RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Big 89 Rewind (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/133607-big-89-rewind.html)

dxAce June 1st 08 08:22 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


So it was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...



No, it was because the 120 station strong Puerto Rico Broadcasters
Association felt the stations were illegal. And they were.


Illegal my ass...

It was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...


AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo
and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey
could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and
Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when
the PRBA presented its case.


You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...



D Peter Maus June 1st 08 08:25 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.

The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.





Once again, you demonstrate my point for me.

If the point is to show how many ugly things the US has done abroad, then
that's right.


Again, the only thing you renounce.....

David Eduardo[_4_] June 1st 08 08:27 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when
the PRBA presented its case.


You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...


You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all
the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing
them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would
imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go
to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend.



D Peter Maus June 1st 08 08:37 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when
the PRBA presented its case.

You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...


You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all
the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing
them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would
imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go
to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend.




Ah...this from an accessory-after-the-fact to illegal activity.

I'm sure Steve's properly humiliated.



Brenda Ann June 1st 08 09:26 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo
and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey
could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and
Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.



That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....



David Eduardo[_4_] June 1st 08 09:45 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and
Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS
Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and
Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest.

That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when the PRBA presented its case.



That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond
their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait....


An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not
need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would
have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly
2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the
base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the
restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them
on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several
hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there
had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be
heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds.



RHF June 1st 08 09:53 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 
On Jun 1, 6:58*am, Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:


"dxAce" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
* *Apparently, they finally succeeded in achieving that goal.
I'll have to check the shortwave relays next week to see if Rush is
still
on. I
recall the push to at least get him off, seemingly in contrast to what
the
troops
wanted.


How many of the troops are over 45 or 50? There are very few talk
listeners
(of the WLS / WJR / WGN type) under that age, so it makes sense to look
for
programming the bulk of the armed forces would enjoy, not just somebody
who
has been in long enough to make light bird or above.
Or maybe the troops just like Rush?


* Isn't it amazing that never occurs to programmers?


When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?


Nice spin. People that call in to the program don't sound over 50. They
sound like they are 20 to 40 years old. Mom's with kids and many topics
revolve around kids, school.


- How many calls does El Oxycontin-bo
- take in the course of 3 hours?

Dave,

For the most part People "Tune-in" and Listen to hear
Rush Limbaugh 'do' Rush Limbaugh*.
* Rush Limbaugh's Show Ain't About Call-Ins :
It's About Rush Limbaugh Bloviating to the Extreme.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh

Whereas People "Tune-in" to Listen to Sean Hannity to
hear Sean Hannity* and His Guests plus some Callers.
* Sean Hannity's Show is more than Sean Hannity -but-
Sean Hannity still Bloviates most of the air time away.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Hannity

at least that is the way i hear it on the radio ~ RHF

m II June 1st 08 10:31 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 
Dave wrote:

I have to climb ladders and rigging sometimes. If I couldn't do that
I'd be severely limited in my ability to rake in the bongos.


Rake in the bongos? Is that like cashing in the castanets? Depositing
the dxAces? No, wait, that last one is a bowel movement.


mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

RHF June 1st 08 10:34 PM

AFN Sending a Message to the US Troops : Conservative Talk Radio-versus- NPR
 
On Jun 1, 6:44*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:


"dxAce" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
* *Apparently, they finally succeeded in achieving that goal.
I'll have to check the shortwave relays next week to see if Rush is
still
on. I
recall the push to at least get him off, seemingly in contrast to what
the
troops
wanted.


How many of the troops are over 45 or 50? There are very few talk
listeners
(of the WLS / WJR / WGN type) under that age, so it makes sense to look
for
programming the bulk of the armed forces would enjoy, not just somebody
who
has been in long enough to make light bird or above.
Or maybe the troops just like Rush?


* Isn't it amazing that never occurs to programmers?


When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?


Maybe they want the truth from home.


* *He doesn't get it, Steve.

* *Consider that there are a number of things that are not like things
at home. One is that the listener him/herself is different. They're
committed. They're focussed. They're trained. They've volunteered to
serve. They're politically active at the most basic level. They're less
concerned about the fluff that dominates the evening news than they are
defending the fundamental freedoms that permit the behaviours that lead
to the fluff that dominates the evening news.

* *That takes them off most squares of the psychographic grid. Hometown
demography doesn't apply. They're a different type of people with
listening tastes and habits that reflect a different type of lifestyle.

* *Another consideration is that there are dramatically fewer choices
for listening in theatre. Unlike you and me, who have a dial full of
selections, troops in theatre have a fraction of the offerings. They
listen, as you say, for fresh truths from home. Not for the latest
George Michael release.

* *And politically, they tend to a more conservative path. Rush is big
with military, as a whole, regardless of demography.

* *Programming AFN is not like programming WKSC.

* *Drop Gleason into a Marine base in-country and he'd get a dose of
reality he assiduously avoids in his current position.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


AFN Sending a Message to the US Troops :

Conservative Talk Radio re-affirms to the US Troops
# 1 - Support From Home
# 2 - Why They Are Fighting

NPR -informs- the US Troops
# 1 - Some Americans Hate Them
# 2 - Many Politicians Do Not Support Them.
# 3 - They Have No Reason To Be Fighting
# 4 - They Are 'potentially' War Criminals

at least that is the way i hear it on the radio ~ RHF

dxAce June 1st 08 11:21 PM

Big 89 Rewind
 


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when
the PRBA presented its case.


You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...


You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all
the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing
them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would
imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go
to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend.


I would imagine that tomorrow you'll be back here yet again prancing as the fake
Hispanic you are!




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com