On Jul 12, 12:57�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message

...

The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic
Broadcasting is #18.

Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It
ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago.

Notice hit #29 from the DOJ.

Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or
check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't
find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do
not peruse those sites.

The second section
are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4.

Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend
machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless
cards, are personal accounts.

I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a
company that has not existed for nearly 6 years.

This was run on Friday. LOL!

I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to
believe your own fabrications.

You're a kick to spar with.

"The Real Story"

"What many forget is that using this much bandwidth has always been
permitted within the defined AM channel bandpass of FCC Rules and NRSC
mask limits. Ibiquity is very much aware that the digital sidebands
contain higher average energy than analog splatter and can become
significant interference. Accordingly, it's been proposing more
restrictive specifications for the HD Radio transmissions mask that
afford much more protection for third adjacent channel stations than
currently required under FCC Rule 73.44."

http://www.radioworld.com/section/section/article/1842

And, that iBiquity took advantage of the loophole in FCC Rule 73.44,
in order to jam adjacents off the dial?