Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
First, if you won't mind leaving your Fantasy Land for a moment.do you
really believe the force-feeding of digital TV has anything to do with enhancement of the television viewing experience? ! Good grief! You obviously are not paying attention. When we are all straightjacketed into digital TV the handcuffs will go on. Suddenly you will discover you cannot record TV shows or certain games off of broadcast TV because they've done the same thing to the video that they've done to copy guard DVDs. Then will come the encoding of certain games and programs. Only paying subscribers will be able to see them after phoning in their credit card number, thanks to the new digital TV system. Once done, a data burst will be broadcast on one of the digital sub carrier channels that will "unlock" the chip on a digital TV that is similar to the "IP" identifier on your computer (if you're running anything newer than a Pentium 3 processor). If you haven't paid up, your "IP" number will not appear in the string of others who have and, VOILA.you're S.O.L. Carry it one step further, sheeple. Like so many things today that are only "illusionary tests." "We'll see if this will fly before we try that." If they can sell making us all run out and buy pricey new TVs and converter boxes or subscribe to overpriced cable or satellite service (which will serve a double purpose of adding to the huge database dossier on ever citizen about television viewing habits and interests).ESPECIALLY IN THE ****TY ECONOMY THEY HAVE GIVEN US. it will be like shooting fish in a barrel to force us into buying new fuel-economy vehicles under threat of a tax on how fast your odometer rotates. So, yeah. Go ahead, embrace digital TV. Too bad the "big picture" you see on your new HDTV big screen is the furthest thing from the real "big picture" here. Did you REALLY think this was all about enhancement of the viewing experience? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 30, 5:56 pm, "Smokey" wrote:
Did you REALLY think this was all about enhancement of the viewing experience? For me it is. Several new channels (sub-channels) of programming already on the air. In fact, I watch the sub-channels more than the regular ones. No need to pay for satellite or cable. We are told that next year we could have over 80 channels (including subchannels) of programming to select from here in Central California. I'm getting networks I never heard of before with great programming. AND, I don't have a big screen HDTV. I watch a 20-inch analog tv and am getting the best reception ever. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jul 30, 5:56 pm, "Smokey" wrote: Did you REALLY think this was all about enhancement of the viewing experience? For me it is. Several new channels (sub-channels) of programming already on the air. In fact, I watch the sub-channels more than the regular ones. No need to pay for satellite or cable. We are told that next year we could have over 80 channels (including subchannels) of programming to select from here in Central California. I'm getting networks I never heard of before with great programming. AND, I don't have a big screen HDTV. I watch a 20-inch analog tv and am getting the best reception ever. You're fortunate. Many areas outside of a city don't get DTV at all. Also, if you have a lot of subchannels, you're not getting HDTV, as it is an either/or situation. Subchannels mean that the bandwidth is not available for HD (anything over 720p) signals. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 31, 1:16 am, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
You're fortunate. Many areas outside of a city don't get DTV at all. Also, if you have a lot of subchannels, you're not getting HDTV, as it is an either/or situation. Subchannels mean that the bandwidth is not available for HD (anything over 720p) signals. Like I said, I use an analog tv, so even the hdtv channels are not hd for me. But I can definitely tell a difference between the analog channels and the digital channels. The digital signal, even converted to analog, are a higher resolution than the analog channels. For those outside of a city where reception is a problem -- they will contine to get their LP translator stations for a few more years. Most of the major stations here have translator transmitters that relay their signal to the outlining areas. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For some people who don't subscribe to satellite tv (I subscribe to
DirecTV, To much money for the amount of bread) or cable tv, there will be no tv at all for them.I think some of those people will be highly pizzed off too.It will not be an easy transition from Analog tv to HD tv.I predict there will be, Katrinas all over America, there will be Hell to pay! fed govt F..ks up again! Wearethegovtandweareheretohelpyou. cuhulin |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 31, 4:15 pm, wrote:
For some people who don't subscribe to satellite tv (I subscribe to DirecTV, To much money for the amount of bread) or cable tv, there will be no tv at all for them.I think some of those people will be highly pizzed off too.It will not be an easy transition from Analog tv to HD tv.I predict there will be, Katrinas all over America, there will be Hell to pay! fed govt F..ks up again! Wearethegovtandweareheretohelpyou. cuhulin It's not going to be any surprise for anyone who watches over-the-air TV. Every channel here advertises the change all day and all night long. It is constantly going across the screen on a banner, they keep announcing it -- there is just no way these people don't know what is coming. I know people in their 80's and 90's who already have a digital tuner or converter box. Central California has the largest over-the-air population of anywhere in the US, and everyone I talk to is well aware of what is coming. Yes, it might require an outdoor antenna for some who now use an indoor antenna. We have 13 full-power stations here and 13 low-power stations. All 13 low-power stations will remain on the air for a few more years. I don't think it's going to be a big problem at all. You would have to live in a vacuum to not know what is coming. And there are people helping the elderly install their converter boxes. And more low power stations keep popping up. They will provide the service to those who don't want to make the conversion at this time. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jul 31, 4:15 pm, wrote: It's not going to be any surprise for anyone who watches over-the-air TV. Every channel here advertises the change all day and all night long. It is constantly going across the screen on a banner, they keep announcing it -- there is just no way these people don't know what is coming. I know people in their 80's and 90's who already have a digital tuner or converter box. Central California has the largest over-the-air population of anywhere in the US, and everyone I talk to is well aware of what is coming. Yes, it might require an outdoor antenna for some who now use an indoor antenna. For many, an outdoor antenna is not an option. Just try getting permission in a covenant community or an apartment complex to put up an antenna.. It will be interesting, for sure, to see what does happen next February. I suspect there will be a lot more than one might think that will be caught without. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Story of Two Homes | Shortwave | |||
Chucky's new homes | CB | |||
Florida to allow use of force even outside homes. | Shortwave | |||
Five million homes have Freeview | Broadcasting |