Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote: NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing...so #### YOU!!!!! No, they are NOT the same thing. Your legal name is either O'Dochartaigh or it's Daugherty. This guy is a piece of work. Dave Clouston (Clouston and Heil are the same thing, or at least are close enough) K8MN |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Phil Kane wrote: On 24 Mar 2005 13:52:20 -0800, K4YZ wrote: Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL ESPECIALLY one with an identity crisis. No doubt that's the Gaelic spelling of his family name. If that is the case, maybe we should suggest that he go to Belfast and set up his pirate radio there. Let's see what Her Majesty's Forces would do in that case...... ggg Considering the fact that we are technically in a state of war, I'd think twice about intentionally violating federal laws...And I'd be doubly careful about badmouthing federal officials. Steve, K4YZ |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing...so #### YOU!!!!! No, they are NOT the same thing. Your legal name is either O'Dochartaigh or it's Daugherty. This guy is a piece of work. Dave Clouston (Clouston and Heil are the same thing, or at least are close enough) K8MN I'll adopt the name of a cartoon character my dad drew..."Alexander P Fuddlemeyer III" 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote:
No, I want the FCC to do is their JOB, the FCC is authorized to grant licenses, Look stupid, just because the FCC is authorized to grant licenses, does not mean they have to automatically grant you one. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote: Even if your reply had included attributions, Todd, it would still be difficult to read. Under the Communication Act of 1934 the FCC has juridiction over interstate and foreign commerce via wire or radio, Intrastate communications is the juridiction of the state. That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio. Toddyboy thinks radio waves stop at state borders. + |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote:
WELL YOU ****ING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU ****ING ASSHOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? They did consider your application and waiver toddyboy and came to the conclusion that you weren't capable of operating a station in the public interest, and by you post above, it is obvious to the most casual of observers that your aren't capable of operating a station. Just because you make an application for a license does not mean the FCC is required to issue you a license. Grow up toddyboy!! |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote:
The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie! You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee. Period. Prove it you freaking moron. Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing... No it isn't toddyboy, the way it is spelled on your birth certificate is your legal name, unless you have had it legally changed, the other spelling is not. Now if you have the incorrect spelling on your FCC Amateur Radio License, which is a legal document, then your Amateur Radio License isn't valid and you are operating illegally when you transmit using that license. so **** YOU!!!!! Grow up toddyboy!!!!! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: (Attributions inserted for sanity) That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. § 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created As well as 152 of the communication act § 152. Application of chapter or how about 153 of the communication act § 153. Definitions do I need to go on....... You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've read and misinterpreted them. Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me... Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you. it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. WELL YOU F--KING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU F--KING ASSHOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? Considering your request for a waiver and acting favorably upon your request are two very different things. With your history, it doesn't seem very likely that the Commission will ever issue you a broadcast license. So, the answer to your question about why you should continue to spend the time and money applying is: You probably shouldn't. You should come to terms with the fact that you aren't ever likely to have a broadcast license. Operating without a license can only lead you to grief. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING SLUT The word is "fictitious", Todd, not "FICTICIOUS" and yes, if that isn't your legal name, it is a fiction. By the way, I experienced an N9OGL time travel episode this afternoon. I opened a book and there was a message from my father written in the fly leaf. It was from 45 years in the past. Dave K8MN |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: (Attributions inserted for sanity) That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. § 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created As well as 152 of the communication act § 152. Application of chapter or how about 153 of the communication act § 153. Definitions do I need to go on....... You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've read and misinterpreted them. Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me... Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you. it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. WELL YOU F--KING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU F--KING ASSHOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? Considering your request for a waiver and acting favorably upon your request are two very different things. With your history, it doesn't seem very likely that the Commission will ever issue you a broadcast license. So, the answer to your question about why you should continue to spend the time and money applying is: You probably shouldn't. You should come to terms with the fact that you aren't ever likely to have a broadcast license. Operating without a license can only lead you to grief. No Dave, The point is the FCC never consider my waiver, and I went on the air LONG AFTER I had applied for a license. That's why I went on the air, because they weren't doing their job. Then those assholes (THE FCC) would go to court against a pirate radio operator abd claim all a ****ing pirate radio operator has to do is apply for a license and as for a waiver....they and your little bitches on here are a bunch of ****ing liars....and you little bitches on here can tell the FCC I said that. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING SLUT The word is "fictitious", Todd, not "FICTICIOUS" and yes, if that isn't your legal name, it is a fiction. As Pil stated that is the gaelic spelling of my name and I'm not going to give my heritage, to you our any of your little sluts here on this newsgroup or your butt buddies at the FCC. By the way, I experienced an N9OGL time travel episode this afternoon. I opened a book and there was a message from my father written in the fly leaf. It was from 45 years in the past. Dave K8MN nice coming from a licensed CB RADIO Operator Todd N9OGL ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Todd Daugherty wrote: In article , Dave Heil wrote: Considering your request for a waiver and acting favorably upon your request are two very different things. With your history, it doesn't seem very likely that the Commission will ever issue you a broadcast license. So, the answer to your question about why you should continue to spend the time and money applying is: You probably shouldn't. You should come to terms with the fact that you aren't ever likely to have a broadcast license. Operating without a license can only lead you to grief. No Dave, The point is the FCC never consider my waiver, and I went on the air LONG AFTER I had applied for a license. And here again you ADMIT to breaking the law. That's why I went on the air, because they weren't doing their job. They were keeping a mindless idiot off the air...Seems to me they were doing EXACTLY thier job! Then those ###holes (THE FCC) (SNIP...) That's right, Todd...Butter 'em up for your next evolution! would go to court against a pirate radio operator abd claim all a ####ing pirate radio operator has to do is apply for a license and as for a waiver....they and your little ******** on here are a bunch of ####ing liars....and you little ######## on here can tell the FCC I said that. And I am sure they will review any future correspondence with great scruitiny, Todd! Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ####ing **** The word is "fictitious", Todd, not "FICTICIOUS" and yes, if that isn't your legal name, it is a fiction. As Pil stated that is the gaelic spelling of my name and I'm not going to give my heritage, to you our any of your little ##### here on this newsgroup or your butt buddies at the FCC. You've already given us your "heritage", Todd. By the way, I experienced an N9OGL time travel episode this afternoon. I opened a book and there was a message from my father written in the fly leaf. It was from 45 years in the past. Dave K8MN nice coming from a licensed CB RADIO Operator Well...Guess that's a bit more civil than your other slurs. At least you spelled "CB" withought the "f" word in it... Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |