Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
travel through empty space, as defined by mainstream FUD-masters
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
travel through empty space, as defined by mainstream FUD-masters
On 6/22/2011 6:15 AM, dave wrote:
... I don't care. I was addressing the idea that 1920 is a long time ago, in terms of research. There's no such thing as "aether". Magnetic lines of force exist around magnets and energized conductors. They require no medium. ROFLOL! Regards, JS |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
RADIO-WAVES do travel through empty space, as defined by mainstreamFUD-masters
On 6/22/2011 1:55 AM, HVAC wrote:
... Why do you god believers have such a hard-on for ether? Is it because neither actually exists? Is that it? No. It is because they you have to look like you, a complete moron, to deny this is all a creation of a creator, and something can exist within nothing ... Such doesn't bother complete idiots ... others can't bring themselves to do it ... Regards, JS |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
RADIO-WAVES do travel through empty space, as defined by mainstreamFUD-masters
On 6/22/2011 1:55 AM, HVAC wrote:
... Why do you god believers have such a hard-on for ether? Is it because neither actually exists? Is that it? No. It is because they would have to be willing to look like you, a complete moron, to deny this is all a creation of a creator, and something can exist within nothing ... it takes a mind of certain capabilities to be able to use logic and reason, and allowing the individual(s) in question the ability to conventionalize the complexities ... to realize what platforms are necessary to set this all in motion, to have it in existence ... To morons, the answer is simple, "It all just happened." And, "It just did it on its' own." Such doesn't bother complete idiots ... indeed, this serves as good enough explanation to them, works on children and retards too, and for good reasons! It is obvious, Einstein was on to something ... Regards, JS |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
As opposed to?
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:08:23 -0500, Free Lunch
wrote: It wasn't "the social agenda", you just had an insane teacher. Insane religious teacher. But they were allowed to do that back when. Teaching religious belief in public schools wasn't only allowed, it was completely legal. (And if you were a different religion than the one being taught to your kids, that was tough. Move.) -- A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it. - Wilde |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
RADIO-WAVES do travel through empty space, as defined bymainstream FUD-masters
On Jun 22, 7:35*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/22/2011 1:55 AM, HVAC wrote: ... Why do you god believers have such a hard-on for ether? Is it because neither actually exists? Is that it? No. It is because they would have to be willing to look like you, a complete moron, to deny this is all a creation of a creator, and something can exist within nothing ... it takes a mind of certain capabilities to be able to use logic and reason, and allowing the individual(s) in question the ability to conventionalize the complexities ... to realize what platforms are necessary to set this all in motion, to have it in existence ... To morons, the answer is simple, "It all just happened." *And, "It just did it on its' own." *Such doesn't bother complete idiots ... indeed, this serves as good enough explanation to them, works on children and retards too, and for good reasons! It is obvious, Einstein was on to something ... Regards, JS If an aetherist really wanted to throw an iron in the fire, he could validate himself first by claiming that Einstein's Theory of Relativity is not a Law, but just a theory. In that sense, a theory cannot be proven. But there are other ways of stating the formula: E=m_e(c^2)=lambda_e(W_k)(W_x)=e(W_x), where lambda_e represents the wavelength of the electron, W_k represents the wave intrinsic to the particle (or to the linear momentum carried by the massfree particle, usu. equal to de Broglie's pilot or group wave, with W_x representing the particle, or "extrinsic" to momentum, that is analogous to de Broglie's phase wave, and "e" representing the charge of the electron). Thus the Einstein equation offers only the electromagnetic portion of mass-energy, and must be taken into consideration with the fine structure of the mass-energy, as the fine structure relates to the condensate of the "aether", and not the electromagnetic field. Enter scalar electromagnetics, where the electron represents a spherical standing wave with an "in" portion and "out" portion. Each of their "potential" amplitudes are actually infinite at the center of the spherical standing wave, but when both opposites are forced to combine, they form a standing wave of finite amplitude. That amplitude is a scalar, and not an electromagnetic vector. Thus the speed of light is not so much a barrier as it is a speed of energy exchange. American "Feynman died in 1988 before his partner John Wheeler met Peter Lynds who is now promoting an ancient Greek theory on Infinity." - The Brodericks, on the movie "Infinity - Feynman" |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
RADIO-WAVES do travel through empty space, as defined by mainstreamFUD-masters
On 6/22/2011 8:56 AM, American wrote:
On Jun 22, 7:35 am, John wrote: On 6/22/2011 1:55 AM, HVAC wrote: ... Why do you god believers have such a hard-on for ether? Is it because neither actually exists? Is that it? No. It is because they would have to be willing to look like you, a complete moron, to deny this is all a creation of a creator, and something can exist within nothing ... it takes a mind of certain capabilities to be able to use logic and reason, and allowing the individual(s) in question the ability to conventionalize the complexities ... to realize what platforms are necessary to set this all in motion, to have it in existence ... To morons, the answer is simple, "It all just happened." And, "It just did it on its' own." Such doesn't bother complete idiots ... indeed, this serves as good enough explanation to them, works on children and retards too, and for good reasons! It is obvious, Einstein was on to something ... Regards, JS If an aetherist really wanted to throw an iron in the fire, he could validate himself first by claiming that Einstein's Theory of Relativity is not a Law, but just a theory. In that sense, a theory cannot be proven. But there are other ways of stating the formula: E=m_e(c^2)=lambda_e(W_k)(W_x)=e(W_x), where lambda_e represents the wavelength of the electron, W_k represents the wave intrinsic to the particle (or to the linear momentum carried by the massfree particle, usu. equal to de Broglie's pilot or group wave, with W_x representing the particle, or "extrinsic" to momentum, that is analogous to de Broglie's phase wave, and "e" representing the charge of the electron). Thus the Einstein equation offers only the electromagnetic portion of mass-energy, and must be taken into consideration with the fine structure of the mass-energy, as the fine structure relates to the condensate of the "aether", and not the electromagnetic field. Enter scalar electromagnetics, where the electron represents a spherical standing wave with an "in" portion and "out" portion. Each of their "potential" amplitudes are actually infinite at the center of the spherical standing wave, but when both opposites are forced to combine, they form a standing wave of finite amplitude. That amplitude is a scalar, and not an electromagnetic vector. Thus the speed of light is not so much a barrier as it is a speed of energy exchange. American "Feynman died in 1988 before his partner John Wheeler met Peter Lynds who is now promoting an ancient Greek theory on Infinity." - The Brodericks, on the movie "Infinity - Feynman" The truth is open to the eyes ... "Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction." -- Albert Einstein In a truly empty box, there is no room -- there is no "space", only an idiot could possibly call any container "empty" which contains "spacetime" or the ether, there simply would be nothing to hold the sides, top and bottom apart! You fall prey to the same mistake most make, if your ideas have been in error long enough, they become truth! However, on close examination, that is false, in itself ... Regards, JS |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
RADIO-WAVES do travel through empty space, as defined bymains...
Certain Radio Frequencies travel through the Earth too.U.S.Navy has, or
used to have, such a system.I read about that in one of my Popular Science snail mail magazines back in the 1960s.I also snail subscribe to Popular Mechanics magazine, maybe that article I read was in one of my 1960s Popular Mechanics magazines.That was a million years ago, so I don't exactly remember which magazine it was in. cuhulin, mit dur foggy memory |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
RADIO-WAVES do travel through empty space, as defined bymainst...
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RADIO-WAVES cannot travel through the empty medium of Space --All audio and video from Apollo-11, ISS, The Shuttle, are FAKE FAKE FAKE | Shortwave | |||
RADIO-WAVES cannot travel through the empty medium of Space --All audio and video from Apollo-11, ISS, The Shuttle, are FAKE FAKE FAKE | Shortwave | |||
Ebay'er radio-mart Using "Fake" Photo's? | Swap | |||
Amateur radio is fake ! | Homebrew |