|
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut You seem to have the idea of welfare backward, Len, and you've introduced a factual error. There was never a class of license under Incentive Licensing, which provided an upgrade for merely passing a morse exam. Factual error? It was called the Tech-Plus. And before you go calling me a liar, I'll correct myself and say, "Technician-Plus." The Tech-Plus came into existence long, long after the implementation of Incentive Licensing. so what? now you add more words why not admit the mistake instead of trying to cover it up, badly? Dave K8MN |
Dee Flint wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message k.net... wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: Jim Hampton on Aug 30, 6:12 pm wrote in message Didn't they find that out with welfare? You mean the WELFARE system that rewarded the high-rate morsemen with fancier titles and better privileges, such as in the "incentive plan" licensing system? Yes. It worked very well, didn't it? You seem to have the idea of welfare backward, Len, and you've introduced a factual error. There was never a class of license under Incentive Licensing, which provided an upgrade for merely passing a morse exam. Factual error? It was called the Tech-Plus. And before you go calling me a liar, I'll correct myself and say, "Technician-Plus." The Tech-Plus came into existence long, long after the implementation of Incentive Licensing. Dave K8MN And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message k.net... wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: Jim Hampton on Aug 30, 6:12 pm wrote in message Didn't they find that out with welfare? You mean the WELFARE system that rewarded the high-rate morsemen with fancier titles and better privileges, such as in the "incentive plan" licensing system? Yes. It worked very well, didn't it? You seem to have the idea of welfare backward, Len, and you've introduced a factual error. There was never a class of license under Incentive Licensing, which provided an upgrade for merely passing a morse exam. Factual error? It was called the Tech-Plus. And before you go calling me a liar, I'll correct myself and say, "Technician-Plus." The Tech-Plus came into existence long, long after the implementation of Incentive Licensing. Dave K8MN And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses And how is factual data considered an insult? At the introduction of the No Code Tech Fact: Novice was the lowest class requiring one written and one code test. Fact: Tech was a "higher" license class requiring the Novice written & Tech written but not the Novice code and did not grant Novice privileges. Fact: To get Novice privileges, Techs had to pass the Novice code. What is insulting about that? Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses And how is factual data considered an insult? by being presented in an insluting manner you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs |
Dee Flint wrote: "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut Dave K8MN And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses And how is factual data considered an insult? by showing the Speacker as an elistist That you even think in such terms is insulting At the introduction of the No Code Tech Fact: Novice was the lowest class requiring one written and one code test. Fact: Tech was a "higher" license class requiring the Novice written & Tech written but not the Novice code and did not grant Novice privileges. Fact: To get Novice privileges, Techs had to pass the Novice code. What is insulting about that? It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by the statement However I suspect you will be Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses And how is factual data considered an insult? by being presented in an insluting manner you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a degree of paranoia to so construe it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses And how is factual data considered an insult? by being presented in an insluting manner you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a degree of paranoia to so construe it. certianly were insulting phrases Lowest classes that you think in those terms shows you an elitest Like I said "It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by the statement " "However I suspect you will be " Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut Dave K8MN And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license class. boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there licenses And how is factual data considered an insult? by showing the Speacker as an elistist That you even think in such terms is insulting At the introduction of the No Code Tech Fact: Novice was the lowest class requiring one written and one code test. Fact: Tech was a "higher" license class requiring the Novice written & Tech written but not the Novice code and did not grant Novice privileges. Fact: To get Novice privileges, Techs had to pass the Novice code. What is insulting about that? It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by the statement However I suspect you will be Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Not in the least. Those suffering from paranoia have no power to insult me regardless of their choice of words and attempts to do so. In addition, elitest is a qualitative judgement which I do not have to accept as fact. Bitch is totally inaccurate as I am a human being not a canine so again I do not have to accept it as fact. On the other hand, as licenses are defined by the FCC, Novice is a lower class license that Tech. Tech is a lower class license than General and so on. I did not create the classes or the definitions. Since I have chosen to be a licensed amateur, I must abide by the FCC's definitions. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message cut And how is factual data considered an insult? by being presented in an insluting manner you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a degree of paranoia to so construe it. how do you expect to be an effective elmer if you can't reconize that you are being rude Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com