Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...efe5705925 c9 your thread with an admitted stripper Dave Heil wrote: You're dumber than a stump. The text found at the url you provided: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Heil Feb 29 2004, 1:06 pm Newsgroups: alt.west-virginia From: Dave Heil - Find messages by this author Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:06:08 GMT Local: Sun, Feb 29 2004 1:06 pm Subject: i got a job stripping WV Female wrote: i ride them poles like theres no tomorrow...lol... ok.. ok.. im made it all up.. sounded good tho.. lol.. Linda, Have you considered easing up on the caffeine? Where've you been? Dave near Cameron ------------------------------------------------------------------ So, 1) no stripper and 2) no flirt on my part. Mark, you are a complete twit and a fabricator. not at all look at it and I quote "i got a job stripping" as the title seems clear enough to me Sure, it seems clear to you. Now let's talk about how it looks to a rational human being. What does the body of the message state? Where are the flirtaceous comments I'm supposed to have made? Give up? They don't exist. the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited in the past why is this such an issue for you? What you've done is fabricate falsehoods, deliberately and maliciously. You are simply lying scum. No I simply the text and see what I see I was simply mentioning what I found when I made my google search as told me to do No malice there then you demanded I back em up and I did so You are unbalanced and apearntly filled with rage over posts by a person that you claim nobody belives or take seriously Dave K8MN |
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...efe5705925 c9 your thread with an admitted stripper Dave Heil wrote: You're dumber than a stump. The text found at the url you provided: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Heil Feb 29 2004, 1:06 pm Newsgroups: alt.west-virginia From: Dave Heil - Find messages by this author Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:06:08 GMT Local: Sun, Feb 29 2004 1:06 pm Subject: i got a job stripping WV Female wrote: i ride them poles like theres no tomorrow...lol... ok.. ok.. im made it all up.. sounded good tho.. lol.. Linda, Have you considered easing up on the caffeine? Where've you been? Dave near Cameron ------------------------------------------------------------------ So, 1) no stripper and 2) no flirt on my part. Mark, you are a complete twit and a fabricator. not at all look at it and I quote "i got a job stripping" as the title seems clear enough to me Sure, it seems clear to you. Now let's talk about how it looks to a rational human being. What does the body of the message state? Where are the flirtaceous comments I'm supposed to have made? Give up? They don't exist. the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited in the past Not true. That too is a fabrication. why is this such an issue for you? I suppose because you are a lying little SOB posting malicious falsehoods. What you've done is fabricate falsehoods, deliberately and maliciously. You are simply lying scum. No I simply the text and see what I see Yeah, you "simply the text" all right. Perhaps you should have your vision checked. You fabricated. I was simply mentioning what I found when I made my google search as told me to do ....except that what you said you found turned out not to exist. No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. then you demanded I back em up and I did so You backed up nothing and shredded what was left of your credibility. "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut Sure, it seems clear to you. Now let's talk about how it looks to a rational human being. What does the body of the message state? Where are the flirtaceous comments I'm supposed to have made? Give up? They don't exist. the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited in the past Not true. That too is a fabrication. not as I saw it and continue to see it simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave why is this such an issue for you? I suppose because you are a lying little SOB posting malicious falsehoods. Not lying and even if I am an SoB it is rude of you to call my mother a bitch having never met her No flasehood no malicious one Just calling your posts as I see em What you've done is fabricate falsehoods, deliberately and maliciously. You are simply lying scum. No I simply the text and see what I see Yeah, you "simply the text" all right. Perhaps you should have your vision checked. You fabricated. Not at all I was simply mentioning what I found when I made my google search as told me to do ...except that what you said you found turned out not to exist. Seems to to my reading No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. more lies on your part No malice no proof of anything but you are so senitive about it that you are convining that you may have even had an affair with this woman then you demanded I back em up and I did so You backed up nothing and shredded what was left of your credibility. immpossible you cliamed I had none before therefore your statement that I shredded any was a lie or you previous statement was "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 so? This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many ways why are you so frighten of what I say? Dave K8MN |
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut Sure, it seems clear to you. Now let's talk about how it looks to a rational human being. What does the body of the message state? Where are the flirtaceous comments I'm supposed to have made? Give up? They don't exist. the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited in the past Not true. That too is a fabrication. not as I saw it and continue to see it simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave No it isn't. You aren't simply disagreeing. You posted deliberate falsehoods and now you are lying on top of your initial lies. Then again, you're an admitted liar. why is this such an issue for you? I suppose because you are a lying little SOB posting malicious falsehoods. Not lying... Yes, you have lied and you continue to do so. ...and even if I am an SoB it is rude of you to call my mother a bitch having never met her I guess you'll have to learn to live with that pain. You're not just any SOB, you're a lying little SOB. No flasehood no malicious one Just calling your posts as I see em It is most interesting that you rant and rail at others as you call them all "lier", but that you deny, over and over, your own untruths, even in the face of easily obtainable proof. What you've done is fabricate falsehoods, deliberately and maliciously. You are simply lying scum. No I simply the text and see what I see Yeah, you "simply the text" all right. Perhaps you should have your vision checked. You fabricated. Not at all Yes, all. I was simply mentioning what I found when I made my google search as told me to do ...except that what you said you found turned out not to exist. Seems to to my reading Then again, you're dyslexic. No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. more lies on your part See what I mean? You call others liars when the truth is evident. You aren't wrapped too tight. No malice no proof of anything but you are so senitive about it that you are convining that you may have even had an affair with this woman I'm convining? How does one convine? Well, Lieutenant/Colonel Morgan, you're about as goofy as they come. then you demanded I back em up and I did so You backed up nothing and shredded what was left of your credibility. immpossible you cliamed I had none before Great. Google it up. therefore your statement that I shredded any was a lie or you previous statement was Naw, Mark, you're lying again, just to keep in practice. "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 so? "So?" That's the best you can do? "So?" It is bad enough for you to be dishonest. You take it to a new level, trumpeting it from the rooftops. This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many ways ....yet you find it important enough to show up on a regular basis these days. why are you so frighten of what I say? Frightened? You must have come to a faulty conclusion, Colonel. I have no fear at all of you. You're a perverse individual, lacking in redeeming qualities. I see you as pitiful. In one night, you've threatened death to an individual and you've called a very nice woman an elitist bitch. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited in the past Not true. That too is a fabrication. not as I saw it and continue to see it simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave No it isn't. You aren't simply disagreeing. You posted deliberate falsehoods and now you are lying on top of your initial lies. Then again, you're an admitted liar. No I am simply reading em the way I see em No falsehood at all why are you so threatened by that? cut No flasehood no malicious one Just calling your posts as I see em It is most interesting that you rant and rail at others as you call them all "lier", but that you deny, over and over, your own untruths, even in the face of easily obtainable proof. If there was unturth id be prepared to admit it from where I am siting you wer exchanging a number of flirtaous pots with a Bisexual female o a Hg mostly of peronal ads cut ...except that what you said you found turned out not to exist. Seems to to my reading Then again, you're dyslexic. yes I am your point? No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. more lies on your part See what I mean? You call others liars when the truth is evident. You aren't wrapped too tight. no I don't see what you mean the turth is I see your post as flirtaous that is a fact that you can call them something else in your mind has nothing to do with that fact No malice no proof of anything but you are so senitive about it that you are convining that you may have even had an affair with this woman I'm convining? How does one convine? Well, Lieutenant/Colonel Morgan, you're about as goofy as they come. by protesting your inocence of such a trival matter so violently then you demanded I back em up and I did so You backed up nothing and shredded what was left of your credibility. immpossible you cliamed I had none before Great. Google it up. already done therefore your statement that I shredded any was a lie or you previous statement was Naw, Mark, you're lying again, just to keep in practice. no need for that Dave "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 so? "So?" That's the best you can do? "So?" It is bad enough for you to be dishonest. You take it to a new level, trumpeting it from the rooftops. It isn't bad at all as far as Im concerned I don't owe you turth esp when you don't deliver it in reuturn so is the answer You and Stevie keep projecting your values are you so stupid you can't understand I don't accept them? This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many ways ...yet you find it important enough to show up on a regular basis these days. It kills times why are you so frighten of what I say? Frightened? You must have come to a faulty conclusion, Colonel. I have no fear at all of you. You're a perverse individual, lacking in redeeming qualities. I see you as pitiful. Then why are you concerned about my posts? In one night, you've threatened death to an individual and you've called a very nice woman an elitist bitch. Done neither Dave K8MN |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message cut And how is factual data considered an insult? by being presented in an insluting manner you address someone in insulting terms at some of them will be insulted you have insulted the Novices and the various types of techs There were no insulting phrases or words in my post. It would take a degree of paranoia to so construe it. how do you expect to be an effective elmer if you can't reconize that you are being rude Dee D. Flint, N8UZE And how can one be a successful student if they misinterpret plain language? making your meaning clear is your job as the elmer,at least by the standards you were trying to ram down my throat a few weeks ago. you are the pone comunicating so it is your job to be clear But in answer to your question it is certainly possible for any competant intructor to over come misunderstanding and still You elitist bitch the question stands, "how do you expect to be an effective elmer if you can't reconize that you are being rude?" your manner is insulting in your posts you come off as a snob, at best you are evasive, rude and lazy and always ready to tell another what they should be doing How can anyone call anything but an elitist bitch and be honest? Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Believe what you wish. However, my students have a near 100% pass rate on both theory and code on their first try. I refuse to spar with some one who chooses to act like an idiot so I will respond to no more of your posts until you regain your equilibrium. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ink.net... cut Dave K8MN Don't bother to fight him on my behalf. It won't work anyway. Anyone can read his statements and my statements for themselves and make their own decision. don't flatter yourself Dave is not fighting on YOUR behalf is just fighting becuase likes to fight Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
an Old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited in the past Not true. That too is a fabrication. not as I saw it and continue to see it simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave No it isn't. You aren't simply disagreeing. You posted deliberate falsehoods and now you are lying on top of your initial lies. Then again, you're an admitted liar. No I am simply reading em the way I see em No falsehood at all why are you so threatened by that? You keep using the term "threatened". I don't feel threatened, Mark. You have manufactured stories. You have been called on them. Irrefutable proof that your stories are fabrications has been introduced. You continue to lie. cut No flasehood no malicious one Just calling your posts as I see em It is most interesting that you rant and rail at others as you call them all "lier", but that you deny, over and over, your own untruths, even in the face of easily obtainable proof. If there was unturth id be prepared to admit it According to your own rules, you'd be prepared to tell further lies. from where I am siting you wer exchanging a number of flirtaous pots with a Bisexual female o a Hg mostly of peronal ads ....and since you are aware of the untruth of your statement, anyone can see that you would like about anything at any time. cut ...except that what you said you found turned out not to exist. Seems to to my reading Then again, you're dyslexic. yes I am your point? Yes, you are my point. No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. more lies on your part See what I mean? You call others liars when the truth is evident. You aren't wrapped too tight. no I don't see what you mean the turth is I see your post as flirtaous that is a fact Actually it isn't a fact. It is simply another of your claims. Google archives show otherwise. that you can call them something else in your mind has nothing to do with that fact You aren't living in reality. No malice no proof of anything but you are so senitive about it that you are convining that you may have even had an affair with this woman I'm convining? How does one convine? Well, Lieutenant/Colonel Morgan, you're about as goofy as they come. by protesting your inocence of such a trival matter so violently Oh? That's "convining", is it? I'm not doing anything "so violently". I've presented concrete evidence that what you have claimed is a fabrication. I've done that consistently, not violently. then you demanded I back em up and I did so You backed up nothing and shredded what was left of your credibility. immpossible you cliamed I had none before Great. Google it up. already done It is? Where, pray tell, did you post it? therefore your statement that I shredded any was a lie or you previous statement was Naw, Mark, you're lying again, just to keep in practice. no need for that Dave The record of your lying shows that you need improvement. "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 so? "So?" That's the best you can do? "So?" It is bad enough for you to be dishonest. You take it to a new level, trumpeting it from the rooftops. It isn't bad at all as far as Im concerned I don't owe you turth esp when you don't deliver it in reuturn You'd first have to be able to recognize truth. You can't. so is the answer What is the question? You and Stevie keep projecting your values are you so stupid you can't understand I don't accept them? Anyone can understand that you don't accept many values. Not everyone subscribes to the idea that you can manufacture any story you'd like, whether true or not. This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many ways ...yet you find it important enough to show up on a regular basis these days. It kills times So does watching paint dry. why are you so frighten of what I say? Frightened? You must have come to a faulty conclusion, Colonel. I have no fear at all of you. You're a perverse individual, lacking in redeeming qualities. I see you as pitiful. Then why are you concerned about my posts? Why am I concerned? Because you've manufactured outright and deliberate lies about me, that's why. You seem to feel that you have complete liberty to do so. In one night, you've threatened death to an individual and you've called a very nice woman an elitist bitch. Done neither You've done both, but you have to continue lying. It is your nature. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: an Old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut not as I saw it and continue to see it simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave No it isn't. You aren't simply disagreeing. You posted deliberate falsehoods and now you are lying on top of your initial lies. Then again, you're an admitted liar. No I am simply reading em the way I see em No falsehood at all why are you so threatened by that? You keep using the term "threatened". I don't feel threatened, Mark. You have manufactured stories. You have been called on them. Irrefutable proof that your stories are fabrications has been introduced. You continue to lie. I use the term threatened for want of a better term I have not manfucatured stories I have reported on my reading of what I found when I did the search you inistsed I do Indeed I still don't understand your beef nothing wrong with flirting with her and yet you are in what looks like a rage over the suggestion cut No flasehood no malicious one Just calling your posts as I see em It is most interesting that you rant and rail at others as you call them all "lier", but that you deny, over and over, your own untruths, even in the face of easily obtainable proof. If there was unturth id be prepared to admit it According to your own rules, you'd be prepared to tell further lies. Yes indeed if I felt threatened nothing realy threatening her no reason to lie from where I am siting you wer exchanging a number of flirtaous pots with a Bisexual female o a Hg mostly of peronal ads ...and since you are aware of the untruth of your statement, anyone can see that you would like about anything at any time. I am aware of truth of that statement she is Bisexual by her own words and you were flirting with her over what looks like a period of some weeks cut No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. more lies on your part See what I mean? You call others liars when the truth is evident. You aren't wrapped too tight. no I don't see what you mean the turth is I see your post as flirtaous that is a fact Actually it isn't a fact. It is simply another of your claims. Google archives show otherwise. Google archives can't show any such thing It is a fact that I see your posting as flirtaous\ wether any one else does is another matter, but does not affect the FACT I see them as such More proof of your lack of conection to reality that you can call them something else in your mind has nothing to do with that fact You aren't living in reality. I certainly am, you OTOH don't seem to be cut down on the BS "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 so? "So?" That's the best you can do? "So?" It is bad enough for you to be dishonest. You take it to a new level, trumpeting it from the rooftops. It isn't bad at all as far as Im concerned I don't owe you turth esp when you don't deliver it in reuturn You'd first have to be able to recognize truth. You can't. I certainly you can't reconize turth from lies your opinions from facts or that simple facts that not everyone has to see the same thing the same wya you do Grow up and stop your little temper tantruam, if you can so is the answer What is the question? You and Stevie keep projecting your values are you so stupid you can't understand I don't accept them? Anyone can understand that you don't accept many values. Not everyone subscribes to the idea that you can manufacture any story you'd like, whether true or not. More Davie fabrications, more lies My values are simply different than your This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many ways ...yet you find it important enough to show up on a regular basis these days. It kills times So does watching paint dry. But this is much more fun as another poster (in a thread not so far away) put it, like the morbid fasination of watching a slow motion train wreck or something like that why are you so frighten of what I say? Frightened? You must have come to a faulty conclusion, Colonel. I have no fear at all of you. You're a perverse individual, lacking in redeeming qualities. I see you as pitiful. Then why are you concerned about my posts? Why am I concerned? Because you've manufactured outright and deliberate lies about me, that's why. You seem to feel that you have complete liberty to do so. One I have manufactured nothing. I have formed an opinion you disgree with. Two, in point of fact, if I CHOOSE I have complete liberty to do so, just as you have (and exercise) the complete liberty to manufacture lies about me my beliefs, my very existance In one night, you've threatened death to an individual and you've called a very nice woman an elitist bitch. Done neither You've done both, but you have to continue lying. It is your nature. I have done neither Stevie was merely reminded again that is to stay away from me or face the results, and I have called a not nice woman an elitist bitch, a label I point out she does not object too No lie no continuing what wasn't started grow up show a bit of class Dave K8MN |
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an Old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut not as I saw it and continue to see it simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave No it isn't. You aren't simply disagreeing. You posted deliberate falsehoods and now you are lying on top of your initial lies. Then again, you're an admitted liar. No I am simply reading em the way I see em No falsehood at all why are you so threatened by that? You keep using the term "threatened". I don't feel threatened, Mark. You have manufactured stories. You have been called on them. Irrefutable proof that your stories are fabrications has been introduced. You continue to lie. I use the term threatened for want of a better term There are plenty of words which could be used to describe the way I feel. "Threatened" is not among them. I have not manfucatured stories I have reported on my reading of what I found when I did the search you inistsed I do Your new word "manfucatured" is pretty descriptive but I'll stick with "manufactured", "false" or "fabricated". Those words are apt descriptions of your dishonest and untruthful actions. Indeed I still don't understand your beef nothing wrong with flirting with her and yet you are in what looks like a rage over the suggestion Rage? I'm not in a rage at all, Mark. I'm insistent that you have written deliberate and malicious falsehoods. There are no shades of gray here. There is nothing open to interpretation. There are just lies told by you. cut No flasehood no malicious one Just calling your posts as I see em It is most interesting that you rant and rail at others as you call them all "lier", but that you deny, over and over, your own untruths, even in the face of easily obtainable proof. If there was unturth id be prepared to admit it According to your own rules, you'd be prepared to tell further lies. Yes indeed if I felt threatened nothing realy threatening her no reason to lie It is quite apparent from viewing your past posts to this newsgroup, you don't need a reason to lie. You simply lie. from where I am siting you wer exchanging a number of flirtaous pots with a Bisexual female o a Hg mostly of peronal ads ...and since you are aware of the untruth of your statement, anyone can see that you would like about anything at any time. I am aware of truth of that statement she is Bisexual by her own words... Sorry, that is a lie. and you were flirting with her over what looks like a period of some weeks Sorry, that is another lie. cut No malice there There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies. more lies on your part See what I mean? You call others liars when the truth is evident. You aren't wrapped too tight. no I don't see what you mean the turth is I see your post as flirtaous that is a fact Actually it isn't a fact. It is simply another of your claims. Google archives show otherwise. Google archives can't show any such thing Yes, Mark, the archives do show what was said and by whom. The facts are quite different than your claims. It is a fact that I see your posting as flirtaous\ You see yourself as a victim. You see Dee as an elitist bitch. That doesn't mean that those things are true. It only means that your point of view is skewed. wether any one else does is another matter, but does not affect the FACT I see them as such Huh-uh, Mark. A fact would be that you *say* you see them as such--but you're a known liar. More proof of your lack of conection to reality I don't think you are anyone I'd want to ask about reality. that you can call them something else in your mind has nothing to do with that fact You aren't living in reality. I certainly am, you OTOH don't seem to be cut down on the BS I'm cutting down some BS right now--your own. "My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should it bother me?" -- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000 so? "So?" That's the best you can do? "So?" It is bad enough for you to be dishonest. You take it to a new level, trumpeting it from the rooftops. It isn't bad at all as far as Im concerned I don't owe you turth esp when you don't deliver it in reuturn You'd first have to be able to recognize truth. You can't. I certainly you can't reconize turth from lies your opinions from facts or that simple facts that not everyone has to see the same thing the same wya you do Mark, I know you've been told this before, but it bears repeating. You are a twit. Grow up and stop your little temper tantruam, if you can so is the answer What is the question? You and Stevie keep projecting your values are you so stupid you can't understand I don't accept them? Anyone can understand that you don't accept many values. Not everyone subscribes to the idea that you can manufacture any story you'd like, whether true or not. More Davie fabrications, more lies Please point out the fabrications or lies in my statement. My values are simply different than your ....than my what? This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many ways ...yet you find it important enough to show up on a regular basis these days. It kills times So does watching paint dry. But this is much more fun as another poster (in a thread not so far away) put it, like the morbid fasination of watching a slow motion train wreck or something like that ....only you're on the train. why are you so frighten of what I say? Frightened? You must have come to a faulty conclusion, Colonel. I have no fear at all of you. You're a perverse individual, lacking in redeeming qualities. I see you as pitiful. Then why are you concerned about my posts? Why am I concerned? Because you've manufactured outright and deliberate lies about me, that's why. You seem to feel that you have complete liberty to do so. One I have manufactured nothing. I have formed an opinion you disgree with. No, you have spread deliberate lies. You are a stranger to the truth. Two, in point of fact, if I CHOOSE I have complete liberty to do so, just as you have (and exercise) the complete liberty to manufacture lies about me my beliefs, my very existance You may choose to fabricate and lie regarding your very existence. You have no right to do so about my existence. If you choose to lie and you are found out, you must pay the consequences for your actions. That is personal responsibility. In one night, you've threatened death to an individual and you've called a very nice woman an elitist bitch. Done neither You've done both, but you have to continue lying. It is your nature. I have done neither I have to insist. You've done both and on more than one occasion. Stevie was merely reminded again that is to stay away from me or face the results... The results? You threatened to kill him with a gun. The words you used exist. You can't deny them. and I have called a not nice woman an elitist bitch, a label I point out she does not object too I have never observed Dee to be other than pleasant. In her recent dealings with you, you have tested her. She has still not stooped to your level. You have no way to know if she objects to being called such a name by you. No lie no continuing what wasn't started That's right but you are continuing and you did those things initially. grow up show a bit of class Who would tell you if something were classy or not? Dave K8MN |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com