Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Bob Dobbs wrote: When there is audio (modulation) present, there most certainly is a carrier, otherwise it's suppressed and therefore problematic for sync-det. If someone were to modulate their SSB signal with anything close to a steady tone the sync-det could possibly get a lock. note* - there isn't a way to engage the sync-det in either of the SSB modes on the only radio I have that has it. No. Most ham rigs made since 1980 don't actually produce an AM signal, they produce a double sideband reduced carrier signal. Ham rigs produce a signal by taking an AM signal and running it through a filter to remove the carrier and the other sideband. Their "AM" mode signal is made by recombining the the upper and lower sideband signals, with only a tiny residual carrier. Most AM receivers can receive this signal, but there is no carrier to lock on to, so I doubt that a sync detector can lock onto them. But that's exactly the situation for a synchronous detector. An AM signal reaches your receiver, but the carrier is too weak due to selective fading. The issue is the strength of the carrier to the sidebands, if the carrier is too weak it will sound like overmodulation (which it is, just at the receiver rather than transmitter). You can reinsert the carrier at the receiver, but with DSB of some sort, you don't know where to set it properly. It's not just the issue of single sideband where a mistuned receiver will shift the audio by a certain amount (which one can live with), but with DSB if each sideband doesn't translate down to the same audio frequency (which would happen if the BFO isn't in the right spot), then the two sidebands clash. If the incoming carrier is weak, the issue of beating against the local carrier from the BFO is a secondary issue. A sync detector figures out where to place the missing carrier whether the carrier is weak or not, or even whether there is a carrier. It doesn't matter if the carrier was weak compared to the sidebands when the signal left the transmitter, for if the carrier was weakened along the way to your receiver. Which brings up another issue. Everyone talks about sync detectors, but there are a variety of schemes, which do end up operating differently. People think the sync detector is vital, yet then "some work better than others". Some of that may be due to the specific scheme used to provide the feature, while in other cases it can be due to bad implementation of a specific scheme. The stereotype of the phase locked loop locking to the carrier of the incoming signal and then that is used as the BFO to translate the signal down to audio, that may be the least used. It's certainly similar to schemes where the carrier is simply amplified a lot in reference to the sidebands (like the scheme to use a Q-multiplier to raise the level of the incoming carrier compared to the sidebands) or a very narrow IF strip is used to isolate and amplify the incoming carrier and then fed to the product detector. They work, but if the carrier disappears, they go out of lock, and they certainly aren't as versatile as some others. (I gather the Drake R7 used a detector along these lines). There was a whole wave of detectors for DSB in "Ham Radio" magazine in the seventies, and the next scheme up was to get the location of the missing carrier by looking at the sidebands. Double the frequency of the incoming signal, and then divide it back, and you'd get a signal right in the middle. Since the sidebands are duplicate of each other Use a town at the transmitter to make it simple, a 1KHz tone. A 10MHz DSB signal will then have an output at 9.999MHz and 10.001MHz, if you add those up you will get 10MHz, and it will remain 10MHz no matter where that tone goes. The 10MHz is exactly in the right spot to properly translate the sidebands back to audio, and that's what you want. When Webb described the "synchronous detector" in CQ about 1958, the intent was to demodulate DSB with no carrier. (The carrier doesn't carry content, it just means you don't need a BFO at the receiver or a means to know where it should be set, but the carrier does use power, while the two sidebands provide information about where the carrier should be, and allow for some level of diversity reception by selecting one of the two sidebands.). It doesn't lock to the carrier, since no carrier was expected. It uses information from outputs of the product detectors (yes two of them) to show where to place the reinserted carrier. It works with any DSB signal, whether it has a carrier or not. It won't demodulate SSB since there is no information on where to place the BFO in reference to the sideband, you need to unlock the loop since the PLL will otherwise try to lock to what it can't find and thus not tune properly. This type of detector is very similar to the "sideband slicer" and other such products that used the phasing method of sideband reception for SSB, allowing one to select upper or lower sideband by the proper combination of phased signals, the addition being the circuitry to lock the BFO to the proper place. I gather that's the common type of sync detector in most receivers nowadays, but I don't know for sure. One can have that sort of arrangement, that does lock to the sidebands, without fully decoding the two sidebands separately, and there seems to be receivers that don't provide for that selectible sideband. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|