Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 12:03 am, Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:59:46 -0800 (PST), Steve wrote: Begin On Nov 14, 10:02 pm, Joe Analssandrini wrote: I do not want to get into a discussion about the merits of the AR7030 'Plus' vs. the Icom 756Pro-III, especially as I have never seen one of the Icoms, but I would ask that people here cease repeating the old canards about operating the AR7030 'Plus' as they have long-since been discredited. First, even if one wishes to use the radio with its controls alone, it is just not that hard to do! If one can operate a VCR, a DVD player, one of the new HD televisions, or even a cell- phone, he/she will find operating the AR7030 a "piece of cake." We have ALL learned to use "menu-driven" products in the last ten years! When people complain that the menu system is 'complicated', I don't think they mean that it is complicated in the sense of 'difficult to understand'. Rather, they mean--or at any rate, I would mean--that it is complicated in the sense of requiring a larger number of movements or 'button pushes' and/or 'dial twists' per setting change. If you're DXing weak signals you will likely be continually adjusting some setting or other. It's not like a VCR or HD television, where you get it set up and then just let it go. Adding just a single modest step to the process of adjusting filter width or notch might not seem like a big deal, but you have to imagine it multiplied many thousands of times. But isn't knob twirling and button pushing an accepted part of the allure of SW DXing?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, it's accepted. It's accepted because it's inevitable, but I don't think anyone wants to there to be any more knob twiddling and button pushing than is necessary to get the job done. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
796 versus 780 | Scanner | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
ic-735 versus ic-726 | General |