Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

cut
Dave K8MN


And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have
not
only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license
class.

boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there
licenses


And how is factual data considered an insult?

by showing the Speacker as an elistist

That you even think in such terms is insulting

At the introduction of the No Code Tech

Fact: Novice was the lowest class requiring one written and one code
test.
Fact: Tech was a "higher" license class requiring the Novice written &
Tech
written but not the Novice code and did not grant Novice privileges.
Fact: To get Novice privileges, Techs had to pass the Novice code.

What is insulting about that?

It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement

However I suspect you will be

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Not in the least. Those suffering from paranoia have no power to insult me
Indeed another MD amoug us

regardless of their choice of words and attempts to do so. In addition,
elitest is a qualitative judgement which I do not have to accept as fact.

wether you accept it or not it is clearly a fact

Bitch is totally inaccurate as I am a human being not a canine so again I do
not have to accept it as fact.

ah yes the ability to see only the difinition you want to see

but none of your ranting changes the fact you are an elitist bitch


On the other hand, as licenses are defined by the FCC, Novice is a lower
class license that Tech. Tech is a lower class license than General and so
on. I did not create the classes or the definitions. Since I have chosen
to be a licensed amateur, I must abide by the FCC's definitions.

but you choose to be insulting by pointing things out in those terms


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...
cut And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to
have not
only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest"
license
class.

boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there
licenses


And how is factual data considered an insult?

by being presented in an insluting manner

you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted

you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs


There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a
degree
of paranoia to so construe it.

certianly were insulting phrases

Lowest classes


It is not my fault that the language has been so perverted that use of the
word class is not PC. Class simply means category. There really aren't
good synonyms to use to describe the relative ranks of licenses other than
higher or lower. However I could use class instead of category but I
don't feel like bowing to the pressures of those who are trying to mangle
our language and force their vision of politically correct speach on the
rest of us. When will category become politically incorrect. It never
ends.


that you think in those terms shows you an elitest


To me, class is synonymous with category. Therefore there is no insult and
no elitism.

Like I said "It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist
Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement "

"However I suspect you will be "


As stated, you haven't the power to insult me.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...
cut And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to
have not
only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest"
license
class.

boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there
licenses


And how is factual data considered an insult?

by being presented in an insluting manner

you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted

you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs


There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a
degree
of paranoia to so construe it.

certianly were insulting phrases

Lowest classes


It is not my fault that the language has been so perverted that use of the
word class is not PC. Class simply means category. There really aren't
good synonyms to use to describe the relative ranks of licenses other than
higher or lower. However I could use class instead of category but I
don't feel like bowing to the pressures of those who are trying to mangle
our language and force their vision of politically correct speach on the
rest of us. When will category become politically incorrect. It never
ends.

that you can't see it can be considered insulting shows yu as something
undesirable



that you think in those terms shows you an elitest


To me, class is synonymous with category. Therefore there is no insult and
no elitism.

and now you demand that I accept that langauge in the way you want

more proof of your elistism

I call you elitist not just becuase of "lowest class" but you general
manner

such as your assumtion that the upgrading will need your help becuase
they will be generals and you are an Extra

You are an elitist

You BTW don't get to decode wether you are being insulting. the reader
does

that you try to inist you van is more evidence of your arogance and
elitism


Like I said "It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist
Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement "

"However I suspect you will be "


As stated, you haven't the power to insult me.

you stated it but I don't believe you

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

an_old_friend wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:

"an Old friend" wrote in message
groups.com...

cut

Dave K8MN


And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have not
only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license
class.

boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there
licenses


And how is factual data considered an insult?


by showing the Speacker as an elistist

That you even think in such terms is insulting

At the introduction of the No Code Tech

Fact: Novice was the lowest class requiring one written and one code test.
Fact: Tech was a "higher" license class requiring the Novice written & Tech
written but not the Novice code and did not grant Novice privileges.
Fact: To get Novice privileges, Techs had to pass the Novice code.

What is insulting about that?


It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement

However I suspect you will be

Dee, there is no dealing with Mr. Morgan at the moment. He does not
seem to be in control of his emotions or his mental faculties.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
cut
What is insulting about that?


It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement

However I suspect you will be

Dee, there is no dealing with Mr. Morgan at the moment. He does not
seem to be in control of his emotions or his mental faculties.

another lie form you Dave 2 in fact

One that it is ever hard to deal with me. it never is hard.

two, that I am not in control of my emotions

Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dee Flint wrote:

cut

What is insulting about that?


It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement

However I suspect you will be

Dee, there is no dealing with Mr. Morgan at the moment. He does not
seem to be in control of his emotions or his mental faculties.


another lie form you Dave 2 in fact

One that it is ever hard to deal with me. it never is hard.

You just called a woman an elitist bitch for posting an accurate
statement. Not hard to deal with you?

two, that I am not in control of my emotions

You are not in control of your emotions. Your quest for victimhood knows
no bounds.


Dave K8MN

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
cut
And how is factual data considered an insult?

by being presented in an insluting manner

you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted

you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs


There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a
degree
of paranoia to so construe it.

how do you expect to be an effective elmer if you can't reconize that
you are being rude


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


And how can one be a successful student if they misinterpret plain language?

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
ink.net...
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dee Flint wrote:

cut

What is insulting about that?


It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement

However I suspect you will be

Dee, there is no dealing with Mr. Morgan at the moment. He does not
seem to be in control of his emotions or his mental faculties.


another lie form you Dave 2 in fact

One that it is ever hard to deal with me. it never is hard.

You just called a woman an elitist bitch for posting an accurate
statement. Not hard to deal with you?

two, that I am not in control of my emotions

You are not in control of your emotions. Your quest for victimhood knows
no bounds.


Dave K8MN


Don't bother to fight him on my behalf. It won't work anyway. Anyone can
read his statements and my statements for themselves and make their own
decision.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...efe5705925 c9

your thread with an admitted stripper
Dave Heil wrote:

You're dumber than a stump. The text found at the url you provided:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Heil Feb 29 2004, 1:06 pm
Newsgroups: alt.west-virginia
From: Dave Heil - Find messages by this author
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:06:08 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 29 2004 1:06 pm
Subject: i got a job stripping

WV Female wrote:

i ride them poles like theres no tomorrow...lol... ok.. ok.. im made it
all up.. sounded good tho.. lol..

Linda,

Have you considered easing up on the caffeine?

Where've you been?

Dave near Cameron
------------------------------------------------------------------

So, 1) no stripper and 2) no flirt on my part.

Mark, you are a complete twit and a fabricator.

not at all look at it and I quote "i got a job stripping" as the title

seems clear enough to me

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...efe5705925 c9

your thread with an admitted stripper
Dave Heil wrote:

You're dumber than a stump. The text found at the url you provided:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Heil Feb 29 2004, 1:06 pm
Newsgroups: alt.west-virginia
From: Dave Heil - Find messages by this author
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:06:08 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 29 2004 1:06 pm
Subject: i got a job stripping

WV Female wrote:

i ride them poles like theres no tomorrow...lol... ok.. ok.. im made it
all up.. sounded good tho.. lol..

Linda,

Have you considered easing up on the caffeine?

Where've you been?

Dave near Cameron
------------------------------------------------------------------

So, 1) no stripper and 2) no flirt on my part.

Mark, you are a complete twit and a fabricator.


not at all look at it and I quote "i got a job stripping" as the title

seems clear enough to me

Sure, it seems clear to you. Now let's talk about how it looks to a
rational human being. What does the body of the message state? Where
are the flirtaceous comments I'm supposed to have made? Give up? They
don't exist.

What you've done is fabricate falsehoods, deliberately and maliciously.
You are simply lying scum.

Dave K8MN