On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities. You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

Steve wrote:

On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities. You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

I think he's on full prance mode today.

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.


There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

On Oct 8, 2:20 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...

Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

Of course I'm not talking about time. None of your colleagues
(assuming you have any) would care to count the minutes you spend on
usenet, but they would be plenty surprised by the nature of your
posts. Even more interesting to them would be the more general project
of planting yourself in this group, doing your best to initiate
squabbles by spamming the group with one off-topic post after another,
and then engaging in your little, sissy "battles" about IBOC or
whatever is convenient. You actually alternate between sounding like a
12 year old on a playground and the old lady who lives down the street
from me, the one who spoils for any kind of "dispute" she can
generate---anything to bring someone into her life so that she's the
focus of their attention.


You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

'Nuff said.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.


There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?

On Oct 8, 2:37 pm, dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...

Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It hadn't occurred to me, but I'll bet his colleagues would be plenty
surprised by the lies he's told here. My guess is that he's more
careful in his life "offline", but people like this always forget how
easily the line between on and offline gets crossed. Sooner or later
this kind of crap will catch up with him. Like I said, though, I'll
bet that he can tolerate embarrassment much better than most people
because even embarrassment is a source of what he needs more than
anything: attention. Maybe this is a good thing...hard to say. Trying
to distinguish good from bad scenarios is pretty meaningless in this
context.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?


Proven only in your twisted mind.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?


Proven only in your twisted mind.

I don't think so, oh mentally ill one!

On Oct 8, 2:51 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?

Proven only in your twisted mind.



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Proven with more than enough plausibility to keep you coming back time
after time. Otherwise there's no way you'd have kept up the dialogue
this long.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?


Proven only in your twisted mind.


Nope. You have put on quite a display here.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California