Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 3:50*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 3:46 PM, John Smith wrote: On 6/2/2011 12:42 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... That could be where all those billions of tonnes worth of helium are hidden, as under a shell/layer of hydrogen, or as otherwise getting solar heated and wind blown away from the gravity pool we call Earth. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet The "gravity pool we call earth" is actually the substance of matter of the earth displacing a bit of ether, the ether which has been displaced creates a pressure to attempt to fill the void created, this IS gravity.. Much like immersing a balloon in a tub of water, pressure exists on all points of the surface of the balloon ... so it is with the ether. And, to see that, we have to agree, if you take an atoms from the case of my computer, blow those atoms up to the size of oranges, the next atom of the material will be a full football field away, or around there! Our matter is mostly "nothing", however, ether fills this space, this "nothing." But, the actually substance of the particles composing the atoms DO displace their equal volume of ether. Now, you won't find that in a textbook, will you? Think about it ... this is how the mechanics of the quantum nature of things can work, so invisibly. Or, another way to picture it, is all of the matter we can look at, feel, sense, etc. is simply "dissolved" in the ether ... Regards, JS Dissolved wasn't quite right in the above ... More like stick a sponge in a tub of water, the water fills every possible void in the sponge, like ether does with matter ... Regards, JS Right about that, and if this ether existence or whatever flow should be FTL, as such we're never going to detect it, unless freezing it to death at 0 K does the trick. We can't see or otherwise detect the actual flow or existence of a gravity wave or that illusive graviton, perhaps because it's running at 2c or faster. If an original monochromatic photon is not directed at the detector, can that original photon still be detected? (such as from a perpendicular, off to the side location) http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/2/2011 4:09 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
... Right about that, and if this ether existence or whatever flow should be FTL, as such we're never going to detect it, unless freezing it to death at 0 K does the trick. We can't see or otherwise detect the actual flow or existence of a gravity wave or that illusive graviton, perhaps because it's running at 2c or faster. If an original monochromatic photon is not directed at the detector, can that original photon still be detected? (such as from a perpendicular, off to the side location) http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Yeah, that is a whole nother' can of worms ... truly-mass-less-ether ... and, enters Michio Kakus' string theory. And, if these guys have a hard problem with ether, just think about the jump into that cesspool! Basically, then, you must say, "There is no such thing as "matter", there is only vibrations and frequencies ... I guess "vibrating ether" .... ;-) ROFLOL Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|