Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote:
Toddyboy's usual jr highschool vulgarities deleted Grow up toddyboy!! |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Reamping of last post:
FIRST OFF DICKHEAD!!!! I applied for a license long before I went on the air without a license. Like I said before Steve you ****ing asshole you don't know what happen and your best bet is shut your ****ing pie hole. Hey Dickhead, let me give some ****ing background, because you don't know what the **** your talking about and you can passs this on to your little sluts at the FCC. Back in the late 90's (around 1997-1998) I applied six times for a Low Power Television License for "a community that doesn't have a local television service" (Waiver at 2) each time I applied for for a license with a waiver the FCC would send them back without considering them. (see Part 1.3 of Communication Act of 1934) "The provisions of this chapter may be suspended, revoked, amended, or waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and the provisions of this chapter. Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown." (47CFR1.3) The Court of Appeal has even gone farther stating the FCC "MUST consider waivers" (Wait Radio v. FCC (1969) See Turro v. FCC(1986) See Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC (1968) See United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.(1956) See Dunifer v.FCC (1998) After applying six times for a license with a waiver I figured it was a waste of time and MONEY (unlike ham's who are handed a license)So I went on the air without a license. I stopped after a short period and applied for a low power radio license which we were one of 255 who applied. That was short lived after the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) pushed congress to pass the Radio Broadcast Preservation Act of 2001 and we lost are license because of it. If this was ever to go to court I will argue that the FCC has lied all these years about the waiver process. The FCC would go to court against a pirate radio station and argue that all they had to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But, when a person who never pirated does apply for a license with a waiver they dismiss it without consider it. The second thing I would ask the court by not consider my waiver wasn't it in the public interest. Because before we applied for a low power television license we went around the community and asked the people in the community if they would want a "Local TV" station and all agree they did, So Where the public interest at???? Perhaps your little Butt Buddies at the FCC can explain that to the courts. BTW O'Dochartaigh is my surname you ****ing Nazi Scumbag |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
It wan't all vulgar.....moron
Why do you grow up, because all I see is your stupid one line post |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: Reamping of last post: Too bad you didn't take the time to do it right the first time, eh? FIRST OFF ####HEAD!!!! I am not your mother, Todd. I applied for a license long before I went on the air without a license. Like I said before Steve you ####ing ###hole you don't know what happen and your best bet is shut your ####ing pie hole. The last thing you want to do is even remotely appear to be threatening me, Todd. Hey ####head... I told you I am not your mother. .....let me give some ####ing background, because you don't know what the #### your talking about and you can passs this on to your little ##### at the FCC. There's nothing you can tell me tat will, in the very least impress or "enlighten" me, Todd. Back in the late 90's (around 1997-1998) I applied six times for a Low Power Television License for "a community that doesn't have a local television service" (Waiver at 2) each time I applied for for a license with a waiver the FCC would send them back without considering them. (see Part 1.3 of Communication Act of 1934) "The provisions of this chapter may be suspended, revoked, amended, or waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and the provisions of this chapter. Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown." (47CFR1.3) ".....IF GOOD CAUSE IS SHOWN." My emphasis, since you only see what you WANT to see, Todd. The Court of Appeal has even gone farther stating the FCC "MUST consider waivers" (Wait Radio v. FCC (1969) See Turro v. FCC(1986) See Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC (1968) See United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.(1956) See Dunifer v.FCC (1998) You can quote the National Anthem, Todd, and it won't change the fact that YOU DO NOT QUALIFY TO BE AN FCC LICENSEE"...! ! ! ! After applying six times for a license with a waiver I figured it was a waste of time and MONEY (unlike ham's who are handed a license)So I went on the air without a license. Todd, the FCC doesn't care why you go on the air without a license. If you operate a radio transmitter without an appropriate station license for any purpose other than summoning assistance in a life threatening emergency, you're BREAKING THE LAW. It really is THAT simple. There is NO EXCUSE (other than the aforementioned LIFE THREATENING emergency) for you to break ANY of those laws pertaining to the operating of a rdio station in the United States. Period. I stopped after a short period and applied for a low power radio license which we were one of 255 who applied. That was short lived after the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) pushed congress to pass the Radio Broadcast Preservation Act of 2001 and we lost are license because of it. Oh boo hoo. You didn't qualify to be a licensee any way. If this was ever to go to court I will argue that the FCC has lied all these years about the waiver process. Todd, it's been four years now. You're not in court. The only reason YOU will be in court due to any FCC-related issue will be YOUR wanton violation of the Communications Act. The FCC would go to court against a pirate radio station and argue that all they had to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But, when a person who never pirated does apply for a license with a waiver they dismiss it without consider it. The second thing I would ask the court by not consider my waiver wasn't it in the public interest. Letting a foul mouthed, illiterate punk like you have a broadcast station license is in the Public interest..?!?! (Enter extremely long BWHAHAHAH here...I'll save bandwidth...) Because before we applied for a low power television license we went around the community and asked the people in the community if they would want a "Local TV" station and all agree they did, So Where the public interest at???? Then perhaps the community can retain a competent communications lawyer to file an appropriate petition with the FCC to overcome their unwillingness to let YOU have a station license. And I say "competent communications lawyer" because letting YOU handle "communications issues" is like letting Don Rickles handle "sensitivity training" seminars. Perhaps your little Butt Buddies at the FCC can explain that to the courts. What's to explain? You're not qualified to be a licensee. It really is that simple. BTW O'Dochartaigh is my surname you ####ing Nazi scumbag. No, it's not, Todd. It may have been an old family name, but it's not now. At least not on legal documents that you have filed with the FCC. And my point, you illiterate idiot, is that in the OTHER post you SPELLED IT WRONG! BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Steve, K4YZ |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: It wan't all vulgar.....moron "It wan't"...?!?! I say it was! It was stupid, right from the very first line where you wrote "reamping of first post" where it SHOULD have said "revamping". Why do you grow up, because all I see is your stupid one line post That's because he was able to effectively express himself in just one line. YOU, on the otherhand, usually manage to start screwing up right from the first line...Just like the post I am responding to.... BBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! What a putz! Steve, K4YZ |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I don't beleive there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation! Not true ###HOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur radio operators. "C O M P A N Y", Todd. Just like I spelled it the first time. And since you claim this group is made of of licensed Amateurs, how about a roll call? Who are these other Amateurs? Names? Callsigns? By the way, Todd, if your "Langley Park Telecommunications" group is a LEGAL "company" chartered in the state of Illinois, you are obligated, when asked, to identify the principal officers of the company. Whellllp....You've been asked. Personally...I bet it's just one more example of your illiterate imagination. Steve, K4YZ |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: It wan't all vulgar.....moron "It wan't"...?!?! I say it was! It was stupid, right from the very first line where you wrote "reamping of first post" where it SHOULD have said "revamping". Why do you grow up, because all I see is your stupid one line post That's because he was able to effectively express himself in just one line. YOU, on the otherhand, usually manage to start screwing up right from the first line...Just like the post I am responding to.... BBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! What a putz! Steve, K4YZ And your a ****ing asshole that nobody on here ****ing likes.....perhaps if your such an asshole in your post people would repect you a little better, but for now no body likes you steve, simply because your a ****ing asshole.....like I said GO FOR IT, I really doubt the FCC will do anything, as for my service provider all he wanted was the picture removed which I did, anything else he won't mess with....so your kind of ****ed there....so go cry to the FCC boooo hooooo JERK TODD O'DOCHARTAIGH N9OGL |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: It wan't all vulgar.....moron "It wan't"...?!?! I say it was! It was stupid, right from the very first line where you wrote "reamping of first post" where it SHOULD have said "revamping". Why do you grow up, because all I see is your stupid one line post That's because he was able to effectively express himself in just one line. YOU, on the otherhand, usually manage to start screwing up right from the first line...Just like the post I am responding to.... BBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! What a putz! Steve, K4YZ And your a ****ing ###hole that nobody on here ####ing likes.....perhaps if your such an $$$hole in your post people would repect you a little better, but for now no body likes you steve, simply because your a ###ing ###hole..... Such as WHO, Todd? "A Melon"..?!?! "Tapioca"...?!?! Brian Burke and Lennie don't like me because I don't take their lying and misrepresentations...Just like I don't take yours...Seems I get along just fine with everyone else. On the OTHERHAND, I don't see a SINGLE person who owns up to signing their posts with their REAL name that "supports" you, and several anonymous posters think you're an idiot too. like I said GO FOR IT, I really doubt the FCC will do anything...(SNIP) Who said anything about the FCC...?!?! as for my service provider all he wanted was the picture removed which I did, anything else he won't mess with....so your kind of ####ed there....so go cry to the FCC boooo hooooo Who said anything about the FCC...?!?! JERK TODD O'DOCHARTAIGH N9OGL Pathological liar. Steve, K4YZ |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote:
It wan't all vulgar.....moron Why do you grow up, because all I see is your stupid one line post Did you mean, "why *don't* you grow up"? Do you see me making post filled with vulgar jr highschool language? You really should think about attempting to act like an adult instead of a spoiled child. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: It wan't all vulgar.....moron "It wan't"...?!?! I say it was! It was stupid, right from the very first line where you wrote "reamping of first post" where it SHOULD have said "revamping". Why do you grow up, because all I see is your stupid one line post That's because he was able to effectively express himself in just one line. YOU, on the otherhand, usually manage to start screwing up right from the first line...Just like the post I am responding to.... BBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! What a putz! Steve, K4YZ And your a ****ing asshole that nobody on here ****ing likes.....perhaps if your such an asshole in your post people would repect you a little better, but for now no body likes you steve, simply because your a ****ing asshole.....like I said GO FOR IT, I really doubt the FCC will do anything, as for my service provider all he wanted was the picture removed which I did, anything else he won't mess with....so your kind of ****ed there....so go cry to the FCC boooo hooooo JERK TODD O'DOCHARTAIGH N9OGL Get back on your meds todd. Please seek help first thing Monday morning! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |