RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Big 89 Rewind (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/133607-big-89-rewind.html)

David Eduardo[_4_] June 2nd 08 03:04 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

OK, here is one for you: How many people have the close of escrow papers
for homes they have not owned for 40 years? For most people, the house is
the biggest investment they would ever make, yet probably 99.9% of people
do not keep that kind of paperwork.


I do. I have all the records from every car I've ever owned.


That indicates why you think others would have similar papers. Most people,
the vast majority of them, don't.

Once a year has passed when I dispose of a car, I dispose of the papers.
That's beyond my limit of any liability, so good riddance. And I must have
had 35 to 40 cars over the years, too Houses, maybe two to three years. And
I've had about 12 or 13 of those. And so on.

I even have my grandfather's from the house in River Forest.


You are, perchance, related to a family of pack rats?



D Peter Maus June 2nd 08 04:31 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Time for some MAJOR damage control to cover that one.
Heck, he'll just come back with MAJOR lies. Nothing new.

Nobody today keeps documents beyond legal retention requirements. With
the cost of record retention (space, logistics, etc.) nobody wants a
museum in their radio station.

Not entirely true, David.


True enough for the exceptions to be unusual.




If they are exceptions unusual.

That hasn't been determined.


D Peter Maus June 2nd 08 04:33 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
OK, here is one for you: How many people have the close of escrow papers
for homes they have not owned for 40 years? For most people, the house is
the biggest investment they would ever make, yet probably 99.9% of people
do not keep that kind of paperwork.

I do. I have all the records from every car I've ever owned.


That indicates why you think others would have similar papers. Most people,
the vast majority of them, don't.


M
Once a year has passed when I dispose of a car, I dispose of the papers.
That's beyond my limit of any liability, so good riddance. And I must have
had 35 to 40 cars over the years, too Houses, maybe two to three years. And
I've had about 12 or 13 of those. And so on.
I even have my grandfather's from the house in River Forest.


You are, perchance, related to a family of pack rats?



Clever. You are, perchance, related to a family of traitors?






Telamon June 2nd 08 04:33 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?


Nice spin. People that call in to the program don't sound over 50. They
sound like they are 20 to 40 years old. Mom's with kids and many topics
revolve around kids, school.


The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired women and
senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest demos. They know
that 9 out of 10 over 55 callers will want to talk about social security and
Medicare, and they diligently keep these callers off the air. You don't
really think these shows let anyone at all on the air, do you?


Since they can fill the shows with 20 to 40 years old middle aged people
then they must be the a big proportion of the listeners. Most of the
commercials are aimed at the middle class, middle age group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

RHF June 2nd 08 04:36 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
On Jun 1, 4:28*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:


"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally
in
a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed
a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS
stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS
board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting
the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at
the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not
put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of
the
AFRTS operational dictates.


As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been full of
****
for
quite a number of years, not only here, but in numerous radio clubs
throughout
our great land.


The fact is that the PRBA got the AFRTS stations closed down for
operating
outside the parameters of such a station.


- - Well, maybe it's time to cut PR loose, let them go on their own.

- You can't revoke the citizenship of 8 million Americans.

d'Eduardo,

The US Congress 'granted' US Citizenship to the Residents
of Puerto Rico and the US Congress 'could' take it away.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/rq.html
http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/c.../caribb/pr.htm

But - More importantly the peoples of the "Commonwealth"
of Puerto Rico can by simply Voting to be an Independent
Nation -and- Say Bye-Bye to US Citizenship [.]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico

You know there is a 'thing' called "Puerto Rican Citizenship"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Puerto_Rico

~ RHF
-ps- 200 Mile Fishing and Oil Exploration Zones.
http://www.npr.org/healthscience/ima...ocean.map2.gif

Telamon June 2nd 08 04:36 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
.
..
When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?
Nice spin. People that call in to the program don't sound over 50. They
sound like they are 20 to 40 years old. Mom's with kids and many topics
revolve around kids, school.

The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired women and
senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest demos. They
know that 9 out of 10 over 55 callers will want to talk about social
security and Medicare, and they diligently keep these callers off the
air. You don't really think these shows let anyone at all on the air, do
you?



"Nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush,"

And then: "The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired
women and senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest
demos."


You're contradicting yourself, again. If they're not listening, they
can't be calling.


"Youngest demos" for talk is generally 35-44.


I hear people in their twenties all the time. Many are servicemen or the
wives of serviceman.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon June 2nd 08 04:51 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.






Once again, you demonstrate my point for me.

If the point is to show how many ugly things the US has done abroad, then
that's right.


That's pretty offensive Eduardo. Why don't you just head back to South
America. We don't need your kind in the USA.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon June 2nd 08 04:54 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when
the PRBA presented its case.


You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...


You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all
the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing
them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would
imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go
to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend.


Again that's pretty offensive. Time to head back to South America or
anywhere except the USA. How about Canada? Mike has a spare room.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon June 2nd 08 05:00 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating
illegally in a US territory don't you get? The local
broadcasters association formed a committee to investigate the
operational restrictions on AFRTS stations inside the US and
its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS board as
well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed,
getting the two offending stations closed. An in-compliance
limited signal FM at the now-closed submarine base at Naguabo
continued operation as it did not put a significant signal off
base and was judged to be within the spirit of the AFRTS
operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been
full of **** for quite a number of years, not only here, but in
numerous radio clubs throughout our great land.


The fact is that the PRBA got the AFRTS stations closed down for
operating outside the parameters of such a station.


Well, maybe it's time to cut PR loose, let them go on their own.


You can't revoke the citizenship of 8 million Americans.


Sure you can. I think you would make a good test case.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon June 2nd 08 05:04 AM

Big 89 Rewind
 
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


ABC could likely not produce the papers proving it owned WABC in 1964.
No
document retention rules or laws or guidances even suggest document
retention beyond a decade or so. This is more than 40 years!

And yet, you yourself, have documents on your very own website older than
40
years.

Nice try, oh faux one. But, it ain't playing in Peoria.

Come on boy, where's your quick response?


Like I said, even the FCC does not retain records beyond, in most cases, the
late 70's. If there are any US stations continuously owned since the 60's, I
doubt most could prove the original license grant or transfer.


Evasive yet again. Nice try, oh faux one. Like I said before, It ain't playing
in Peoria.


It does not play in Ventura, California either.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com