Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 5:17*pm, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:58*pm, SMS wrote: But there actually is something to the article in The Register. If Europe wants to get serious about digital radio they need to adopt the system used in the U.S. which has gained acceptance by (a decreasing number of ) broadcasters, (some) receiver manufacturers, (some) automakers, and (practically no) consumers. There was never any such quote in the Register article - SMS is lying again. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
iBiquity Fraudsters wrote:
On Mar 7, 5:17 pm, spamtrap1888 wrote: On Mar 4, 7:58 pm, SMS wrote: But there actually is something to the article in The Register. If Europe wants to get serious about digital radio they need to adopt the system used in the U.S. which has gained acceptance by (a decreasing number of ) broadcasters, (some) receiver manufacturers, (some) automakers, and (practically no) consumers. There was never any such quote in the Register article - SMS is lying again. And besides, as far as I understand it, HD-Radio was rejected over here, because it doesn't meet interference standards. :-o |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() In article , Richard Evans wrote: iBiquity Fraudsters wrote: On Mar 7, 5:17 pm, spamtrap1888 wrote: On Mar 4, 7:58 pm, SMS wrote: But there actually is something to the article in The Register. If Europe wants to get serious about digital radio they need to adopt the system used in the U.S. which has gained acceptance by (a decreasing number of ) broadcasters, (some) receiver manufacturers, (some) automakers, and (practically no) consumers. There was never any such quote in the Register article - SMS is lying again. And besides, as far as I understand it, HD-Radio was rejected over here, because it doesn't meet interference standards. :-o Richard, I think you overlooked that "iBiquity Fraudsters" mistook "spamtrap's" paraphrasing for SMS's actual posting. Gosh, a stupid troll...what are the odds???!!! Patty |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patty Winter wrote:
And besides, as far as I understand it, HD-Radio was rejected over here, because it doesn't meet interference standards. :-o Richard, I think you overlooked that "iBiquity Fraudsters" mistook "spamtrap's" paraphrasing for SMS's actual posting. Gosh, a stupid troll...what are the odds???!!! Actually I didn't look that closely, I was wanted to point out that Europe is never likely to adopt HD-Radio over here, and mention the interference problems. As far as I remember there was one trial in Germany, and it was rejected. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO! | Shortwave | |||
HD Radio shutdown in Wash, D.C! LMFAO! | Shortwave | |||
FS: Sector 220 FM portable | Swap | |||
FS: Sector 220 MHz Portable | Swap | |||
Brother Stair infests Europe's MW band. | Shortwave |