On Apr 24, 7:20*pm, m II wrote:

Telamon -wrote-
- - Once a month?
- - I have to tell you every day that you {RHF} are an idiot
- - and the next day it is forgotten.

Mike (MII) -wrote-
- Why don't we try to be a bit more civil in the future?
- This garbage serves no purpose whatever.
-
- mike

Mike - It is hard to 'ignore' Telamon :
He sets himself up so well and
makes it ever so easy. ) ~ RHF

On Apr 24, 6:29*pm, "
wrote:
On Apr 14, 11:55*am, RHF wrote:





Improve the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup
-by- Make On-Topic Posts
-and- Being a Positive Contributor

Again I Repeat - One Positive Post that is about Shortwave Radio
does Four Times (4X) More Good in Keeping this Newsgroup
"Focused" On-Topic then Off-Topic (OT) Posts -or- Atacks on
'other' Members of the Newsgroup.

A Positive Shortwave Radio or Radio Related Post can
and does often generate a follow-up Reply by someone
else and that becomes the beginning of Real Content
for other Readers to R-E-A-D ! *{Good Content }

People come here to R-E-A-D and Post -but- It Most Often
Starts with Reading and then a Reply. *{Good Content}

On the Average One Good Original On-Topic Post will
generate Four or More Replies. {Good Content }

All Open Un-Moderated Newsgroups have their Off-Topic Posts
and SPAM [BAD CONTENT] -but- The Good Newsgroups also
have a Larger Share (Much More) of their {Good Content }

It is the S/N Ratio of {Good Content } over [BAD CONTENT]
that makes a Newsgroup Interesting-to-Read and -imho- a
Good Newsgroup.

Again Reap-What-You-Sow : The Challenge for Everyone

Once-a-Week Endeavor To :
* Post an Answer to One Newbies Question
* Post One Shortwave Radio Reception Report (SWR3)
* Post One : Me-Too / Atta-Boy / That Was Interesting
Reply to a Post that you though was deserving.
* Post Info about One Website that is Shortwave Radio
or Radio Related.
+ That Something Extra that is Uniquely You )

Imagine Yourself and 20 Other Members of this Newsgroup
Being Positive Contributers to this Newsgroup and Posting
Four (4) such Messages and Replies each Week : That
would add-up to 80 Messages about 11 per Day for each
Day of the Week. *The Quality Signal Level would Go Up
and even -if- the Noise Level stayed the same the Signal
to Noise Level would improve Greatly.

Everyone - It's Your Newsgroup -but- Only -if- You Contribute
in a Positive Way -by- Being-a-Contributor "Poster" and not
simply a Reader {Consumer}.

- - =PS= Newsgroup "Consumers" -aka- Readers : Take That
- - First-Step and Post a simple "Atta-Boy" or "Ditto That" reply.
- -
- - Knocking On "The-Other-Guy" simply makes you out to be
- - one more Whiner and simply adds to the Noise Level of the
- - Newsgroup.
- - -and- I Believe That Each of You Are Better Than That.
- -
- - Everyone - Be Better At Being Yourself - Love The Reason
- - For You Being Here as a Member of Rec.Radio/Shortwave :
- - More Than You Hate Anyone Else Here.
- -
- - Improve the rrs newsgroup -by- make on-topic posts
- - -and- positive contributions ~ RHF
- - *.

- Some very good suggestions here.
-*I think you could almost make this a mantra to live by
- if you just changed the subject newsgroups to life in general.
- *Thanks.


BAJ - Thank You for the "Positive" Reply. Hopefully
'being here' is a "positive" experience for everyone.

if not - why be here . . . ~ RHF

Telamon wrote:

Now if you have a better suggestion I would like you post it but if not
put a cork in it Mike.


Shocking! Absolutely SHOCKING!

Have you been making calls to Radio Stations?

http://www.photosled.com/data/504/wedstrijd.jpg






mike

On Apr 25, 8:05*am, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Now if you have a better suggestion I would like you post it but if not
put a cork in it Mike.
-
- Shocking! Absolutely SHOCKING!
-
- Have you been making calls to Radio Stations?
-
- http://www.photosled.com/data/504/wedstrijd.jpg
-
- mike

Mike - ROTFL - oaoa ~ RHF

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 10:20?pm, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Once a month? I have to tell you every day that you are an idiot and the
next day it is forgotten.

Why don't we try to be a bit more civil in the future? This garbage
serves no purpose whatever.

mike

Blame Eduardo and RHF.

Let's blame you, too. Your sexist and nasty remark about the woman on the
Venezuelan segment on Radio Habana is a nice example, right down to the "F"
bomb.

David Eduardo wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 10:20?pm, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Once a month? I have to tell you every day that you are an idiot and the
next day it is forgotten.

Why don't we try to be a bit more civil in the future? This garbage
serves no purpose whatever.

mike

Blame Eduardo and RHF.

Let's blame you, too. Your sexist and nasty remark about the woman on the
Venezuelan segment on Radio Habana is a nice example, right down to the "F"
bomb.

I just love it when the faux one gets his panties in a knot!

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Apr 25, 8:05*am, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Now if you have a better suggestion I would like you post it but if not
put a cork in it Mike.
-
- Shocking! Absolutely SHOCKING!
-
- Have you been making calls to Radio Stations?
-
- http://www.photosled.com/data/504/wedstrijd.jpg
-

Hey there retard. You did a great job improving RRS by generating a
number of posts to three different political threads not to mention
other off topic BS threads.

Good job news group retard.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
dave wrote:

RHF wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:20 pm, m II wrote:

Telamon -wrote-
- - Once a month?
- - I have to tell you every day that you {RHF} are an idiot
- - and the next day it is forgotten.

Mike (MII) -wrote-
- Why don't we try to be a bit more civil in the future?
- This garbage serves no purpose whatever.
-
- mike

Mike - It is hard to 'ignore' Telamon :
He sets himself up so well and
makes it ever so easy. ) ~ RHF
.
For Example His series of Posts in this Thread is a
'perfect example' of what a Positivie Contributor AIN'T !
.
Teli - You are a wonderful Teaching Tool {Trill}
and a fine 'un-example' to others.
.
test

Yeah test, sure thing.

I have read the posts you made today and you failed the test. I would
not use the news group retard RHF as an example.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:03:03 -0700, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Dave wrote:

John Kasupski wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:57:35 -0700, Dave wrote:

Doing business with Verizon is bad karma. They help the fascistas spy
on you and they hate DSL. And you want to take over the newsgroup?

I do not wish to "take over" anything. I thought I had made that
clear. I simply wish to facilitate the process of replacing the old
FAQs so that the group has a decent set of orientative documents once
again, as it did in the past.

JK

Orientative?

Well, orientational? Whatever..... shrug

What's wrong with the 1996 (?) statement?

It is in direct contradiction with the 1984 statement.

I don't believe r.r.s was newgrouped until 1993. But anyway......

The main issue I have with the old documents is that they haven't been
updated/posted regularly here since like 1998, and they're copyrighted
by Ralph Brandi - or by Scott Fybush, in the case of the AM/TV DX'ing
FAQ - guys who aren't around anymore.

Maybe we could repost the original documents here and get away with
it, but there have been a lot of new technologies and stuff that have
come out in the last ten years. There were never any documents on
satellite radio, for example (which incidentally is one document
somebody else is going to have to help out with because that's not at
all my cup of tea nor my area of expertise).

JK

In article ,
John Kasupski wrote:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:03:03 -0700, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Dave wrote:

John Kasupski wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:57:35 -0700, Dave wrote:

Doing business with Verizon is bad karma. They help the fascistas spy
on you and they hate DSL. And you want to take over the newsgroup?

I do not wish to "take over" anything. I thought I had made that
clear. I simply wish to facilitate the process of replacing the old
FAQs so that the group has a decent set of orientative documents once
again, as it did in the past.

JK

Orientative?

Well, orientational? Whatever..... shrug

I did not write that. The "biteme" person wrote that.

What's wrong with the 1996 (?) statement?

It is in direct contradiction with the 1984 statement.

I don't believe r.r.s was newgrouped until 1993. But anyway......

SNIP

It's a joke. Mr. "biteme" may get it depending on the pipe mixture du
jour.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California