| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: It's called a concept. I understand music bands have been engaged in the same process trying to sound louder than the other bands. Untrue. The "loudness" is done in mixdown and mastering. Most producers of contemporary music look for a heavy, dense sound. What radio stations do today is wrong and the listenership is falling off. I see. People are going to 128 kbs mp3's because radio sounds bad? Again, the limited dynamic range is necessary to keep al program content above the noise level of the listening environment. Radio is not the same as listening to a CD. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| I love reading iBiquitys announcements about hybrid digital radio | Shortwave | |||
| The Problem With Hybrid Digital | Shortwave | |||
| Anyone know why AM Radio "Hybrid Digital" sounds so bad? | Shortwave | |||
| Screw HD Radio iBiquity Digital | Shortwave | |||
| HD Hybrid Digital radio. Satellite sirius and xm radio. | Shortwave | |||