About those birdies that I thought I spotted.........when I switched to the
external antenna input, the birdies disappeared. I checked a couple of my
other receivers on these "birdie" frequencies and observed these signals on
these receivers also.
I think that I have some cable TV leakage that is causing the problem. I am
sorry about the misinformation I gave, and I hope I didn't deter anybody
from buying this receiver.

Pete

"Omer S" wrote in message
...
In a time when computers and cell phones become completely obsolete after
three years, it is good to see a company, Eton, coming out with a
shortwave radio concept that everyone thought would never happen.

After twenty-five years, people are still raving about the Sony 2010, as a
benchmark comparison radio!

Meaning that a well designed shortwave radio is treated like a good Rolex
watch.

I don't have as much technical knowledge as Pete, but I gather that the E1
is the equivalent to what a new VW beetle is to an old model, air cooled
version, if you were to compare the E1 to the original Grundig 900 design.

One statement the designers of the E1 are saying, regarding a lack of a
ferrite core antenna, is, if you want to AM DX, than get the proper
antenna. The radio gives you this ability. Another thing, I didn't detect
any "birdies" like older radio designs (misdesigns) when going through
shortwave band.

It would be nice if reps from Eton and RL Drake join us on this discourse
regarding the E1. That way, new models of this radio can incorporate many
of the missing aspects that this radio should have.

The things I would like to see for example, that the radio has more of
the old Grundig beefed up bass, has RDS, and DRM ability in conjunction
with XM.

Omer


"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message
. ..
I think that most people have a pretty good handle on the performance of
this receiver, but I do understand what you mean.
There are a couple of advantages to LCDs..........by using a dot matrix
display such as the one used in this unit, the display capabilities can
be software driven. I am not very good with software, so I tend to either
go with LEDs or the smart LCDs, such as the ones driven by the HD44870
controllers. Even then, I let my software savvy friends write the code
for driving the displays, while I concentrate on the RF/Analog design.
LCDs do draw less current than LEDs, and with the fiber optic
backlighting panels from Lumitex you can have many choices of backlight
colors just by choosing the LED color. They can be found at:
http://www.lumitex.com/
I just installed one of them in my Palstar R-30 receiver last week. The
Drake SW-8 uses one of these panels for its backlight.
What this backlight consists of is a fiber optic bundle with a ferrule at
one end. The LED is inserted into this ferrule, and the fiber optic
bundle fans out into a flat panel. Most cool.
Even cooler would be if Eton would come up with a multi-color LCD on
their next iteration of this receiver. Now, if I could only get ahold of
a schematic diagram!

Pete

Your assessment of this fine receiver is one of only a handful that
sounds realistic and authentic to me, and not driven by the "Eton
cult" that I've never really been able to get my head around. Thanks
for this.

Why are LCDs attractive to the manufacturers of these receivers. I
know LCDs don't require a lot of power, which is a plus; but I would
gladly accept a more power hungry display so long as it wouldn't
compromise receiver performance! Are the LCDs cheaper? What's the
attraction from a manufacturer's point of view?

Steve

I appreciate the suggestion. It seems, though, that the contrast ratio isn't
too high on this display setup. I am beginning to think that a polarizing
filter mounted in front of the display might help. It appears that there is
diffusion occuring in the display substrate itself. This type of display may
not have been intended to be backlit in the first place, or the dot pitch of
the display itself is fairly coarse. I've got some old reflective graphics
displays that also have this appearance.

Pete

"k9kz" wrote in message
...

"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message
. ..
Thanks for the info..............I did indeed adjust the contrast. The
display reminds me of an image as viewed by a person who has cataracts (I
have had those).

Pete

You can get a special stand from Universal Radio that might well make
viewing more pleasant. I plan to order one.

Bill