Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Brian Kelly wrote: Been busy around here for a couple days . . . I know there have been a number of such efforts over the years as published in QST but I don't remember the details. I've posted a project I'm getting started that will go a long way toward making us look good and helpful and relevant. Wanna help? Maybe I'll bite. What's up? A near space Science project, such as I outlined to Jim, is a great way for Hams to get involved in a whole lot of fun, and a bit of work, but that can be fun too. Essentially we are building and launching "almost satellites". This is a balloon launched payload that heads to around 100,000 feet or so, conducting experiments for the duration. The experiments can be just about anything you can think of that can be done at that altitude. Most launches are multi-mission, with both science and Ham fun stuff on board. And of course the Ham fun can be scientific too. Hams have had fun ballooning for quite a while, but the advent of inexpensive GPS has changed things dramatically. We now fully expect to get our payloads back! That wasn't the case not too many years ago. The balloon is usually one of the latex weather balloon variety. Zero pressure balloons can be used too, but since they are designed to go up and stay up for a long time, that would be a more complex proposition. The payload uses Amateur radio for command and control. At the heart of the system is a GPS unit in conjunction with a packet radio. The telemetry data is sent back to earth and kept track of with a computer. The computer lets us know where the payload is, where it is going and how fast, and predicts the landing site. Oh, and it's freeware. In addition, the packet radio can send back other info as the mission may desire. The mission is often controlled by a microprocessor. To date, a lot of balloonatics use basic stamp controllers. Whoa: I'm not trying to pee on your parade here Mike, honest, but let's take a look at a few immutable physical realities. Temperatures at 100,000 MSL generally range from -50ºF to -150ºF "depending". Lightweight (ounces) high-end ($500 class) consumer-level GPS receivers are rated to temps only down to غ-5ºF and 30,000 MSL max. altitude. Then comes the same kinds of limits on the rest of the electronics you're visualizing. How would engineer your way around these limitations on a freeware budget? Often a repeater is put on board. A small one has a lot of coverage at 100,000 feet! There is usually a VHF beacon, and occasionally a 10 meter beacon also, although that is not as prevalent as it was before GPS. The experiments vary. One of the favorite devices for the grade and middle school kids is something called a pongsat. This is an experiment that can be anything that will fit inside a ping-pong ball. Sounds weird, but there are plenty of small scale experiments that fit the bill... er, ping-pong ball. The balloon lifts the payload to the predetermined altitude, and bursts. The payload drops, and the Ham comms can continue during descent, although the first few moments after burst can be pretty weird as the payload often does some pretty strange gyrations until the parachute can grab some atmosphere. Drops like the proverbial rock. All this time, the GPS is keeping track of the whereabouts of the payload. Then at landing, it turns into a foxhunt as the hams use the beacon transmissions to find the payload. With the advent of us getting used to the software and the precision with which the GPS can determine the location, it is not too uncommon for the recovery team to witness the landing. From 100,000 the load could easily land downwind a hundred or more miles away from the launch site. Launch of one of these things does not take as much bureaucratic red tape as most people think. The bureaucrats ain't gonna allow a shot to 100,000 and back down anywhere east of the Mississippi for obvious reasons and sure as hell not in PA which leaves me out. You're talking a western badlands proving grounds level experiment. Good luck with the red tape they'll smack you with. How much would you budget for liability insurance? And it can be done for surprisingly little money. .. . . What's your definition of "surprisingly little money"? ..... from WHO? The people that are needed are of course Hams, and people with some programming experience. People with experience building things, and a meteorologist can't hurt! People that don't mind a drive on a weekend day to serve on the recovery team. Plenty of subteams, such as payload, publicity, science, visualization, integration, education liaison. Even people that might just want to feed all the other reprobates. This is real stuff. This might spark the interest in science in some youngster. And that is not only a career choice, but a service to the country. American scientists are becoming pretty rare. Its great publicity for Amateur radio. And we can innovate and experiment. Radio is a pretty mature science now. It's doubtful that any of us are going to invent a grand new communication scheme, or an antenna that does DC to daylight, or even one that is a whole lot better than what we have now. So What we need to do is to integrate what we have now, and do some innovation with it. We also need (or at least should) prove our worth to the community. That we can do it while having fun is a real bonus. Bag this 100,000 foot thing, you're 'way over your head with it. You're vision is doable assuming a more reasonable altitude goal as has already been demonstrated by others. I suggest you pick their brains and find out how they pulled it off and add some untried new twists of your own. - mike KB3EIA - w3rv |