|
Big 89 Rewind
David Eduardo wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait.... An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly 2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds. Guess you'd better try and find some other place to go, and renounce your citizenship, boy. Extremely heavy emphasis on the BOY. |
Big 89 Rewind
David Eduardo wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait.... An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly 2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds. A lot of folks lived off base? But, at any rate, as usual, you are way off base, 'Eduardo'. Give it up, and leave the country, yet again. |
Big 89 Rewind
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... So it was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... No, it was because the 120 station strong Puerto Rico Broadcasters Association felt the stations were illegal. And they were. Illegal my ass... It was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. It's a government radio station, providing info to gov't personnel. Stop whining, you pathetic little prick. |
Big 89 Rewind
dxAce wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... So it was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... No, it was because the 120 station strong Puerto Rico Broadcasters Association felt the stations were illegal. And they were. Illegal my ass... It was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. It's a government radio station, providing info to gov't personnel. Stop whining, you pathetic little prick. All the more reason to support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement. |
Big 89 Rewind
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend. You'll be in Mexico in a week or so stocking up not only on the cheap stuff, but you'll be getting some of the other 'cheap stuff', won't you boy? |
Big 89 Rewind
On Jun 1, 3:24*pm, dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait.... An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly 2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds. Guess you'd better try and find some other place to go, and renounce your citizenship, boy. - Extremely heavy emphasis on the BOY. Extremely heavy Audio Processing emphasis on the BOY. http://www.solidynepro.com/documentos/JAES-07-ENG.pdf # 27 - Breaking the Language Barrier - Gringos in Spanish Radio http://www.nabstore.com/2007-radio-s...ecord2007.html |
Big 89 Rewind
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait.... An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly 2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds. A lot of folks lived off base? No, nearly none lived off base. |
Big 89 Rewind
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... So it was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... No, it was because the 120 station strong Puerto Rico Broadcasters Association felt the stations were illegal. And they were. Illegal my ass... It was really because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. It's a government radio station, providing info to gov't personnel. No, it is a Military station intended to serve, and only serve, military personnel on base. In fact, in US territories where the FCC licenses stations, they are not supposed to get any signal off the base. |
Big 89 Rewind
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... AFRTS Buchannan could be easily heard in Hato Rey, Old San Juan and Cataņo and the northern reaches of Guaynabo, very illegal coverage. AFRTS Ramey could be heard on the coast as far as Isabela to the East and Aguada and Moca to the West and Southwest. That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. That's a lie. Everyone knows that a radio station can't be heard beyond their COL. Eduardo says so... oh, wait.... An AFRTS on an ADMINISTRATIVE base that is less than a square mile does not need to put 10 mv/m over an area 10 mi8les away. A carrier current AM would have worked; the other AM at Ramey has such a good signal it was DXed nearly 2000 miles away and could be piced up easily for more than 20 miles from the base on land. Neither obeyed either the spirit or the intent of the restrictions on AFRTS stations... starting with the fact that putting them on US soil and then allowing them to compete over areas as big as several hundred square miles of off-base US territory was not appropriate. If there had been an AFRTS station at one of the San Antonio bases that could be heard in downtown SA it would have been closed in about 90 seconds. A lot of folks lived off base? No, nearly none lived off base. No matter, you're off base, you whiny little SOB. Heavy emphasis on the SOB, boy. |
Big 89 Rewind
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM when the PRBA presented its case. You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned them... You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend. You'll be in Mexico in a week or so stocking up not only on the cheap stuff, but you'll be getting some of the other 'cheap stuff', won't you boy? No, actually I will be in NY. Stop by the Parker Meridien for a visit, why don'cha? I have not been to Mexico since 2004 when I conducted a seminar for Arbitron. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com