Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
I am looking for a portable FM receiver that well perform well. My ideal radio: 1. Portable. Does not have to be pocket-able, but that would be great. I've seen the Grundig g5 and that size would be fine. Smaller is better of course, but performance more important. I use a Tivoli PAL at the moment, and would like something is not smaller, in a better form factor for portability. 2. Able to pull a signal in a concrete building, basement, manage interference. I currently lug a Tivoli PAL around work. I love the PAL's sound. It pulls signals in our building better than any other radio (junk) I have access to here. But at times, it does have a hard time. In the basement and in the lab, it can have a lot of noise in the signal as well as a weak signal. If I touch the radio, clear and loud sound. As I move around a lot at work, I can't bother with a better antenna than a whip. Electronics in the lab and my computer can cause problems for the PAL. 3. Pull a weak signal near a strong one. I listen to many college, classical, NPR stations on the left side of the dial. Increasingly, our market is becoming more dense on the FM band. The PAL normally does a great job (see above). 4. AM / MW is not important; neither is SW. In the future I am looking to try to find a radio to tune in some international programs I miss from Europe, but FM is the only band I am interested in in this post. Thank you for all of your help, Jason |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
onealjn schrieb:
Hello All, I am looking for a portable FM receiver that well perform well. My ideal radio: 1. Portable. Does not have to be pocket-able, but that would be great. I've seen the Grundig g5 and that size would be fine. Smaller is better of course, but performance more important. I use a Tivoli PAL at the moment, and would like something is not smaller, in a better form factor for portability. What one should keep in mind is that smaller size almost invariably means that speaker sound quality will suffer in one way or another. IIRC the PAL is not renowned to be the very best sounding Tivoli model ever, but going to a pocketbook-sized portable with fairly little volume to speak of isn't likely to be an upgrade. 2. Able to pull a signal in a concrete building, basement, manage interference. I currently lug a Tivoli PAL around work. I love the PAL's sound. It pulls signals in our building better than any other radio (junk) I have access to here. But at times, it does have a hard time. In the basement and in the lab, it can have a lot of noise in the signal as well as a weak signal. If I touch the radio, clear and loud sound. As I move around a lot at work, I can't bother with a better antenna than a whip. Electronics in the lab and my computer can cause problems for the PAL. If RFI overlays the station you want to receive, about the only thing one can do is remove the set and its antenna from interference generators as far as possible. Basements usually are tricky places for radio reception in general, with low signal levels - a sensitive receiver would help here. A good capture ratio may help suppress RFI, but in portables this is even more rarely specified than measured. 3. Pull a weak signal near a strong one. I listen to many college, classical, NPR stations on the left side of the dial. Increasingly, our market is becoming more dense on the FM band. The PAL normally does a great job (see above). This will require good selectivity. For this out of the box, I would suggest either the classic Grundig YB400PE (the G4000A looks the same, hopefully it also performs just as well) or the Eton E5 / Grundig G5 (these two only differ in looks). Wait, I forgot the Kaito KA1103, which has the same receiving circuitry as the E5/G5, but less user-friendly operation at a lower price. Reconditioned YB400PEs would be another option for the penny pincher (Universal has some in stock), so getting away below the $100 mark is entirely possible. Regardless of which you choose, you're getting pretty much the best FM reception in this kind of set. Stephan -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ So if it receives like a handbag, does it sound good at least? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 10:22 am, onealjn wrote:
Hello All, I am looking for a portable FM receiver that well perform well. My ideal radio: 1. Portable. Does not have to be pocket-able, but that would be great. I've seen the Grundig g5 and that size would be fine. Smaller is better of course, but performance more important. I use a Tivoli PAL at the moment, and would like something is not smaller, in a better form factor for portability. 2. Able to pull a signal in a concrete building, basement, manage interference. I currently lug a Tivoli PAL around work. I love the PAL's sound. It pulls signals in our building better than any other radio (junk) I have access to here. But at times, it does have a hard time. In the basement and in the lab, it can have a lot of noise in the signal as well as a weak signal. If I touch the radio, clear and loud sound. As I move around a lot at work, I can't bother with a better antenna than a whip. Electronics in the lab and my computer can cause problems for the PAL. 3. Pull a weak signal near a strong one. I listen to many college, classical, NPR stations on the left side of the dial. Increasingly, our market is becoming more dense on the FM band. The PAL normally does a great job (see above). 4. AM / MW is not important; neither is SW. In the future I am looking to try to find a radio to tune in some international programs I miss from Europe, but FM is the only band I am interested in in this post. Thank you for all of your help, Jason Jason, Do you Listen to the Radio via the Radio's Speaker -or- use Headphones ? First - The FM Radio : Bigger than the Tivoli PAL are the Eton/Grundig 350DL Radios and the Redsun RP2100 Radio. Smaller is the Sony ICF-SW7600GR Radio. Second - The FM Antenna : For you more difficult Radio reception areas use a pair of TV Rabit Ears {basic FM Dipole Antenna} or a simple 300 Ohm TV Twin Lead "Folded Dipole" Antenna. TIPS - Try a short wire connected to the Whip Antenna of the Radio to : * Metal Window Frame * Metal Desk or File Cabinet * The Center Metal Cover Screw on an Electrical Outlet -Or- Wrap a few turns of Telephone Line around the Radio's Whip Antenna hope this helps - iane ~ RHF |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 7:41 pm, Stephan Grossklass
wrote: What one should keep in mind is that smaller size almost invariably means that speaker sound quality will suffer in one way or another. IIRC the PAL is not renowned to be the very best sounding Tivoli model ever, but going to a pocketbook-sized portable with fairly little volume to speak of isn't likely to be an upgrade. Quality and volume of audio are O.K. to sacrifice for reception. I usually listen to talk and classical at work at very low volumes. Regarding the Tivoli's PAL's sound, I am thrilled with its performance for its size. Everyone (non-audiophiles) who hears the little thing can't believe how it sounds. Is this testament to the quality of the PAL or more to the lack of quality of most portable receivers? I dunno. This will require good selectivity. For this out of the box, I would suggest either the classic Grundig YB400PE (the G4000A looks the same, hopefully it also performs just as well) or the Eton E5 / Grundig G5 (these two only differ in looks). Wait, I forgot the Kaito KA1103, which has the same receiving circuitry as the E5/G5, but less user-friendly operation at a lower price. Reconditioned YB400PEs would be another option for the penny pincher (Universal has some in stock), so getting away below the $100 mark is entirely possible. Regardless of which you choose, you're getting pretty much the best FM reception in this kind of set. Thanks for the suggestions. Googling these models, I came across a review in the _Monitoring Times_: http://www.monitoringtimes.com/html/2007_reviews.html The review compared all the models mentioned! Although the author was primarily interested in SW, he did note that FM on the G5 was superior to the other excellent models. Since I do want to try to receive some shortwave programs from Europe (possible?), I am looking forward to having an FM receiver that tunes SW as well. Thank you very much, Jason |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
Second - The FM Antenna : For you more difficult Radio reception areas use a pair of TV Rabit Ears {basic FM Dipole Antenna} or a simple 300 Ohm TV Twin Lead "Folded Dipole" Antenna. TIPS - Try a short wire connected to the Whip Antenna of the Radio to : * Metal Window Frame * Metal Desk or File Cabinet * The Center Metal Cover Screw on an Electrical Outlet -Or- Wrap a few turns of Telephone Line around the Radio's Whip Antenna Iane, Thank you for the tips on how to improve my reception. I appreciate the detailed info and hope it will add to my listening enjoyment not matter what radio I decide to buy. Jason |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 1:22 pm, onealjn wrote:
Hello All, I am looking for a portable FM receiver that well perform well. My ideal radio: 1. Portable. Does not have to be pocket-able, but that would be great. I've seen the Grundig g5 and that size would be fine. Smaller is better of course, but performance more important. I use a Tivoli PAL at the moment, and would like something is not smaller, in a better form factor for portability. Not sure how this radio compares to the Pal for size, but the Degen DE1103 delivers surprisingly good audio out the speaker and sound from decent headphones is also quite enjoyable. It is able to separate and deliver a lot of stations on FM and AM. I'm not sure what you are looking for in terms of "form factor" since most portables seem to be rectangularly shaped and around an inch thick. 2. Able to pull a signal in a concrete building, basement, manage interference. I currently lug a Tivoli PAL around work. I love the PAL's sound. It pulls signals in our building better than any other radio (junk) I have access to here. But at times, it does have a hard time. In the basement and in the lab, it can have a lot of noise in the signal as well as a weak signal. If you are entombed in a steel reinforced concrete basement while trying to listen to local FM stations almost any portable is going to have difficulty pulling out a usable signal, especially if there is a lot of electronic equipment in ther lab. The best way to improve reception is to move close to a window. I touch the radio, clear and loud sound. As I move around a lot at work, I can't bother with a better antenna than a whip. Electronics in the lab and my computer can cause problems for the PAL. 3. Pull a weak signal near a strong one. I listen to many college, classical, NPR stations on the left side of the dial. Increasingly, our market is becoming more dense on the FM band. The PAL normally does a great job (see above). 4. AM / MW is not important; neither is SW. In the future I am looking to try to find a radio to tune in some international programs I miss from Europe, but FM is the only band I am interested in in this post. Thank you for all of your help, Jason |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|