Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Pete KE9OA wrote: First of all, get ahold of the owner's manual............this is available as a free download at a few sites. Google will find them for you. You mentioned that the display works.........does the display stay locked on the frequency that you are tuned to, or does it run in a free-run mode. If the display doesn't give a stable reading, odds are that the electrolytic caps in the 24V power supply that supplies the VCO tune voltage are bad. If the display works, tune the receiver to 8888.8kHz; this way, you can see if any of the display segments are burned out (a common problem, since Drake ran these devices at too high of a current). Next, do some internet research and find out what frequencies are in use at the time of year. As a quick and dirty test, tune the radio to the MW band and see if you can clearly hear any stations. I could go on and on and on........................but, if you really want to check it out, send it to John Kriner, over at R.L. Drake and have hime check it out. I don't have the time to do this kind of stuff anymore..........too many projects of my own. I think his rate is about 100 dollars per hour. If the receiver has all of the optional I.F. filters and it works properly on all ranges, it is worth about 1200 dollars, plus or minus market demand. Basically, it is the same receiver as the later versions of the R7 receiver, with the exception that it adds a CW filter, a noise blanker, and a resistor across one of the unused filter slots so the the bandwidth is determined by the roofing filter. Electrically, they are the same. Now, the older R7 receivers used eight 1N4148 diodes in a ring for the 2nd mixer, while later R7s (including this one) used four 1N4148s, with a resistor in series with each of the diodes. This configuration gives slightly better IMD response, but the NF is slightly degraded. Better to dump those 1N4148s and replace them with 1N5711 hot carrier diodes. Not a bad receiver, as long as you know how to repair them. Now, if you have a good RF signal generator with an accurate calibrated output attenuator, you will be able to measure the sensitivity. If the receiver is working properly, you should be able to easily hear a -127dBm signal across the whole tuning range. I have had mine for a couple of years, and after upgrading the 1st and 2nd mixers, mine is a keeper! Always a keeper if properly maintained. The R8 series is great, but for the truly tough dx, the R7 is always in the stable here. I'm currently making a 'target list' for stuff I want to do this upcoming dx season ( hey, it's summer, and I've got to cut the grass, and fool with bankers) when the static subsides and the frost sets in. dxAce Michigan USA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... Always a keeper if properly maintained. The R8 series is great, but for the truly tough dx, the R7 is always in the stable here. I'm currently making a 'target list' for stuff I want to do this upcoming dx season ( hey, it's summer, and I've got to cut the grass, and fool with bankers) when the static subsides and the frost sets in. dxAce Michigan USA The R7 is probably my favorite solid state receiver. Something about that old time blue-green lighting. Just like the old magic eye tubes. I replaced the burned out displays with the upgraded ones from Germany, and increased the value of the current limiting resistors from 36 Ohms to 560 Ohms. This thing should be running for a long time. It looks good next to the TR7. Pete |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another day at the salt mine | General | |||
Another day at the salt mine | Policy | |||
One more opinion of mine | Policy | |||
The PRN-1000 an auction, but not mine. | Shortwave | |||
Strobotachometer ?? (here's mine) | Boatanchors |