Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 31, 6:58*am, Rfburns wrote:
On Jul 30, 5:13 pm, KaitoWRX911 wrote: "Why don't you use DRM on Shortwave?" DRM is the acronym of Digital Radio Mondiale, a new technology intended to offer digital, almost FM, quality to Shortwave, Long Wave and Medium Wave (AM) broadcasts. Unfortunately DRM is incompatible with ordinary Shortwave radios and requires buying new receivers, that are not currently available in mass production, or at a cost that is anywhere close to a conventional, analogue Shortwave receiver. Some DRM receivers requires a PC and a special device to listen to DRM signals. Our transmitters are DRM capable, and we already run preliminary tests with our own developed DRM encoders. We are ready to broadcast using DRM at any time, but unfortunately there are no mass produced receivers for our listeners to buy at a decent price, and - most importantly - there are no listeners for DRM at present. DRM is a very promising technology, has a 2-3 year delay over original plans, and it is still confined as a technological experiment. Will it be successful, meaning that we will see soon lots of listeners embracing it? Ask the man in the street: unfortunately marketing efforts to create awareness of this new potential media have not been started yet. Some large companies are pushing DRM by convincing program producers and broadcasters to start airing in DRM ahead of time, but unless there is mass availability and penetration of receivers on the listeners side, this will remain - unfortunately - a technological experiment, and broadcasters using it to reach their listeners now, are clearly throwing their money out of the window. Similar "experiments" were run in the past using analogue & digital satellite radio and WorldSpace. They failed miserably in reaching an audience for different reasons. We have been following with great interest the development of DRM, and as soon as one of our members send us a request to start DRM broadcasts we will do it. Currently we advise them to wait and see until there are low cost receivers available in mass production, and of course there are listeners using them. We are still very active on conventional Shortwave and Internet streaming, because there are listeners out-there, and there are regions in the world where Shortwave is still popular, still listened to. According to what we hear from missionaries in Africa, the Far and Middle East and S America DRM will have a hard time to be popular in those regions for some time (if ever), due to the high cost associated in the conversion of the present Shortwave and Medium Wave receivers to DRM capable devices. Unfortunately we have seen something similar to DRM today happening for satellite radio in Europe and WorldSpace, another promising technology marketed initially for listeners in Africa, and confined for years to embassies, consulates and a bunch of rich people on that continent. DRM, Worldspace and satellite radio in Europe, Africa and Asia are NOT what XM and Sirius are today in the USA. We wish they could be, maybe, sometime in the future. http://www.egradio.org/index.php?name=FAQ&id_cat=7 Then I ran this hit count forhttp://drm.org- http://siteanalytics.compete.com/drm.org/?metric=uv It looks almost dead. Is DRM causing much interference on SW, and does DRM appear to be a bust? *I could only find a handful of very expensive DRM receivers. Radio Shack has indicated that they are not interested, and Sangean put their DRM receiver on hold. *Thanks... - DRM is a waste of time and resources. -*To produce transmitters before the receivers are commonly - available is just plain dumb - not to mention the fact that - there's no consumer demand for it. D'Oh ! - Chicken-or-Egg - Which Came First ? The Future of New Radio Technologies . . . Will Radio Stagnate and Die as a Popular Public Meda ? Or - Will Radio Embrace New Technology and Survive ? But your are right; without a Natural Path of Migration DRM is subject to slow or no grow {is doa}. -IF- the European Grovernments are 'committed' to DRM : Then they should have mandated that all new AM/FM Shortwave Radios that are made or imported into Europe are fully DRM Capable. Note - That also goes for RDS and DAB Eureka 147 in the EU too. Radio (TV) functions well as a commonly available Public Media : When there is a 'balance' between Number of Broadcasters {Amount of Broadcasting and Number of Receivers and Radio Listeners. For Radio as a Media the Car and Truck are the best method of introducing 'the public' to new forms of Radio. People change / exchange their Cars and Trucks more often then they replace / buy a new Radio. This applies equally as well to RDS, DRM, DAB Eureka 147, and IBOC HD-Radio as new forms of Radio. The swiftest Natural Path of Migration for new forms of Radio is Government Mandates for Standard Receivers with priority implementation in Car and Truck Radio by a given date/year. * Once this "Mandate" occurs; the Number the newly manufactured New Technology Radios increases with each Year. * The Cost of these New Technology Radios decreases with each Year. * The Public Adapts to and Uses the New Technology Radios more and more with each passing Year. Note - Government Mandates are done in the Public Interest for the general good of a society. Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) - Eureka 147 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Audio_Broadcasting Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale Radio Data System (RDS) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Data_System In-Band On-Channel (IBOC) -aka- HD-Radio http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-band_on-channel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_Radio |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ford sniffs the future... And the future is spelled "SYNC" it seems,not "HD." | Shortwave | |||
Future | Shortwave | |||
The future of shortwave? | Shortwave | |||
I see a neg in your future.. | Scanner | |||
A look at our future? | Broadcasting |