Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Todd Daugherty wrote:
In article , Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. WELL YOU F--KING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU F--KING ASSHOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? Considering your request for a waiver and acting favorably upon your request are two very different things. With your history, it doesn't seem very likely that the Commission will ever issue you a broadcast license. So, the answer to your question about why you should continue to spend the time and money applying is: You probably shouldn't. You should come to terms with the fact that you aren't ever likely to have a broadcast license. Operating without a license can only lead you to grief. No Dave, The point is the FCC never consider my waiver, and I went on the air LONG AFTER I had applied for a license. The FCC may or may not have considered your request for a waiver. If you went on the air without a license, you're simply a scofflaw and your lack of character will, no doubt, preclude you from ever having a broadcast license. Accept it. That's why I went on the air, because they weren't doing their job. There is no evidence that the Federal Communications Commission is not doing its job. There is plenty of evidence that you have no regard for the law. Then those assholes (THE FCC) would go to court against a pirate radio operator abd claim all a f--king pirate radio operator has to do is apply for a license and as for a waiver....they and your little bitches on here are a bunch of f--king liars....and you little bitches on here can tell the FCC I said that. Remember you wrote that. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING SLUT The word is "fictitious", Todd, not "FICTICIOUS" and yes, if that isn't your legal name, it is a fiction. As Pil stated that is the gaelic spelling of my name and I'm not going to give my heritage, to you our any of your little sluts here on this newsgroup or your butt buddies at the FCC. What's up, Doch? By the way, I experienced an N9OGL time travel episode this afternoon. I opened a book and there was a message from my father written in the fly leaf. It was from 45 years in the past. nice coming from a licensed CB RADIO Operator You've got the wrong newsgroup. I've never been a Citizens Band op in my life. I have an amateur radio callsign. I don't engage in playing pirate broadcaster. I don't rail at the FCC. I don't shift to all caps. I don't feel the need to use profanity to deal with you. You have some issues, Todd. You live in a fantasy world. You seemingly have a mental age of about 14 or 15. You don't understand government authority. "But I wanna" is not justification for a broadcast license. I'm frankly surprised that you've not yet lost your amateur radio license. Dave K8MN |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Avast ye scurvy dogs! Raise the Jolly Roger and man the guns! Thar be
piratin' ta do! Arr! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Todd Daugherty wrote:
nice coming from a licensed CB RADIO Operator There you go getting things wrong again toddyboy, CB doesn't require a license, in fact you can't get a license for CB, so Dave couldn't possibably be a "licensed" CB radio operator. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote: Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's some material gleaned from the archives: Ya know...the more I have this guy investigated, the more muddled he and his allegations and rants become. Here we have him whining about the FCC "not considering (his) waiver" in 2003... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003 ummmm....NO! I'm going to ##### and whine till I blue in the face. I'm not going to let this #### go...Those scumbag at the FCC and the court of appeals isn't going to hear the last of me for a long time. I was never found guilty of a freaking crime and I ####ing barred from getting a license. that's the true justice of ####ing america. Although you not guilty....your guilty......and your guilty unless you prove yourselves otherwise. well I have my application (all six) and a little **** ant note from some sandmonkey in the FCC say they couldn't consider my application or my ####ing waiver...I applied long before I went pirate and their are other "pirates" out there that I know that also applied long before going pirate. So I'm going to continue to bitch and whine til somethings done about this injustice. Todd Daugherty N9OGL Langely Park Telecommunication But according to the "website" of Todd's "Langley Park Telecommunications group, they WERE allocated a frequency and build permit in 2001!!! QUOTE: 107.9 FM COMMUNITY RADIO PROVIDING PROGRAMMING AND FREE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE AIRWAVES LATEST NEWS Langley Park Telecommunications is one of the 255 applicants approved by the F.C.C. UNQUOTE: I even went to the FCC and found this: QUOTE: BNPL-20000828ACC NEW TAYLORVILLE, IL LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNUICATIONS REQ: 107.9 MHz Channel No. 300 UNQUOTE: So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I don't beleive there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation! Of course Todd's earlier expressions of disdain for FCC regulations might have had something to do with their decision to reconsider granting him a license: QUOTE: from alt.radio pirate, May 1999 Well mark I tell you what, I applied twice for a licnese and both time it was returned so your right SCREW THEM!!! I'm going on the air without a License. Todd N9OGL UNQUOTE Of course it may have something to do with his frequent changing of his name. The Feds don't look favorably on name changes that aren't due to marriage or entrance to the Witness Protection Program. Witness: from alt.tv.public-access, Jan. 2001 Hi once again.... langley park has updated their home page a little and will continue to update it often. Todd Daugherty CEO/PRESIDENT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html And hs earlier nomme-de-guer from alt.radio.pirate, May 2000, Todd's "origization" looks for a type "excepted" transmitter. The name change must reflect some on-air personna. hello, My origization is wanting to apply for the LP100 license here in Illinois when the filing window opens in August. We are looking for a ten to twenty watt FCC type execpted transmitter. we mainly want to know what the cost is on the transmitter. Todd O'Dochartaigh President Langley Park Telecommunication Is anyone keeping up with this? from alt.radio.pirate, Feb. 2000 ...reality is Public Access has it problems with local authorities trying to censor programming and those access channel they couldn't censor the local authorities has shut down. So sure you have a little radio station but watch what you say over them because if it's something the local authorities don't want broadcast like police's violation of Human rights then they will try every thing to get rid of you. "Oh but Todd were protected by the FCC rules" well some local authorities give a rats ass about the FCC or their rules. They will even go so far to try to ban "radio signals except those all ready established" believe me there are some local governments will try that. The local government tried back in the 80's to ban all amateur radio signals to the city limits. then there is of course antenna laws and sure the FCC can tell you that the towers are exempted but the local governements have found loopholes in the system. I've in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these Low Power Radio Stations. Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV CHANNEL 14 Taylorville's Pirate Television station ~Born a Pirate, Die a Pirate~ He's been "...in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these low power stations," Well, obviously not true since he can't seem to file the appropriate documentation with the FCC in a timely manner. And again, represents himself with the false last name for a television station that doesn't exist. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- from alt.radio.pirate, Aug. 1999--Todd's disability and folks infringing on his right to be a radio/TV pirate First of you moron, it is my opinion and I have the right to express it. It federal Suckup like you who infringe on peoples constitutional right not only when it comes to busting Pirates but infringe on peoples right who wish to voice their point of view on the internet. It is people like you that have no life instead spend most of their time on the net bad mouthing how people write or their opinion. I really feel sorry for someone like you. It is in fact people like you who are turning this from a constitutional system to a dictatorship. As for my write I do have a disability and in that your lucky I don't get you on discrimination. The FCC is also lucky if they think like you that I don't them on it to. That All i have to say to you. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL WLPS TV CHANNNEL 14 Taylorville Illinois #1 Pirate TV station Just muddling throught the grammar on that one was an effort. But basically my comment to Todd is that if you'd stop waving an "I'm Intentionally Breaking the Law" flag, people, myself included, wouldn't give you a hard time. But you do (arguing that it's your "free speech" to do so) so just suck it up and suffer the consequences, Todd. You're a law breaker. You've acknowledged it yourself. It really is THAT simple. Steve, K4YZ |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's some material gleaned from the archives: Ya know...the more I have this guy investigated, the more muddled he and his allegations and rants become. Here we have him whining about the FCC "not considering (his) waiver" in 2003... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003 ummmm....NO! I'm going to ##### and whine till I blue in the face. I'm not going to let this #### go...Those scumbag at the FCC and the court of appeals isn't going to hear the last of me for a long time. I was never found guilty of a freaking crime and I ####ing barred from getting a license. that's the true justice of ####ing america. Although you not guilty....your guilty......and your guilty unless you prove yourselves otherwise. well I have my application (all six) and a little **** ant note from some sandmonkey in the FCC say they couldn't consider my application or my ####ing waiver...I applied long before I went pirate and their are other "pirates" out there that I know that also applied long before going pirate. So I'm going to continue to bitch and whine til somethings done about this injustice. Todd Daugherty N9OGL Langely Park Telecommunication But according to the "website" of Todd's "Langley Park Telecommunications group, they WERE allocated a frequency and build permit in 2001!!! QUOTE: 107.9 FM COMMUNITY RADIO PROVIDING PROGRAMMING AND FREE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE AIRWAVES LATEST NEWS Langley Park Telecommunications is one of the 255 applicants approved by the F.C.C. UNQUOTE: I even went to the FCC and found this: QUOTE: BNPL-20000828ACC NEW TAYLORVILLE, IL LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNUICATIONS REQ: 107.9 MHz Channel No. 300 UNQUOTE: So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I don't beleive there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation! Of course Todd's earlier expressions of disdain for FCC regulations might have had something to do with their decision to reconsider granting him a license: QUOTE: from alt.radio pirate, May 1999 Well mark I tell you what, I applied twice for a licnese and both time it was returned so your right SCREW THEM!!! I'm going on the air without a License. Todd N9OGL UNQUOTE Of course it may have something to do with his frequent changing of his name. The Feds don't look favorably on name changes that aren't due to marriage or entrance to the Witness Protection Program. Witness: from alt.tv.public-access, Jan. 2001 Hi once again.... langley park has updated their home page a little and will continue to update it often. Todd Daugherty CEO/PRESIDENT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html And hs earlier nomme-de-guer from alt.radio.pirate, May 2000, Todd's "origization" looks for a type "excepted" transmitter. The name change must reflect some on-air personna. hello, My origization is wanting to apply for the LP100 license here in Illinois when the filing window opens in August. We are looking for a ten to twenty watt FCC type execpted transmitter. we mainly want to know what the cost is on the transmitter. Todd O'Dochartaigh President Langley Park Telecommunication Is anyone keeping up with this? from alt.radio.pirate, Feb. 2000 ...reality is Public Access has it problems with local authorities trying to censor programming and those access channel they couldn't censor the local authorities has shut down. So sure you have a little radio station but watch what you say over them because if it's something the local authorities don't want broadcast like police's violation of Human rights then they will try every thing to get rid of you. "Oh but Todd were protected by the FCC rules" well some local authorities give a rats ass about the FCC or their rules. They will even go so far to try to ban "radio signals except those all ready established" believe me there are some local governments will try that. The local government tried back in the 80's to ban all amateur radio signals to the city limits. then there is of course antenna laws and sure the FCC can tell you that the towers are exempted but the local governements have found loopholes in the system. I've in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these Low Power Radio Stations. Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV CHANNEL 14 Taylorville's Pirate Television station ~Born a Pirate, Die a Pirate~ He's been "...in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these low power stations," Well, obviously not true since he can't seem to file the appropriate documentation with the FCC in a timely manner. And again, represents himself with the false last name for a television station that doesn't exist. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- from alt.radio.pirate, Aug. 1999--Todd's disability and folks infringing on his right to be a radio/TV pirate First of you moron, it is my opinion and I have the right to express it. It federal Suckup like you who infringe on peoples constitutional right not only when it comes to busting Pirates but infringe on peoples right who wish to voice their point of view on the internet. It is people like you that have no life instead spend most of their time on the net bad mouthing how people write or their opinion. I really feel sorry for someone like you. It is in fact people like you who are turning this from a constitutional system to a dictatorship. As for my write I do have a disability and in that your lucky I don't get you on discrimination. The FCC is also lucky if they think like you that I don't them on it to. That All i have to say to you. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL WLPS TV CHANNNEL 14 Taylorville Illinois #1 Pirate TV station Just muddling throught the grammar on that one was an effort. But basically my comment to Todd is that if you'd stop waving an "I'm Intentionally Breaking the Law" flag, people, myself included, wouldn't give you a hard time. But you do (arguing that it's your "free speech" to do so) so just suck it up and suffer the consequences, Todd. You're a law breaker. You've acknowledged it yourself. It really is THAT simple. Steve, K4YZ There's a lot more there then what's been said........SO go ahead and whine to the FCC todd N9OGL |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's some material gleaned from the archives: Ya know...the more I have this guy investigated, the more muddled he and his allegations and rants become. Here we have him whining about the FCC "not considering (his) waiver" in 2003... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003 ummmm....NO! I'm going to ##### and whine till I blue in the face. I'm not going to let this #### go...Those scumbag at the FCC and the court of appeals isn't going to hear the last of me for a long time. I was never found guilty of a freaking crime and I ####ing barred from getting a license. that's the true justice of ####ing america. Although you not guilty....your guilty......and your guilty unless you prove yourselves otherwise. well I have my application (all six) and a little **** ant note from some sandmonkey in the FCC say they couldn't consider my application or my ####ing waiver...I applied long before I went pirate and their are other "pirates" out there that I know that also applied long before going pirate. So I'm going to continue to bitch and whine til somethings done about this injustice. Todd Daugherty N9OGL Langely Park Telecommunication But according to the "website" of Todd's "Langley Park Telecommunications group, they WERE allocated a frequency and build permit in 2001!!! QUOTE: 107.9 FM COMMUNITY RADIO PROVIDING PROGRAMMING AND FREE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE AIRWAVES LATEST NEWS Langley Park Telecommunications is one of the 255 applicants approved by the F.C.C. UNQUOTE: I even went to the FCC and found this: QUOTE: BNPL-20000828ACC NEW TAYLORVILLE, IL LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNUICATIONS REQ: 107.9 MHz Channel No. 300 UNQUOTE: So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I don't beleive there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation! Not true ASSHOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur radio operators. Second the Application was dismissed after congress passed the Radio Broadcast Perservation Act of 2001. Before you go spewing for LIES I would really suggest you get all the facts. You don't know all the facts, you weren't there....so my opinion is **** off! Of course Todd's earlier expressions of disdain for FCC regulations might have had something to do with their decision to reconsider granting him a license: They NEVER DID ASSHOLE......BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR BIG MOUTH WHY DO YOU GET ALL THE FACTS. To tell you the truth I don't think the FCC wants to open that can of worms. QUOTE: from alt.radio pirate, May 1999 Well mark I tell you what, I applied twice for a licnese and both time it was returned so your right SCREW THEM!!! I'm going on the air without a License. Todd N9OGL UNQUOTE Of course it may have something to do with his frequent changing of his name. The Feds don't look favorably on name changes that aren't due to marriage or entrance to the Witness Protection Program. Hey asshole, Different names are legal on the ****ING internet. Witness: from alt.tv.public-access, Jan. 2001 Hi once again.... langley park has updated their home page a little and will continue to update it often. Todd Daugherty CEO/PRESIDENT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html And hs earlier nomme-de-guer from alt.radio.pirate, May 2000, Todd's "origization" looks for a type "excepted" transmitter. The name change must reflect some on-air personna. hello, My origization is wanting to apply for the LP100 license here in Illinois when the filing window opens in August. We are looking for a ten to twenty watt FCC type execpted transmitter. we mainly want to know what the cost is on the transmitter. Todd O'Dochartaigh President Langley Park Telecommunication Is anyone keeping up with this? from alt.radio.pirate, Feb. 2000 ...reality is Public Access has it problems with local authorities trying to censor programming and those access channel they couldn't censor the local authorities has shut down. So sure you have a little radio station but watch what you say over them because if it's something the local authorities don't want broadcast like police's violation of Human rights then they will try every thing to get rid of you. "Oh but Todd were protected by the FCC rules" well some local authorities give a rats ass about the FCC or their rules. They will even go so far to try to ban "radio signals except those all ready established" believe me there are some local governments will try that. The local government tried back in the 80's to ban all amateur radio signals to the city limits. then there is of course antenna laws and sure the FCC can tell you that the towers are exempted but the local governements have found loopholes in the system. I've in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these Low Power Radio Stations. Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV CHANNEL 14 Taylorville's Pirate Television station ~Born a Pirate, Die a Pirate~ He's been "...in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these low power stations," Well, obviously not true since he can't seem to file the appropriate documentation with the FCC in a timely manner. WAIVER CAN BE FILED AT ANYTIME ASSHOLE.....NOT JUST IN FILING WINDOWS. And again, represents himself with the false last name for a television station that doesn't exist. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- from alt.radio.pirate, Aug. 1999--Todd's disability and folks infringing on his right to be a radio/TV pirate First of you moron, it is my opinion and I have the right to express it. It federal Suckup like you who infringe on peoples constitutional right not only when it comes to busting Pirates but infringe on peoples right who wish to voice their point of view on the internet. It is people like you that have no life instead spend most of their time on the net bad mouthing how people write or their opinion. I really feel sorry for someone like you. It is in fact people like you who are turning this from a constitutional system to a dictatorship. As for my write I do have a disability and in that your lucky I don't get you on discrimination. The FCC is also lucky if they think like you that I don't them on it to. That All i have to say to you. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL WLPS TV CHANNNEL 14 Taylorville Illinois #1 Pirate TV station Just muddling throught the grammar on that one was an effort. But basically my comment to Todd is that if you'd stop waving an "I'm Intentionally Breaking the Law" flag, people, myself included, wouldn't give you a hard time. But you do (arguing that it's your "free speech" to do so) so just suck it up and suffer the consequences, Todd. You're a law breaker. You've acknowledged it yourself. It really is THAT simple. AND LIKE I SAID YOU ****ING BITCH THERE MORE THERE THEN WHAT YOUR LITTLE CB RADIO ASS KNOWS. Steve, K4YZ TODD O'DOCHARTAIGH!!!!! |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I don't beleive there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation! Not true ###HOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur radio operators. Second the Application was dismissed after congress passed the Radio Broadcast Perservation Act of 2001. Before you go spewing for LIES I would really suggest you get all the facts. You don't know all the facts, you weren't there....so my opinion is #### off! Ooooooooh! Those were the comments of a tru patron of the arts! He's been "...in the public Access business longer then the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these low power stations," Well, obviously not true since he can't seem to file the appropriate documentation with the FCC in a timely manner. WAIVER CAN BE FILED AT ANYTIME ###HOLE.....NOT JUST IN FILING WINDOWS. And obviously you didn't meet commission criteria for that waiver or you would have gotten your callsign. You're a law breaker. You've acknowledged it yourself. It really is THAT simple. AND LIKE I SAID YOU ####ING ##### THERE MORE THERE THEN WHAT YOUR LITTLE CB RADIO ### KNOWS. You're a lawbreaker, Todd. You have openly admitted that you wantonly violated federal law and don't care that anyone knows. OK..we know! TODD O'DOCHARTAIGH!!!!! Confused little man with a severe ego problem. Steve, K4YZ |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
DICKHEAD, they never looked at my application or waiver, and if the FCC
denies a waiver they have to show good cause why. Like I said go ahead and bitch to the FCC or who ever(which I really doubt you will) what your doing is opening a bad can of worms.....I would like to point out the FCC has know for YEARS that I was pirating......they won't tounch me because they will have to explain to the court of Appeals why for 20 to 30 years they have lied to the courts about waivers....and by GOD I will bring it up! SO GO RIGHT AHEAD GET YOUR NUTS OFF!!! Todd O'Dochataigh N9OGL |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: ####HEAD, they never looked at my application or waiver, and if the FCC denies a waiver they have to show good cause why. They already HAVE "ggod cause". You're profane, openly violate federal law, are functionally illiterate, and your papaerwork is not filed correctly. I have a nickle says you filed them in crayon or "MajikMarker" Like I said go ahead and bitch to the FCC or who ever(which I really doubt you will) what your doing is opening a bad can of worms.....I would like to point out the FCC has know for YEARS that I was pirating...... Then Todd, there's your answer. Don't blame one more thing on the FCC or any other agency or entity. Todd Daugherty is solely responsible for the failure of Todd Daugherty to get his LPFM license. Period. they won't tounch me because they will have to explain to the court of Appeals why for 20 to 30 years they have lied to the courts about waivers.... What "20 to 30 years", Todd...??? You're not even 40, so you have NOT been filing applications for "20 to 30 years". and by GOD I will bring it up! SO GO RIGHT AHEAD GET YOUR NUTS OFF!!! And just a one of your posts in this forum acknowledging your lawlessness will toss any and all arguments out the door. Todd O'Dochataigh N9OGL Sheeesh, Todd...You can't even spell your BOGUS sur-name right! BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA HA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! What an idiot! Steve, K4YZ |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
They already HAVE "ggod cause". You're profane, openly violate
federal law, are functionally illiterate, and your papaerwork is not filed correctly. I have a nickle says you filed them in crayon or "MajikMarker FIRST OFF DICKHEAD!!!! I applied for a license long before I went on the air without a license. Like I said before Steve you ****ing asshole you don't know what happen and your best bet is shut your ****ing pie hole. Then Todd, there's your answer. Don't blame one more thing on the FCC or any other agency or entity. Todd Daugherty is solely responsible for the failure of Todd Daugherty to get his LPFM license. Period. Hey Dickhead, let me give some ****ing background, because you don't know what the **** your talking about and you can passs this on to your little sluts at the FCC. Back in the late 90's (around 1997-1998) I applied six times for a Low Power Television License for "a community that doesn't have a local television service" (Waiver at 2) each time I applied for for a license with a waiver the FCC would send them back without considering them. (see Part 1.3 of Communication Act of 1934) "The provisions of this chapter may be suspended, revoked, amended, or waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and the provisions of this chapter. Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown." (47CFR1.3) The Court of Appeal has even gone farther stating the FCC "MUST consider waivers" (Wait Radio v. FCC (1969) See Turro v. FCC(1986) See Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC (1968) See United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.(1956) See Dunifer v.FCC (1998) After applying six times for a license with a waiver I figured it was a waste of time and MONEY (unlike ham's who are handed a license)So I went on the air without a license. I stopped after a short period and applied for a low power radio license which we were one of 255 who applied. That was short lived after teh National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) pushed congress to pass the Radio Broadcast Preservation Act of 2001 and we lost are license because of it. If this was ever to go to court I will argue that the FCC has lied all these years about the waiver process. The FCC would go to court against a pirate radio station and argue that all they had to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But, when a person who never pirated does apply for a license with a waiver they dismiss it without consider it. The second thing I would ask the court by not consider my waiver was it in the public interest. Because before we applied for a low power television license we went around the community and asked the people in the community if they would want a "Local TV" station and all agree they did, So Where the public interest at???? Perhaps your little Butt Buddies at the FCC can explain that to the courts. BTW O'Dochartaigh is my surname you ****ing Nazi Scumbag |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |