Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Condensing the health care argument into one article?
Wonderfully written and speaks what a lot of us are thinking.
The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. In my view, health care is not a right and never will be, it is only a luxury afforded by a prosperous economy that is willing to provide charity for the indigent, if not out of guilt of conscience for its lack of decent paying minimum wages, then out of the principals of helping the poor and the old by the younger and the stronger as required by a higher power who delegates such responsibilities to ourselves. Insurance is not the problem when the prevailing wage does not make such coverage as easy to obtain as food, and when such coverage is more expensive than food, I question its usefulness, validity, and demand that the best economists in the land redefine our goals and articulate them to prevent such nonsense. Otherwise we find that given power and strength, we should not be hurting the weak, but protecting them, and the natural human condition is one of strength, not of weakness, when we consider the design of such matters. For I say health care is not a right, but perhaps the consequences of your choices in life, for which the public may or may not have control over, and not left up to the political hacks of the day that foment and garner the votes of throngs of high school drop outs as standard campaign strategies, and yet if we remove the personal responsibility from the equation, we also remove personal responsibility from government? Hence the following partial argument that mandatory "health care credit" program is far superior to any "health care insurance" program, since credit is based on responsibility and participation, and the other is based on the luck of the draw? Which is more civilized pray tell, would you treat an angel with a credit program or a lottery program (since the public adores stories of alien worlds)? For the crux of the legal and Constitutional argument is this, by making health care a "right", then who is to stop the community from calling you in the middle of the night to provide free taxi service to a hooker or a pimp down the street as a "right"? Does health care involve paying a doctor or the use of private medical equipment and facilities? Is that not covered under the 5th amendment, the government shall not seize private property without compensation? If your personal car is your property, who are you to demand that a syringe, a bed, or the time of a doctor is yours upon demand? The 5th Amendment prohibits the Government from providing free taxi service to hookers or pimps, or from buying health care insurance, light bulbs, or white paint, or any other edict by any "title of nobility", or public official, at your individual expense, that is what has made America the greatest country on Earth. Frankly I see the problem as this, local and state taxes already provide enormous funds to provide for expensive health care as a matter of charity, and it is not a free ride. If they do discover that you can pay for the services rendered, they will place liens on your property to get the funds, so the media creating the illusion that there is some sort of crisis is disingenuous and down right deceptive in my opinion. And the "problems" should be solved by those who administer solutions, not political activists in power who cater to the whims of high school drop outs who are paying scant attention not because they are too busy administrating public opinion, but recreational drugs without abandon, each according to his ability, and to each his need. CPA's, and medical professionals the private market should be providing solutions, and without a blank check mentality, the costs should be well articulated, including the expected inflationary costs and reviewed on a quarterly basis in light of all the unemployed people with accounting and other clerical experience in our country. Instead of using a health "lottery" insurance financial model, by going to a health "credit" model where you are guaranteed credit to pay for your treatment and recovery (healing) process, there is much more incentive for industry to price services so that you can pay them back without seizing your assets, because you will have an active interest, and the incentive to not only prevent injury through poor personal decisions or negligence, but provide real care that keeps you alive long enough to pay them back is also part of the process, instead of treating you like a number, or a sausage in a food factory where no one will miss you being tossed in the garbage if a careless employee drops you on the floor. Providing unlimited tax deductions to the wealthy is another avenue that seems to be refused to be considered or allowed by the power hungry political machine and gullible public community, for which we only have ourselves to blame. This is not a comprehensive identification of all problems, but a highlight of those that come to the writers mind, for which I have articulated weeks ago, and yet the media continues to ignore, for which I say "no" means "yes" when I only have to write this another way, like a fisherman casting his line in a different spot in the pond? Would Senator Baucus even understand this article, and if not, should he be re-elected? End of article and comment, which includes an introductory legal disclaimer, written by talent, on loan, from God, with thanks giving, with a special thank you to the Rush Limbaugh Advanced Institute for Conservative Studies for helping to articulate this message. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Health care does not affect the economy | Shortwave | |||
Health Care is not constitutionally based | Shortwave | |||
Health Care is not constitutionally based | Shortwave | |||
Liberal Lies About National Health Care | Shortwave | |||
Obama's socialized health care | Shortwave |