Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently known
as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on Zenithm, in
February, I needed some information about their flagship station. The
engineer pulled all the information straight out of his files.
I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.

You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with the
maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the opinion
that there are none that go back beyond a few years.


I said that the remaining ones are few and far between. I have never seen a
single case, and I have direct, on site experience with well over 100
stations in the US.




I'm sorry, David, but in an industry that thrives on documentation,
with as much government involvement, I simply don't beleive that all of
the stations I've been involved with, with all the documentation that's
been on hand, have been anomalous.

You, on the other hand, have no interest in documentation that goes
more than a few years deep. And, it's pretty obvious why you'd have a
vested interest in having such a short tail. I can see why you'd believe
that everyone else would, too.

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently known
as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on Zenithm, in
February, I needed some information about their flagship station. The
engineer pulled all the information straight out of his files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with the
maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the opinion
that there are none that go back beyond a few years.


I said that the remaining ones are few and far between. I have never seen a
single case, and I have direct, on site experience with well over 100
stations in the US.

And you own not a single one. Just like Ecuador, it's deja vu all over again.

d'Eduardo : So in your Radio Marketing World Writing-Off Half (1/2) the US Population is Good Business.
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the ages radio advertisers seek are 18 to 54. Nearly never do you see
teen buys nor do you see 55+ buys. Everything is in the 18-54 group.

That's great news Eduardo. That means we are all going to be rich since
none of us will be spending any money once we are over 54 years. No more
worries about retirement.


Major advertisers from Budweiser to P&G and Lever have proven in their
in-house research that there is no ROI on advertising to 55+ with mass
market products. It takes too many impressions to create a change in habits,
and the cost of those impressions exceeds the profit on the sale.

Big 89 Rewind
 

RHF wrote:
On Jun 1, 10:31 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
Or maybe the troops just like Rush?
Isn't it amazing that never occurs to programmers?
When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?
Maybe they want the truth from home.
- From Limbaugh? That's an entertainment program,
not a news show.

d'Eduardo,

Rush Limbaugh presents 'The News with a Right
Thinking View Point" and Yes he is Entertaining.

~ RHF
.
OK, maybe you can give an example of real news on Limbaugh's show. All
I hear is whining.

Big 89 Rewind
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on
Zenithm, in February, I needed some information about their flagship
station. The engineer pulled all the information straight out of his
files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

WEFM was a special case. We had just finished going to the Supreme
Court and we were well aware that it was the pioneer FM stereo station.
Every place I've worked lately has a "compliance consultant" that
tells us what to save and what to discard; helps filing quarterlies;
maintains the Public File; etc.

Big 89 Rewind
 

clifto wrote:
Dave wrote:
I'd rather fight the enemy here, rather than over there.

You'd get more people to join you in surrender that way.


Bull****. We'd have the locals on our side and we'd have much shorter
supply lines.

Big 89 Rewind
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on
Zenithm, in February, I needed some information about their flagship
station. The engineer pulled all the information straight out of his
files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in
1978. 120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

WEFM was a special case. We had just finished going to the Supreme
Court and we were well aware that it was the pioneer FM stereo station.
Every place I've worked lately has a "compliance consultant" that tells
us what to save and what to discard; helps filing quarterlies; maintains
the Public File; etc.


Then, WDZ was a special case, I guess. And KWKH. And KFI. And KLZS.
And WEW. And...how many more do you need? Every place I've ever worked
has had documentation that went back decades. If not back to the beginning.

Big 89 Rewind
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on
Zenithm, in February, I needed some information about their
flagship station. The engineer pulled all the information straight
out of his files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in
1978. 120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

WEFM was a special case. We had just finished going to the Supreme
Court and we were well aware that it was the pioneer FM stereo
station. Every place I've worked lately has a "compliance consultant"
that tells us what to save and what to discard; helps filing
quarterlies; maintains the Public File; etc.


Then, WDZ was a special case, I guess. And KWKH. And KFI. And KLZS.
And WEW. And...how many more do you need? Every place I've ever worked
has had documentation that went back decades. If not back to the beginning.




****...correct that...not KFI, but KFH. (Too many nights covering
repairs, here. Sorry about that.) Hell we still has the WE transmitter
and tower in operation.

Big 89 Rewind
 

Dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
Dave wrote:
I'd rather fight the enemy here, rather than over there.

You'd get more people to join you in surrender that way.


Bull****. We'd have the locals on our side and we'd have much shorter
supply lines.

Face it, you'd love the fact that the terror over here would encourage
the weak to go over to your surrender side and vote to mollycoddle the
terrorists.

--
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

(OT) : The War on Islam-O-Facism is a 100~200 Year War for WesternCivilization to Endure, or be Subjugated by Islam {Convert-or-Die}.
 

On Jun 3, 10:40*am, clifto wrote:

Dave -wrote-
- - - - I'd rather fight the enemy here, rather than over there.

Clifto -wrote-
- - - You'd get more people to join you in surrender that way.

Dave -wrote-
- - Bull****. *
- - We'd have the locals on our side
- - and we'd have much shorter supply lines.

Clifto -wrote-
- Face it, you'd love the fact that the terror over here
- would encourage the weak to go over to your
- surrender side and vote to mollycoddle the terrorists.

"IF" - Big 'If' there is another major Terrorist Attack on
the USA by Islam-O-Facist : IMHO the vast majority of
US Citizens will not settle for less than Total War on
the sponsoring Governments.

Here-Is-Something-To-Think-About :
The War on Islam-O-Facism is a 100~200 Year War
for Western Civilization to Endure, or be Subjugated
by Islam {Convert-or-Die}.
[ Fight into the 22nd Century : Or Submit to the 7th Century ]

The Neutron Bomb is the Answer to Dealing with
Nations who's Governments sponsor Terrorism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

After the First Counter Strike :
They Will Have A Very Level Praying Field.
Plus the Infrastructure will still be in-place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructure
Open-Up the newly Vacated Lands to Migration from
Non-Islamic Peoples and World Wide Investment.
China and India could both re-locate 3~5 Million of
their people a Year for the next 100 Years to help
Re-Poplulate formerly Islamic Nations. The rest of
the non-islamic world could do the same.

yes - i said that ~ RHF