But in the end, I'm sure you'll get your
apology because he's told us before that he admits when he's wrong,
even though I've never seen an apology from him. He's in too deep on
this one to snub you on your justly deserved apology.

Best of Luck.

Hi, hi!

Subject: Cheap Shot Robeslob...Why Is No One Surprised?
From: (William)
Date: 10/21/2004 6:12 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"KØHB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU
about...?!?!


To assist him in searching for the article. I presumed if he had a
vertaim copy it would be much easier to locate the issue it was
published in. Unfortunately (for you) his search was not successful.


Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong
about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

36, de Hans, K0HB

Hans, I see no apology either.

Meanwhile, Steve is manically exhausting all other avenues before he
has to phase the music.

"Face" the music, Brain.

But in the end, I'm sure you'll get your
apology because he's told us before that he admits when he's wrong,
even though I've never seen an apology from him.

You only see what you want to see, Brain.

Obviously Hans saw the apology after reading a little bit. Strange,
though, since he "responded" to posts made AFTER those comments, yet stated he
didn't see those. Oh well...He DID see them and DID respond accordingly.

He's in too deep on
this one to snub you on your justly deserved apology.

You need to ask around, Brain. I have made errors before and was not the
least bit hesitant to come up off of an apology when it was right to do so.

On the otherhand, we're STILL waiting on apologies from you on your
falsely claimed Somalia operation and your failed claim of "Unlicensed devices
play a major role in emergency comms" assertions, even though both of those
have been hanging out there for MONTHS.

How long does it take YOU to make an apology for mistated, untruthful or
errant posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Cheap Shot Robeslob...Why Is No One Surprised?
From: (William)
Date: 10/21/2004 6:12 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"KØHB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU
about...?!?!


To assist him in searching for the article. I presumed if he had a
vertaim copy it would be much easier to locate the issue it was
published in. Unfortunately (for you) his search was not successful.


Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong
about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

36, de Hans, K0HB

Hans, I see no apology either.

Meanwhile, Steve is manically exhausting all other avenues before he
has to phase the music.

"Face" the music, Brain.

Left Face!

Right Face!

About Face!

Two Face!

As you were! (two faced)

Hi, hi!

But in the end, I'm sure you'll get your
apology because he's told us before that he admits when he's wrong,
even though I've never seen an apology from him.

You only see what you want to see, Brain.

I've since seen your apology. Pretty lame stalling tactic while you
have an ARRL Staffer decide if Hans is a liar.

No intergrity is your accusations, and no integrity in your apologies.

Your word isn't woth much.

Hi, hi!

Obviously Hans saw the apology after reading a little bit. Strange,
though, since he "responded" to posts made AFTER those comments, yet stated he
didn't see those. Oh well...He DID see them and DID respond accordingly.

Strange is Steve. Steve is Strange.

He's in too deep on
this one to snub you on your justly deserved apology.

You need to ask around, Brain. I have made errors before and was not the
least bit hesitant to come up off of an apology when it was right to do so.

I'm still waiting.

On the otherhand, we're STILL waiting on apologies from you on your
falsely claimed Somalia operation and your failed claim of "Unlicensed devices
play a major role in emergency comms" assertions, even though both of those
have been hanging out there for MONTHS.

You need an apology for my Somalia operation???

You go to hell.

How long does it take YOU to make an apology for mistated, untruthful or
errant posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

I've apologized to Dee. I thought she was wrong, I -said- she was
wrong, she was not wrong, and I stood corrected. That's how it works.

Yet you want an apology for my having an OPINION???

You're NUTS!

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: Cheap Shot Robeslob...Why Is No One Surprised?
From: (William)
Date: 10/21/2004 6:12 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"KØHB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


What was the purpose of your "head's up" letter to Rich, W2VU
about...?!?!


To assist him in searching for the article. I presumed if he had a
vertaim copy it would be much easier to locate the issue it was
published in. Unfortunately (for you) his search was not successful.


Those "actions", including my apology for having gotten it wrong
about CQ
vis-a-vis another source.


No apology has yet appeared on my newsreader nor in my email inbox.

36, de Hans, K0HB

Hans, I see no apology either.

Meanwhile, Steve is manically exhausting all other avenues before he
has to phase the music.

"Face" the music, Brain.

Left Face!

Right Face!

About Face!

Two Face!

As you were! (two faced)

Hi, hi!

Nursie likes the "cross-order drill" stuff... :-)


But in the end, I'm sure you'll get your
apology because he's told us before that he admits when he's wrong,
even though I've never seen an apology from him.

You only see what you want to see, Brain.

I've since seen your apology. Pretty lame stalling tactic while you
have an ARRL Staffer decide if Hans is a liar.

No intergrity is your accusations, and no integrity in your apologies.

Your word isn't woth much.

Hi, hi!

Nursie doesn't "need" to apologize...she is always right and has
the right to accuse anyone of anything...and does. [nursie is a
code-tested extra and therefore immune from criticism...in her
fantasy world]


Obviously Hans saw the apology after reading a little bit. Strange,
though, since he "responded" to posts made AFTER those comments, yet stated
he
didn't see those. Oh well...He DID see them and DID respond accordingly.

Strange is Steve. Steve is Strange.

Dr. Strangelove, "qualified medical doctor" is one of his personalities.


He's in too deep on
this one to snub you on your justly deserved apology.

You need to ask around, Brain. I have made errors before and was not
the
least bit hesitant to come up off of an apology when it was right to do so.

I'm still waiting.

We can wait until hell freezes over, but there won't be any sincere
apologies seen...and there WILL be other threads started with the
obvious personal insults directed to others such as his "Cheap Shot
Brokeslob."


On the otherhand, we're STILL waiting on apologies from you on your
falsely claimed Somalia operation and your failed claim of "Unlicensed
devices
play a major role in emergency comms" assertions, even though both of those
have been hanging out there for MONTHS.

You need an apology for my Somalia operation???

You go to hell.

He's been there...and got medically discharged...


How long does it take YOU to make an apology for mistated, untruthful
or
errant posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

I've apologized to Dee. I thought she was wrong, I -said- she was
wrong, she was not wrong, and I stood corrected. That's how it works.

Yet you want an apology for my having an OPINION???

You're NUTS!

Cashews...but without the cash.