Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your a riot, CW is as out of date as smoke signals or beating on drums to
communicate. Welcome to the 21st century, through mans existance we have always looked for better ways to communicate, telegraph was replaced by telephones, spark gap transmissions were 'replaced' by 'phone' service in 2 way radios, AM modulation was replaced (pretty much) by FM modulation, and now is transitioning to digital. Sure your 'free' to use CW to communicate ( to whowever will still have the outdated skills to do so in the near future), you are also 'free' to drive a horse and buggy to work, and use an outhouse if you so desire. Just don't 'EXPECT' the rest of the modern world to hold on to your outdated and archaic ideas. "Clem" wrote in message . 97.136... Diana Satyr wrote in : In article 36, Clem wrote: "Douche Bag" wrote in ps.com: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/27/bu...l?_r=1&em&ex=1 167 368400&en=19d9459b705ce909&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin That ancient code as you put it is a language made in heaven. When Amtor, Pactor, this TOR or that TOR, SSTV and even phone can't make it through, the Lord was kind enough to provide us with cw. One thing you failed to notice was that the FCC did not do away with CW. No no no ... it can still be used. Wait until contest time you witless twit! CW blows phone away when conditions are tough. If you want to see skill and savvy at work then build a Captain Decoder kit and "listen" in. Of course that's providing you have such skills. You think your all that because you took a written test and passed? HA! Dig out a test sheet from before the age of transistors and chips. You'll fast discover my friend that earlier on in this world people developed skills, real skills, not a fast or cheap introduction with a yellow and black book befittingly described as "For Dummies!" I can see the day when the station you want to talk to the most can't hear a peep out of you because you don't have the skills or knowledge to do much more than turn equipment on or off. Yes sir, that's where Amateur Radio it's heading to, a bargain basement of radio licenses because nobody could set the kid straight and teach him a few dits and dahs. Impress me and learn a new trick besides roll over and play dead! Now things are just as they should be. Folks (mostly old) who like code are free to use it. The few folks who want to learn it are likewise free to do so. But no-one anymore has to go through said agonizingly boring process just to become a ham. Moonman No, things are NOT as they should be. CW never was and never will be an "older generation" issue. There was a purpose and reason for knowing cw and being required to pass a cw test to hold a license. Unfortunately, the F.C.C. lost sight of that issue and grew weary of ham want-to-be's screaming Gimmie! Gimmie! This new ruling is just another example of how higher authority gets tired of the whining and crying and gives in. Bad move. I stand on what I said earlier. Some people think getting a license should be as easy as ordering a Big Mac. I suppose we should do the same thing for drivers and pilots licensing too. Makes me feel real secure. NOT! Perhaps you never came across an instructor or training package suited to your level of learning. That doesn't mean it's difficult to learn or your incapable. I was a VE and I have taught people between 7 and 80, literally. I have taught cw to people with disabilities who rather than opt for a waiver that would have made licensing easier for them, kept at it until they passed. There is more than one way to pass a cw test. Only once had I witnessed someone who after 5 attempts was allowed to take the test by other than conventional means. When he was told he passed he almost fell out of his chair. New hams today just want it easier. You didn't win anything because the F.C.C. lifted the requirment, you lost the ability to be apart of something that could have expanded your horizons. Don't you feel better now that you impossed a self limitation on yourself? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|