The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the
right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your
own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who
may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer)
for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the
entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you
apparently want to live in an imaginary world.

What was the first response, but from an angry queer (the first sign
of a queer is the f-bomb, in order to counter the demons in their head
demanding they chop off their egg rolls, like the queer that committed
suicide after helping defeat the Nazis, and they are already angry at
everyone?) who has no interest in explaining that the proposed health
care legislation destroys the insurance industry, and will force
everyone to share the costs of medical care and eliminate the concept
of personal responsibility, which will destroy the ability to provide
medical care (which is based on capacity, not imagination) to all but
the young who are not sick?

If you mandate coverage, you do not have any risk, you have only
costs, at which they are GUESSING since they can not explain how to
pay for it? Who cares if you have have health care coverage that is
rationed if you don't have a job and must live in a mud hut, ride a
bike, and put up with drug addicts who still buy narcotics even though
it has blood money all over it?

Don't take my word for it, ask why they can't wait two days to read
the bill, that should explain everything?

Resistance is futile, the biological and technical uniqueness of the
Democrats will be assimilated by the truth....

Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:


If you mandate coverage, you do not have any risk, you have only
costs, at which they are GUESSING since they can not explain how to
pay for it? Who cares if you have have health care coverage that is
rationed if you don't have a job and must live in a mud hut, ride a
bike, and put up with drug addicts who still buy narcotics even though
it has blood money all over it?


Young people should be required to buy insurance in case they have
accidents. Otherwise, let 'em die on the ski slopes.

On Dec 17, 6:31*pm, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:

If you mandate coverage, you do not have any risk, you have only
costs, at which they are GUESSING since they can not explain how to
pay for it? *Who cares if you have have health care coverage that is
rationed if you don't have a job and must live in a mud hut, ride a
bike, and put up with drug addicts who still buy narcotics even though
it has blood money all over it?

Which, of course, is not the chosen path in life for most people
living in countries with universal coverage, but does seem to be the
chosen path in life for a lot of Americans in a country with no
universal coverage. Interesting.


Don't take my word for it, ask why they can't wait two days to read
the bill, that should explain everything?

Don't worry, we won't take your word for it, or any words you churn
out as supposedly having any basis in fact and/or reality.

Daily Born in Kenya!
DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB
ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Tracking Poll.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=279779

MINUS TWENTY ONE PERCENT.
MINUS TWENTY ONE PERCENT.
MINUS TWENTY ONE PERCENT.
Eeeeeeeeeee Heeeeeeee Heeeeeeeee,,, HAW HAW HAW.
Just got to LOVE it!
cuhulin