N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

It's been pointed out to you that the FCC maintains certain
"character" requirements for licensure. They are (obviously) not
as
strict for Amateur Radio since you remain a Commission licensee.

Character quifications had nothing to do with it GI JOE.

Who's "GI Joe"...???

And yes, character is very much a part of FCC licensure,
especially in the broadcast services.

The FCC Low
Power TV division in the Mass Media Bureau wasn't posting the filing
windows like their suppose to, that's what it comes down to. I
suggest
you and your buddies on here stick with ham radio. At any rate the
FCC
may consider waivers at anytime and courts have gone farther to say
"the FCC MUST consider waivers" regardless if they are in a filing
window or not. again I suggest you and your buddies stick with ham
radio.

Then I suggest YOU take your silly diatribe to
"alt.wannabe.broadcaster.abusing.ham.radio", Todd...Other than the
obvious abuse of priviledge, your rantings have nothing to do with
Amateur Radio.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...??? Because you're an incometent idiot who
hasn't
met the criteria for licensure?

So What? are you saying people mentally handicap can't or shouldn't
give a license, because if the FCC IS doing that it is a violation of
ADA (American Disabilities Act)and I'll be sure to past that on to
the
Telecommunications Sub Committee. I'll be the first one to file a
lawsuit against the FCC.

Toddie, Toddie, Toddie...

You try to toggle "incompetence" with "handicap". They are NOT
the same.

Steven Hawking, for example, has one of the most severe physical
handicaps ever known to man, but he is eminently competent in all other
respects.

You, on the otherhand, have all of the physical facilities a
"normal" human being enjoys, however cannot understand even simple
regulatory process or express yourself "effectively" without liberal
use of profanity and insult.

E V E R Y rule, regulation and statute of law at every level
requires that a person be "competent" in order to be a functioning
citizen.

Incompetence IS a legally defensible EXCLUSION from cerain rights
and priviledges of citizenship, INCLUDING licensure by the Federal
Communications Commission.

Since you've apparently admitted that you ARE incompetent, Todd,
perhaps we should make sure that a copy of this exchange makes it to
any public hearing wherein your application for a broadcast license is
subject.

And we can include a copy of your "The FCC is Slime" diatribe from
your "blog". It would certainly lend credence to the argument that you
would be an enforcement risk if a broadcast license were issued to you.

You certainly take liberties with Amateur regulations. What makes
anyone believe you'll comply with commercial ones?

You're violating the regulations of the one radio service you
ARE
a licensee in...WHY in Heaven's name would they waste valuable
COMMERCIAL spectrum on an idiot who can't adhere to AMATEUR
regulations...???

Violating what regulation? as for a I know I've been licensed sinced
1991-1992 and have not once gotten a fine or a warning letter.

I go 70MPH on the freeway in places where it's marked 65MPH and
never gotten a speeding ticket.

So what?

In my
opinion G.I. JOE you don't know what the #### your talking about.

(1) Who is "GI Joe"...???

(2) P L E A S E don't tell me this vaunted college you're about
to graduate from is bestowing a degree in English upon you, Todd,
because your comprehension, construction and application suck.

You're a prime example of why this nation is in dire straits...Our
schools, primary, secondary and post graduate, are failing.

I'd be humiliated to be a member of the Board of the institution
about to bestow ANY level degree upon a person who can't express
themselves more effectively than what you've demonstrated here.

You're going to try and beat the FCC at a game wherein they
already have DECADES of case law in thier favor, not to mention a
bank
of lawyers who will still be earning federal wages long after this
episode is over with and you're flipping burgers to pay off the
bankruptcy.

I have a little bit more money and power then what you think G.I.
JOE,
So keep lying to yourself.

Who's "G.I. Joe"...???

And you obviously have squat for "power" since you have to resort
to broadcasting via Amateur Radio rather than with the appropriate
commercial licnese, Todd.

As for money...well...if you had spent your (imaginary) funds on a
decent communication's lawyer, you would, in all likelyhood, already
have the broadcast license you so passionately covet.

Instead, you resort to a pontificating, self-promoting "blog" that
is verbally abusive, insulting, and absolutely innefective and useless
for obtaining said licensure. It is, in fact, counter productive to
it.

The only person lying to themselves here, Todd, is you.

Enjoy. It's your fantasy.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

It's been pointed out to you that the FCC maintains certain
"character" requirements for licensure. They are (obviously) not
as
strict for Amateur Radio since you remain a Commission licensee.

Character quifications had nothing to do with it GI JOE.

Who's "GI Joe"...???

And yes, character is very much a part of FCC licensure,
especially in the broadcast services.

Well your wrong, the ONLY reason the FCC dismissed the applications
were because they weren't filed during the Filing Window. If you want I
post the cover letter on my webpage and you read it for
yourself...that's if you can read.



The FCC Low
Power TV division in the Mass Media Bureau wasn't posting the
filing
windows like their suppose to, that's what it comes down to. I
suggest
you and your buddies on here stick with ham radio. At any rate the
FCC
may consider waivers at anytime and courts have gone farther to say
"the FCC MUST consider waivers" regardless if they are in a filing
window or not. again I suggest you and your buddies stick with ham
radio.

Then I suggest YOU take your silly diatribe to
"alt.wannabe.broadcaster.abusing.ham.radio", Todd...Other than the
obvious abuse of priviledge, your rantings have nothing to do with
Amateur Radio.

No but you loosers have to deal with it.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...??? Because you're an incometent idiot who
hasn't
met the criteria for licensure?

So What? are you saying people mentally handicap can't or shouldn't
give a license, because if the FCC IS doing that it is a violation
of
ADA (American Disabilities Act)and I'll be sure to past that on to
the
Telecommunications Sub Committee. I'll be the first one to file a
lawsuit against the FCC.

Toddie, Toddie, Toddie...

You try to toggle "incompetence" with "handicap". They are NOT
the same.

Steven Hawking, for example, has one of the most severe physical
handicaps ever known to man, but he is eminently competent in all
other
respects.

There is a difference between physical handicap and mental
handicap...Hawkings as you stated above has a Physical Handicap.

You, on the otherhand, have all of the physical facilities a
"normal" human being enjoys, however cannot understand even simple
regulatory process or express yourself "effectively" without liberal
use of profanity and insult.

E V E R Y rule, regulation and statute of law at every level
requires that a person be "competent" in order to be a functioning
citizen.

Incompetence IS a legally defensible EXCLUSION from cerain
rights
and priviledges of citizenship, INCLUDING licensure by the Federal
Communications Commission.

OH STEVE, THERE YOU GO AGAIN SAYING I'M IN VIOLATION OTHE
RULES.....YET, HAVE YOU HEARD MY BULLETINS????

Since you've apparently admitted that you ARE incompetent, Todd,
perhaps we should make sure that a copy of this exchange makes it to
any public hearing wherein your application for a broadcast license
is
subject.
NO, I JUST LIKE ASSHOLES WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THE MENTALLY ILL

And we can include a copy of your "The FCC is Slime" diatribe
from
your "blog". It would certainly lend credence to the argument that
you
would be an enforcement risk if a broadcast license were issued to
you.

Turst me, i've called the FCC a lot worst to their faces.

You certainly take liberties with Amateur regulations. What
makes
anyone believe you'll comply with commercial ones?

You're violating the regulations of the one radio service
you
ARE
a licensee in...WHY in Heaven's name would they waste valuable
COMMERCIAL spectrum on an idiot who can't adhere to AMATEUR
regulations...???

Violating what regulation? as for a I know I've been licensed
sinced
1991-1992 and have not once gotten a fine or a warning letter.

I go 70MPH on the freeway in places where it's marked 65MPH and
never gotten a speeding ticket.

no my point is your Claiming i'm violating the rules yet you don't have
the balls to back up your statement. yet, you've never heard my
transmission, nor, do you have the balls to explain what rules I'm
"suppose" to be violation. i have two forums here and my blog which you
can make your case yet you fail to do so.

So what?

In my
opinion G.I. JOE you don't know what the #### your talking about.

(1) Who is "GI Joe"...???

(2) P L E A S E don't tell me this vaunted college you're
about
to graduate from is bestowing a degree in English upon you, Todd,
because your comprehension, construction and application suck.

You're a prime example of why this nation is in dire
straits...Our
schools, primary, secondary and post graduate, are failing.

I'd be humiliated to be a member of the Board of the institution
about to bestow ANY level degree upon a person who can't express
themselves more effectively than what you've demonstrated here.

You're going to try and beat the FCC at a game wherein they
already have DECADES of case law in thier favor, not to mention a
bank
of lawyers who will still be earning federal wages long after
this
episode is over with and you're flipping burgers to pay off the
bankruptcy.

I have a little bit more money and power then what you think G.I.
JOE,
So keep lying to yourself.

Who's "G.I. Joe"...???

And you obviously have squat for "power" since you have to
resort
to broadcasting via Amateur Radio rather than with the appropriate
commercial licnese, Todd.

As for money...well...if you had spent your (imaginary) funds on
a
decent communication's lawyer, you would, in all likelyhood, already
have the broadcast license you so passionately covet.

Instead, you resort to a pontificating, self-promoting "blog"
that
is verbally abusive, insulting, and absolutely innefective and
useless
for obtaining said licensure. It is, in fact, counter productive to
it.

The only person lying to themselves here, Todd, is you.

Enjoy. It's your fantasy.

Steve, K4YZ

Sorry...coorection

NO, I JUST DONT LIKE ASSHOLES WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THE MENTALLY ILL

N9OGL wrote:
Sorry...coorection

NO, I JUST DONT LIKE ASSHOLES WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THE MENTALLY
ILL

What's a "coorection"...?!?!

Who's discriminating against the mentally ill?

Steve, K4YZ

You know steve, your an asshole, who ever gave you the title
"HAM-RADIO" needs to be shot. because frankly you don't deserve that
title. As for my writing skills, as I've probably stated before I'm not
a writer. but I sure as hell can write a lot better then some amateurs
around here.. Hell, some of letter's In the past that I've got from the
FCC when they responded to a question was a hell of lot worse then what
I write. FInally I think people who keep bitching about someone writing
skills are trying to envade the questions being asked. Now I know your
probably going to say, well if the person could write so we could
understand them....well read the unstructured text and try to make
sense of it....or is it too much like work.... have fun on t newsgroup
Mr "Hate Radio"

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
You know steve, your an ###hole, who ever gave you the title
"HAM-RADIO" needs to be shot.

No one ever "gave" me ANY title, Toddie. I've earned each and
every "title" that I've ever used...United States Marine, Private
Pilot, Nurse, Paramedic, Amateur Radio licensee...

Unlike SOME people who sign documents as the "CEO" of non-existant
companies and organizations, using ficticious last names, etc...

because frankly you don't deserve that title.

If you mean "licensed Amateur Radio operator", sure I deserve it.
Passed the legally required tests, including the 20WPM code test.

And I passed them "BB"..."Before Bash".

As for my writing skills, as I've probably stated before I'm not
a writer.

That's obvious.

Nor are you a professional broadcaster, engineer, inventor,
lawyer, etc, but you try to impress us with how competent you allegedly
are in all those disciplines. The evidence to the contrary is glaring.

You don't have to have an advanced degree in English to be
reasonably competent, Todd. It just scares the bee-jeebers out of me
that some post-secondary institution in Illinois is allgedly granting
you a degree, and yet you are now no more competent in English than you
were on Day One of Kindergarten.

You're the proof that the end-product of many of our educational
institutions is woefully incompetent in basic social and educational
skills.

but I sure as hell can write a lot better then some amateurs
around here..

Uhhhhhh...No, you're actually WORSE than most in here. And unless
Mark I-Am-A-Drafted-Gay-Pagan-Chemical-Corps-Colonel Morgan, KB9RQZ,
returns to the fray, YOU'RE it!

You should to a Google on Mark's past postings herein and see what
REALLY terrible can be! (You're not that far off, though...)

Hell, some of letter's In the past that I've got from the
FCC when they responded to a question was a hell of lot worse then
what
I write.

Now you're blatantly lying. I DARE you to scan and post the
letters on your blogs or other publically accessible website.

Now...don't get me wrong...I don't doubt that you didn't
understand what was being said in the letters, however that doesn't
make them worse than anything YOU have written!

Todd...You're borderline incompetent with the written English
language...And considering you're "in college" and have the resources
of spellcheckers, etc, there's no excuse for it.

Everyone, including me, makes occassional typos. Oh well.

You, on the otherhand, make it an Olympic sport. But you'd still
only make the Silver or Bronze...Mark pretty well had the Gold tied up!

FInally I think people who keep bitching about someone writing
skills are trying to envade the questions being asked.

But I'm not the one evading anything, Todd.

Now I know your
probably going to say, well if the person could write so we could
understand them....well read the unstructured text and try to make
sense of it....or is it too much like work....

It's not my responsibility to make YOU legible or understood, Todd.
Nor is it my job to understand your frequent lapses into complete
gibberish.

If you want to be understood, take the time to express yourself
effectively and correctly.

And tying your thoughts together with the "f" word or other
profanities is not "effective expression". That's just profanity, and
that undermines even the most poignant of posts.

have fun on t newsgroup Mr "Hate Radio"

Who's "Mr Hate Radio"...?!?!

If you mean me, Todd, that's inaccurate on several levels...First
and foremeost because I love radios...Amateur...CB...LMR...Military,
etc. I've been an Amateur since 1972, spent a career in government
service doing aircraft electronics, and am still involved in
radiocommunication, both as a professional and Amateur, to this day.

If you mean that I "hate" on the radio, that's wrong too.

I don't even hate you. I understand you better than you think.

It may be a bit cruel of me to take advantge of someone so
obviously ill-equipped to engage in such toe-to-toe exchanges in this
forum, but you keep coming back for more and making a fool out of
yourself, so I just assumed you like being publically humiliated. You
do keep giving us so much to work with, after all!

Enjoy!

Steve, K4YZ

Unlike SOME people who sign documents as the "CEO" of non-existant
companies and organizations, using ficticious last names, etc...

Not true, we are a non-profit organization who's purpose is to promote
Theater, Telecommunications, and the Performing Arts, and what
ficticious name??? I think your smoking crack.

Unlike SOME people who sign documents as the "CEO" of non-existant
companies and organizations, using ficticious last names, etc...

Not true, we are a non-profit organization who's purpose is to promote
Theater, Telecommunications, and the Performing Arts, and what
ficticious name??? I think your smoking crack.

Unlike SOME people who sign documents as the "CEO" of non-existant
companies and organizations, using ficticious last names, etc...

Not true, we are a non-profit organization who's purpose is to promote
Theater, Telecommunications, and the Performing Arts, and what
ficticious name??? I think your smoking crack.

N9OGL wrote:

Sorry...coorection

NO, I JUST DONT LIKE ASSHOLES WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THE MENTALLY ILL

FCC actions against Todd: Thousands of dollars

Reading a "coorection" from Todd: Priceless

Dave K8MN