"Mark" wrote in message
...


Amazing that they can't afford a day off from work (which one doesn't even
have to worry about), or find someone to swap days, yet they can afford to
buy
scanners and video equipment to follow police around. Very interesting.


Apparently you can't read... Nobody followed the police around... And what
does "swapping days" have anything to do with not being able to afford
something? Swapping days isn't going to magically raise a persons pay...

Video equipment, where do you get this stuff, pull it out of your ass??
Nobody has any kind of "video equipment", unless you are talking about a TV
and VCR at home...


Well, then, there you go. You got the permit. Knew what the law said,
yet
chose to break it anyway (well, not YOU, but....)

No sympathies here.


Still can't read... Nobody broke ANY law, PERIOD. Nobody followed anybody,
nobody did anything except live a normal, everyday life. Can't comprehend
that or what?

No need to read beyond this either. Federal law may allow specific
freedoms
with regards to scanning (or anything else for that matter). State laws
cannot undo this. In other words, the state level cannot grant more
freedom
than the Federal level - BUT, the state level most certainly can impose
further restrictions - which Michigan appears to have done.


State law doesn't restrict anything any further than Federal law with regard
to the "publishing" and "following" circumstances that I have been
discussing.

I'm not sure why you insist on arguing over this crap. I'm just stating
things that happened that were unjust, yet you seem to insist that they
never happened. You, of all people, would have no clue as to how things
transpired, so why argue the opposition? It's people like you that make
topic discussions like this into worthless threads; you think you know
everything about everything, yet don't have a clue. You just speculate
things, yet spew them forth as if it were fact...