Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Dee Flint on Jul 4, 3:40 pm
"John Smith" wrote in message Dee: Frankly I am surprised you are so offended over his "derogatory remarks", you all seem so asleep to the real world that short of striking you over the head with a two-by-four you will remain in this dream-like state. Positive is not always good, except to "new agers" studying mysticism and crystals, and I have no time for silliness... If offended by reality one can always change reality or change themselves--I have always found the latter more productive. He (Len) battles a whole klick of you which are functioning like a damn support group--and you don't let little things like reality, "real world", sanity and facts get in your way. You all begin your chants of known mantras and chase the light-weights away! You all exist in an echo chamber using the echo of your own words as "valid arguments", or to site "majority agreements." To be effective in the real world, one does not insult people with derogatory remarks. ...except in computer-modem communications! :-) In my profession, I frequently have to convince people that the new is better than the old. Hello? What "profession" is that? :-) I've only been in the electronics profession for...um...53 years now. Life Member in the IEEE, an international professional association. Guess that doesn't count, does it? :-) Is this newsgroup participation a "profession?" Insults and put downs would get me thrown out the door and cost me a job. It doesn't get a whole lot more real than that. Oh, I think that 53 years of actual professional participation might agree with you...and also disagree with you. Have you ever been on both sides of a Design Review meeting? :-) It takes tact along with accurate and verifiable data to implement new proposals. ...which doesn't apply to REMOVING an ancient test element for a radio hobby license. :-) Where is the "tact" and "accurate and verifiable data" to support the subjective claims, necessities, nobilities, expertise of morsemanship for a radio hobby? Ain't there, is it? :-) The cutting edge people in the real world know this although it may come as a shock to those in academia. ...which means what? Morsemanship is "cutting edge" comms? :-) [put the cover back on your jar of academia nuts] Len does not use tact and does not present accurate and verifiable data. Tsk. I've used hundreds of tacts to nail your morsemanship to the carpet and you still think that carpet will fly! :-) I'd best re-do my PowerPoint files, then? I'd use Vu-Graphs but your projector's bulb is burned out... bit bit |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | CB |