Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Future of DRM on SW?
On Jul 31, 9:58�am, Rfburns wrote:
On Jul 30, 5:13 pm, KaitoWRX911 wrote: "Why don't you use DRM on Shortwave?" DRM is the acronym of Digital Radio Mondiale, a new technology intended to offer digital, almost FM, quality to Shortwave, Long Wave and Medium Wave (AM) broadcasts. Unfortunately DRM is incompatible with ordinary Shortwave radios and requires buying new receivers, that are not currently available in mass production, or at a cost that is anywhere close to a conventional, analogue Shortwave receiver. Some DRM receivers requires a PC and a special device to listen to DRM signals. Our transmitters are DRM capable, and we already run preliminary tests with our own developed DRM encoders. We are ready to broadcast using DRM at any time, but unfortunately there are no mass produced receivers for our listeners to buy at a decent price, and - most importantly - there are no listeners for DRM at present. DRM is a very promising technology, has a 2-3 year delay over original plans, and it is still confined as a technological experiment. Will it be successful, meaning that we will see soon lots of listeners embracing it? Ask the man in the street: unfortunately marketing efforts to create awareness of this new potential media have not been started yet. Some large companies are pushing DRM by convincing program producers and broadcasters to start airing in DRM ahead of time, but unless there is mass availability and penetration of receivers on the listeners side, this will remain - unfortunately - a technological experiment, and broadcasters using it to reach their listeners now, are clearly throwing their money out of the window. Similar "experiments" were run in the past using analogue & digital satellite radio and WorldSpace. They failed miserably in reaching an audience for different reasons. We have been following with great interest the development of DRM, and as soon as one of our members send us a request to start DRM broadcasts we will do it. Currently we advise them to wait and see until there are low cost receivers available in mass production, and of course there are listeners using them. We are still very active on conventional Shortwave and Internet streaming, because there are listeners out-there, and there are regions in the world where Shortwave is still popular, still listened to. According to what we hear from missionaries in Africa, the Far and Middle East and S America DRM will have a hard time to be popular in those regions for some time (if ever), due to the high cost associated in the conversion of the present Shortwave and Medium Wave receivers to DRM capable devices. Unfortunately we have seen something similar to DRM today happening for satellite radio in Europe and WorldSpace, another promising technology marketed initially for listeners in Africa, and confined for years to embassies, consulates and a bunch of rich people on that continent. DRM, Worldspace and satellite radio in Europe, Africa and Asia are NOT what XM and Sirius are today in the USA. We wish they could be, maybe, sometime in the future. http://www.egradio.org/index.php?name=FAQ&id_cat=7 Then I ran this hit count forhttp://drm.org- http://siteanalytics.compete.com/drm.org/?metric=uv It looks almost dead. Is DRM causing much interference on SW, and does DRM appear to be a bust? �I could only find a handful of very expensive DRM receivers. Radio Shack has indicated that they are not interested, and Sangean put their DRM receiver on hold. �Thanks.... DRM is a waste of time and resources. �To produce transmitters before the receivers are commonly available is just plain dumb - not to mention the fact that there's no consumer demand for it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I wonder, if he called Struble and said, "hey, that hdradiofarce guy is bothering us, now!". "Goddamnit, he's sending us those Goddamn website traffic analysis graphs, too!" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Future of DRM on SW?
On Jul 31, 7:55*pm, KaitoWRX911 wrote:
On Jul 31, 9:58 am, Rfburns wrote: On Jul 30, 5:13 pm, KaitoWRX911 wrote: "Why don't you use DRM on Shortwave?" DRM is the acronym of Digital Radio Mondiale, a new technology intended to offer digital, almost FM, quality to Shortwave, Long Wave and Medium Wave (AM) broadcasts. Unfortunately DRM is incompatible with ordinary Shortwave radios and requires buying new receivers, that are not currently available in mass production, or at a cost that is anywhere close to a conventional, analogue Shortwave receiver. Some DRM receivers requires a PC and a special device to listen to DRM signals. Our transmitters are DRM capable, and we already run preliminary tests with our own developed DRM encoders. We are ready to broadcast using DRM at any time, but unfortunately there are no mass produced receivers for our listeners to buy at a decent price, and - most importantly - there are no listeners for DRM at present. DRM is a very promising technology, has a 2-3 year delay over original plans, and it is still confined as a technological experiment. Will it be successful, meaning that we will see soon lots of listeners embracing it? Ask the man in the street: unfortunately marketing efforts to create awareness of this new potential media have not been started yet. Some large companies are pushing DRM by convincing program producers and broadcasters to start airing in DRM ahead of time, but unless there is mass availability and penetration of receivers on the listeners side, this will remain - unfortunately - a technological experiment, and broadcasters using it to reach their listeners now, are clearly throwing their money out of the window. Similar "experiments" were run in the past using analogue & digital satellite radio and WorldSpace. They failed miserably in reaching an audience for different reasons. We have been following with great interest the development of DRM, and as soon as one of our members send us a request to start DRM broadcasts we will do it. Currently we advise them to wait and see until there are low cost receivers available in mass production, and of course there are listeners using them. We are still very active on conventional Shortwave and Internet streaming, because there are listeners out-there, and there are regions in the world where Shortwave is still popular, still listened to. According to what we hear from missionaries in Africa, the Far and Middle East and S America DRM will have a hard time to be popular in those regions for some time (if ever), due to the high cost associated in the conversion of the present Shortwave and Medium Wave receivers to DRM capable devices. Unfortunately we have seen something similar to DRM today happening for satellite radio in Europe and WorldSpace, another promising technology marketed initially for listeners in Africa, and confined for years to embassies, consulates and a bunch of rich people on that continent. DRM, Worldspace and satellite radio in Europe, Africa and Asia are NOT what XM and Sirius are today in the USA. We wish they could be, maybe, sometime in the future. http://www.egradio.org/index.php?name=FAQ&id_cat=7 Then I ran this hit count forhttp://drm.org- http://siteanalytics.compete.com/drm.org/?metric=uv It looks almost dead. Is DRM causing much interference on SW, and does DRM appear to be a bust? I could only find a handful of very expensive DRM receivers. Radio Shack has indicated that they are not interested, and Sangean put their DRM receiver on hold. Thanks... DRM is a waste of time and resources. To produce transmitters before the receivers are commonly available is just plain dumb - not to mention the fact that there's no consumer demand for it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - - I wonder, if he called Struble and said, - "hey, that hdradiofarce guy is bothering us, now!". -*"Goddamnit, he's sending us those Goddamn - website traffic analysis graphs, too!" KaitoWRX911, You are a vast growing figment of your own over-active imagination. d r m on . . . ~ rhf |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Future of DRM on SW?
In article
, KaitoWRX911 wrote: On Jul 31, 9:58?am, Rfburns wrote: On Jul 30, 5:13 pm, KaitoWRX911 wrote: "Why don't you use DRM on Shortwave?" DRM is the acronym of Digital Radio Mondiale, a new technology intended to offer digital, almost FM, quality to Shortwave, Long Wave and Medium Wave (AM) broadcasts. Unfortunately DRM is incompatible with ordinary Shortwave radios and requires buying new receivers, that are not currently available in mass production, or at a cost that is anywhere close to a conventional, analogue Shortwave receiver. Some DRM receivers requires a PC and a special device to listen to DRM signals. Our transmitters are DRM capable, and we already run preliminary tests with our own developed DRM encoders. We are ready to broadcast using DRM at any time, but unfortunately there are no mass produced receivers for our listeners to buy at a decent price, and - most importantly - there are no listeners for DRM at present. DRM is a very promising technology, has a 2-3 year delay over original plans, and it is still confined as a technological experiment. Will it be successful, meaning that we will see soon lots of listeners embracing it? Ask the man in the street: unfortunately marketing efforts to create awareness of this new potential media have not been started yet. Some large companies are pushing DRM by convincing program producers and broadcasters to start airing in DRM ahead of time, but unless there is mass availability and penetration of receivers on the listeners side, this will remain - unfortunately - a technological experiment, and broadcasters using it to reach their listeners now, are clearly throwing their money out of the window. Similar "experiments" were run in the past using analogue & digital satellite radio and WorldSpace. They failed miserably in reaching an audience for different reasons. We have been following with great interest the development of DRM, and as soon as one of our members send us a request to start DRM broadcasts we will do it. Currently we advise them to wait and see until there are low cost receivers available in mass production, and of course there are listeners using them. We are still very active on conventional Shortwave and Internet streaming, because there are listeners out-there, and there are regions in the world where Shortwave is still popular, still listened to. According to what we hear from missionaries in Africa, the Far and Middle East and S America DRM will have a hard time to be popular in those regions for some time (if ever), due to the high cost associated in the conversion of the present Shortwave and Medium Wave receivers to DRM capable devices. Unfortunately we have seen something similar to DRM today happening for satellite radio in Europe and WorldSpace, another promising technology marketed initially for listeners in Africa, and confined for years to embassies, consulates and a bunch of rich people on that continent. DRM, Worldspace and satellite radio in Europe, Africa and Asia are NOT what XM and Sirius are today in the USA. We wish they could be, maybe, sometime in the future. http://www.egradio.org/index.php?name=FAQ&id_cat=7 Then I ran this hit count forhttp://drm.org- http://siteanalytics.compete.com/drm.org/?metric=uv It looks almost dead. Is DRM causing much interference on SW, and does DRM appear to be a bust? ?I could only find a handful of very expensive DRM receivers. Radio Shack has indicated that they are not interested, and Sangean put their DRM receiver on hold. ?Thanks... DRM is a waste of time and resources. ?To produce transmitters before the receivers are commonly available is just plain dumb - not to mention the fact that there's no consumer demand for it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It appears that SW listeners have little interest in DRM. The hit count on drm.org is only a couple of hundred/month, and falling. There are only a couple of very expensive DRM receivers and they are battery-hogs. Of couse, just as with SiPort's IBOC chip that never materialized, Samsung's IBOC chip is a battery-hog and is too large for devices, such as cell phones. Here is a copy of a letter that I sent to drm.org, yesterday: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------- To Whom It May Concern: I am wondering about the future of DRM - I came across this article, which indicated that DRM is pretty much DOA: "Why don't you use DRM on Shortwave?" "Some large companies are pushing DRM by convincing program producers and broadcasters to start airing in DRM ahead of time, but unless there is mass availability and penetration of receivers on the listeners side, this will remain - unfortunately - a technological experiment, and broadcasters using it to reach their listeners now, are clearly throwing their money out of the window." http://www.egradio.org/index.php?name=FAQ&id_cat=7 Then, I ran this website traffic analysis of http://drm.org - http://siteanalytics.compete.com/drm.org/?metric=uv It looks almost dead. I understand that DRM is causing interference on SW, as is HD Radio/IBOC on AM/FM in the US. I could only find a handful of very expensive DRM receivers. Radio Shack has indicated that they are not interested, and Sangean has put their DRM MP40 receiver on hold. Any thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- If you look at the drm.og website, the hyped picture of the girl listening to DRM appears to be almost a mirror image of the fraudulently hyped pictures on iBiquity's and HD Radio Alliance's websites. That's Alice in the looking glass and DRM is just as fraudulent as IBOC. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ford sniffs the future... And the future is spelled "SYNC" it seems,not "HD." | Shortwave | |||
Future | Shortwave | |||
The future of shortwave? | Shortwave | |||
I see a neg in your future.. | Scanner | |||
A look at our future? | Broadcasting |