Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
On Apr 6, 12:25 pm, wrote:
RHF wrote: On Apr 6, 5:29 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: RHF wrote: = = = On Apr 5, 7:22 am, "David Eduardo" = = = wrote: - - RHF turns his back on his RRS buddies... - votes to turn RRS into rec.radio.David-Eduardo-admiration-society - - Gee, thanks a lot RHF. - I hope you and your new IBOC buddies live happily ever after. Why Thank You El-Fake-O-Eduardo -and- You remain a Nobody using someone else's name. FWIW - I have suggested more than once that the real "David Eduardo" Post It Elsewhere -but- at least he posts under his own name and stands behind his posts. Where as you are a 'fake' in many ways that go beyond what you post here and there and every where . . . - - - El-Fake-O-Eduardo Two Words "Get Real !" and i simply remain 'rhf' = a real happy fella ~ RHF . I am just a Humble and Resolute Citizen-Soldier in - "The Never Ending Battle for Truth, Justice, and the American Way ! " http://www.supermanhomepage.com/comi...=articles/josh... . Speaking of "Citizen Soldiers" let us remember the US National Guard and the Men and Women who Serve in it. NATIONAL GUARD =http://www.ngb.army.mil/About/default.aspx I AM THE GUARD =http://www.ngb.army.mil/about/Iamtheguard.aspx Defending Our Freedoms - Guarding America SING IT ! =http://www.ngb.army.mil/about/song.aspx . . . .- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - El-Fake-O-Eduardo, (OT) : More "Blank" Postings -by- You Got It ! - El-Fake-O-Eduardo I can surmise that these three post by you tell us a lot about you without even knowing your name. * Trained female slave looking for fun * dyads and triads and quads; oh my! * Trained female slave looking for fun Who you really are may be just a 'rumor' : But What You Are Is Clearly In Evidence [.] and i simply remain 'rhf' = a real happy fella ~ RHF . Speaking of "You Got It ! {U-Got-It} -by- Johnny Canales http://www.amazon.com/You-Got-Johnny.../dp/B000008DYP El Show de Johnny Canales JOHNNY CANALES =http://www.johnnycanales.com/ {El Show / Del Show -only- in America - Not That's Tex-Mex Lingo} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Canales http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tejano Tejano Music you can hear it on the Radio ! . . . . Don't pay any mind to these analog idiots, RHF. This group is about HD Radio now and you, me and David (the real one, not the fake ass) are getting it off on the right foot. As soon as we chase off all these SWL fools the level of dialogue should rise quickly. Just hang in there. You're with us now, buddy!!!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "rustynail1" and the 'el-fake-o-eduardo' have a few things in common. ~ RHF |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
Tommy Tootles wrote:
dxAce wrote: They're both fakes. Takes one to know one! This is coming from an EXPERT on fakes---a fake "ace" and a fake injun. Let's give credit where credit is due. He's only 5/6 fake as far as being a real Native goes. On the other hand, he *IS* a 100 percent true DRUNK. mike |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
dxAce wrote: They're both fakes. Tommy Tootles wrote: Takes one to know one! This is coming from an EXPERT on fakes---a fake "ace" and a fake injun. On Apr 8, 5:47 pm, m II wrote: Let's give credit where credit is due. He's only 5/6 fake as far as being a real Native goes. On the other hand, he *IS* a 100 percent true DRUNK. mike RHF wrote: MIke - "5/6" ? ? ? - Where Do You Get 5/6ths ? ? ? It came from the fake "ace" himself when he claimed being "1/6" native American. Thank you for pointing out yet more evidence of his fakery! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
On Apr 9, 3:34 am, Tommy Tootles wrote:
dxAce wrote: They're both fakes. Tommy Tootles wrote: Takes one to know one! This is coming from an EXPERT on fakes---a fake "ace" and a fake injun. On Apr 8, 5:47 pm, m II wrote: Let's give credit where credit is due. He's only 5/6 fake as far as being a real Native goes. On the other hand, he *IS* a 100 percent true DRUNK. mike RHF wrote: MIke - "5/6" ? ? ? - Where Do You Get 5/6ths ? ? ? It came from the fake "ace" himself when he claimed being "1/6" native American. Thank you for pointing out yet more evidence of his fakery! TT - One-Sixth (1/6) [16.67%] Is Very Possible By : Having - One Great Grand Parent = 12.5% (1/8th) + + + + + Plus + + + + + Also Having - One Great Great Grand Parent = 6.25% (1/16th) Which is 3/16ths or 18.75% -and- 1/6 equals 16.67% sound like 1/6th is an 'about' right to me ~ RHF |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
RHF wrote:
On Apr 9, 3:34 am, Tommy Tootles wrote: dxAce wrote: They're both fakes. Tommy Tootles wrote: Takes one to know one! This is coming from an EXPERT on fakes---a fake "ace" and a fake injun. On Apr 8, 5:47 pm, m II wrote: Let's give credit where credit is due. He's only 5/6 fake as far as being a real Native goes. On the other hand, he *IS* a 100 percent true DRUNK. mike RHF wrote: MIke - "5/6" ? ? ? - Where Do You Get 5/6ths ? ? ? It came from the fake "ace" himself when he claimed being "1/6" native American. Thank you for pointing out yet more evidence of his fakery! TT - One-Sixth (1/6) [16.67%] Is Very Possible By : Having - One Great Grand Parent = 12.5% (1/8th) + + + + + Plus + + + + + Also Having - One Great Great Grand Parent = 6.25% (1/16th) Which is 3/16ths or 18.75% -and- 1/6 equals 16.67% sound like 1/6th is an 'about' right to me ~ RHF . . . . Wow, your math is Almost As Con-Vo-Luted As Your Punctuation! Thanks for your attempt to bail him out, but IMHO he is still a fake. First, I'm sure the fake "ace" was not putting that fine of a point on the math. But the real nail in his fakery coffin is that at one time, he posted he was 100% (6/6) native. It seems that -HIS- math varies in direct proportion to how much fire-water he has consumed. Finally, I guess 16% is "about" 18%, but I'm sure glad you're not working in MY payroll department. ~:-) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
Tommy Tootles wrote:
Wow, your math is Almost As Con-Vo-Luted As Your Punctuation! ....which is why I don't read his posts. Imagine what that crap does to a blind person who reads usenet news with a speech program. Most likely it understands use of "" for quoting text, but on the rest of his crap, there's just no hope. I call his writing style "Tinfoil-hat English" because that's how usenet conspiracy theorists used to write as well. -- Eric F. Richards "This book reads like a headache on paper." http://www.cnn.com/2001/CAREER/readi...one/index.html |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
On Apr 9, 10:26 am, Tommy Tootles wrote:
RHF wrote: On Apr 9, 3:34 am, Tommy Tootles wrote: dxAce wrote: They're both fakes. Tommy Tootles wrote: Takes one to know one! This is coming from an EXPERT on fakes---a fake "ace" and a fake injun. On Apr 8, 5:47 pm, m II wrote: Let's give credit where credit is due. He's only 5/6 fake as far as being a real Native goes. On the other hand, he *IS* a 100 percent true DRUNK. mike RHF wrote: MIke - "5/6" ? ? ? - Where Do You Get 5/6ths ? ? ? It came from the fake "ace" himself when he claimed being "1/6" native American. Thank you for pointing out yet more evidence of his fakery! TT - One-Sixth (1/6) [16.67%] Is Very Possible By : Having - One Great Grand Parent = 12.5% (1/8th) + + + + + Plus + + + + + Also Having - One Great Great Grand Parent = 6.25% (1/16th) Which is 3/16ths or 18.75% -and- 1/6 equals 16.67% sound like 1/6th is an 'about' right to me ~ RHF . . . . Wow, your math is Almost As Con-Vo-Luted As Your Punctuation! Thanks for your attempt to bail him out, but IMHO he is still a fake. First, I'm sure the fake "ace" was not putting that fine of a point on the math. But the real nail in his fakery coffin is that at one time, he posted he was 100% (6/6) native. It seems that -HIS- math varies in direct proportion to how much fire-water he has consumed. Finally, I guess 16% is "about" 18%, but I'm sure glad you're not working in MY payroll department. ~:-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - TT, Given the 'relative' Value of the Numbers involve in Calculating the Percentage or Fraction of a Persons Blood-Line based on Normal Pairings : 100% (1/1) 50% (1/2) 25% (1/4th) 12.5% (1/8th) 6.75% (1/16th) 6.75% (1/32th) Then "The-Best-Fit would be 18.75% (3/16th) as being Closest Too 16.67% (1/6) DOH ! It's an "About" which is an Approximation that is both Reasonable and Rational for the Subject of Blood-Line Fractions and Percentages -which- Is entirely differenct from "Doing-the-Math" Related to Processing your Payroll. numb3rs only have meaning - when they are understood in the context of the subject they relate too ~ RHF |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
RHF IS JUST TOO SMART FOR YOU SWL LOSERS!!!!!!!!!
I am Scotch Irish American African.Everybody's Ancestors originated in
Africa millions of years ago. cuhulin |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|