Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: When you look at ANY station's modulation monitor, the excursion range seldom goes below 80% to 85% and is clipped hard at 100%. Talk radio does not need a large dynamic range but 6 dB seems to small. It seems to me that the sound levels vary more than 4 X. "It seems to you." That must be the IEEE "ISTY" standard for modulation density, right? 6 db is not much. Good audio is more like 80 to 100 dB. Not on the radio, where the ambient noise in most listening locations does not permit that degree of dynamic range. And you criticize me for using widely accepted and broadly syndicated Arbitron data used by all significant top 300 market stations in the US, but you have taken on the job of being the standard for modulation all by your lonesome. You are nuts. As I said, if I am all you accuse me of, then everyone in the radio industry and even its suppliers is also nuts. I tend to think that you, the lone doubter, are the one in need of attention. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I love reading iBiquitys announcements about hybrid digital radio | Shortwave | |||
The Problem With Hybrid Digital | Shortwave | |||
Anyone know why AM Radio "Hybrid Digital" sounds so bad? | Shortwave | |||
Screw HD Radio iBiquity Digital | Shortwave | |||
HD Hybrid Digital radio. Satellite sirius and xm radio. | Shortwave |