Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Apr., 21:45, blitz wrote:
It's all my receivers. I dx fairly regularly, AM and FM. I can get adjacent stations next to some strong locals (who don't run IBOC). Most contemporary commercial radios are not designed for DX on MW. They are designed for local stations. But try it on your own. How wide is the splatter on your receivers? It depends on the radio. I will say some of my hi-fidelity radios sound like total crap. As far as the splatter, obviously you're going to get the distant stations covered up by the local station's sidebands. But again, DXers are in the minority and the radio manufacturers are catering to the majority of people who tend to exclusively listen to local stations. Simple economics. -- Stephanie Weil New York City, USA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I love them naked old crazy wimmins.
cuhulin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Metinks I needs to slap (I have to go peee,I fell down,,,,,, help me me
pk mlelf up,dogy cuhulin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Bueberrydoggy whas hat
cuu;in |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Apr 2007 07:17:27 -0700, "Stephanie Weil"
wrote: On 4 Apr., 21:45, blitz wrote: Most contemporary commercial radios are not designed for DX on MW. They are designed for local stations. That is ridiculous. It depends on the radio. I will say some of my hi-fidelity radios sound like total crap. That makes no sense. But again, DXers are in the minority and the radio manufacturers are catering to the majority of people who tend to exclusively listen to local stations. Simple economics. Ever driven cross-country? At night? Ever lived more than 30 miles outside of town, or in a part of a city that wasn't built up when the AM stations were built? My 2007 SUV has a very high-performance AM radio and I can hear stations 400+ miles away very nicely, thank-you. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 9:57 pm, David wrote:
That is ridiculous. No. Most manufacturers choose to devote more attention to the FM band. AM on modern commercial radios (and I'm talking the kind of set you'd have at work or in the kitchen on top of the fridge, not a dedicated SWL set like a Drake or Transoceanic) is practically DEAF! Some of the name-brand radios are slightly better, but they're still nowhere near what they were even 20 or 30 years ago. Even my Kloss Tivoli Model 1 tuner (which is very great on FM) is pretty much only good for local AM stations). That makes no sense. Listen to an AM station doing IBOC on a high-fidelity radio like a Kloss Tivoli, Sangean WR-1 or even a Boston Acoustic's Recepter. You'll hear the station sound hissy and you'll notice the audio "clip" because of the sidebands (thanks to the wide-band tuner) and the further compression of the analog portion of the signal. And that's with the radio tuned correctly. So basically your US$100.00 radio is left sounding worse than the speaker on an answering machine. Ever driven cross-country? At night? A few times. I can drive from New York to Boston or even almost to Chicago without changing the station. But how many people do you think are going to put up with the swishy, wavy audio? The other people that were in the car with me could not STAND it. One even complained about it making her sea-sick. So I hunted for local signals, mostly on FM to keep the passengers happy. My 2007 SUV has a very high-performance AM radio and I can hear stations 400+ miles away very nicely, thank-you. Car radios usually have always had better front ends than most table radios used in the house. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Apr 2007 20:22:32 -0700, "Stephanie Weil"
wrote: On Apr 5, 9:57 pm, David wrote: That is ridiculous. No. Most manufacturers choose to devote more attention to the FM band. AM on modern commercial radios (and I'm talking the kind of set you'd have at work or in the kitchen on top of the fridge, not a dedicated SWL set like a Drake or Transoceanic) is practically DEAF! Some of the name-brand radios are slightly better, but they're still nowhere near what they were even 20 or 30 years ago. Even my Kloss Tivoli Model 1 tuner (which is very great on FM) is pretty much only good for local AM stations). That makes no sense. Listen to an AM station doing IBOC on a high-fidelity radio like a Kloss Tivoli, Sangean WR-1 or even a Boston Acoustic's Recepter. You'll hear the station sound hissy and you'll notice the audio "clip" because of the sidebands (thanks to the wide-band tuner) and the further compression of the analog portion of the signal. And that's with the radio tuned correctly. So basically your US$100.00 radio is left sounding worse than the speaker on an answering machine. Ever driven cross-country? At night? A few times. I can drive from New York to Boston or even almost to Chicago without changing the station. But how many people do you think are going to put up with the swishy, wavy audio? The other people that were in the car with me could not STAND it. One even complained about it making her sea-sick. So I hunted for local signals, mostly on FM to keep the passengers happy. My 2007 SUV has a very high-performance AM radio and I can hear stations 400+ miles away very nicely, thank-you. Car radios usually have always had better front ends than most table radios used in the house. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA You have a very Northeast-centric view of things. It is many hundreds of miles between big cities out here and ''DX'' is very much a part of the radio landscape. While my Tivoli Model One may have crappy AM, my $30 Walkman is a DX screamer, except now the IBOC from 1140 in Sacramento and 1160 in Salt Lake messes up the 1150 from Los Angeles. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 6, 9:10 am, David wrote:
my $30 Walkman is a DX screamer, except now the IBOC from 1140 in Sacramento and 1160 in Salt Lake messes up the 1150 from Los Angeles. How old is your Walkman? The only Walkman I've ever used that had a sensitive AM tuner was a 1980s model that allowed me to pick up all the long-distance stations I could normally pick up with my electric table radios. While the more recent Walkmans, the tuners properly pick up all the local stations, they're hardly DX machines. The same thing applies for ghetto-blasters. The last ones of those with a GOOD sensitive AM tuner were the ones that came out in the early-mid 1990s that usually included a couple of SW bands. There's less people listening to AM radio, so the manufacturers aren't going to devote resources to a feature that's not going to help sell the unit. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 1:17�pm, "Stephanie Weil" wrote:
On 4 Apr., 21:45, blitz wrote: It's all my receivers. I dx fairly regularly, AM and FM. I can get adjacent stations next to some strong locals (who don't run IBOC). Most contemporary commercial radios are not designed for DX on MW. They are designed for local stations. But try it on your own. How wide is the splatter on your receivers? It depends on the radio. *I will say some of my hi-fidelity radios sound like total crap. *As far as the splatter, obviously you're going to get the distant stations covered up by the local station's sidebands. But again, DXers are in the minority and the radio manufacturers are catering to the majority of people who tend to exclusively listen to local stations. *Simple economics. -- Stephanie Weil New York City, USA Simple economics - hdradio.com, the go-to site for further information on HD Radio, including finding those secret stations-between-the- stations is almost dead: http://www.statsaholic.com/hdradio.com If bunches of HD radios were being sold, there would be significant activity at hdradio.com. LOL !!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eye-On-IBOC - Looking for Information about IBOC and HD Radio | Shortwave | |||
** One Million FR.EE Visitors ** | Homebrew | |||
100+million now cannot see your ads! | Scanner | |||
100+million now cannot see your ads! | General | |||
$200 million a day. | Shortwave |