On 6/3/11 18:25 , Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D. wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote:

Einstein was quite clear that space was a non-Euclidian construct.
That, in fact, it was quite flexible, and that there were no
straight lines.

That would mean there are no straight lines anywhere...if you think
about it.
;-)


Right.

On 6/3/2011 7:17 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 6/3/11 18:25 , Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D. wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote:

Einstein was quite clear that space was a non-Euclidian construct.
That, in fact, it was quite flexible, and that there were no
straight lines.

That would mean there are no straight lines anywhere...if you think
about it.
;-)


Right.

Oh, I'd say you can still create perfectly straight lines, however, NOT
with any device which measures "straight", which exists in the same
universe ... or, simply put, a perfectly straight line would appear
curved to us ...

Regards,
JS

I have an old Saturday Evening Post magazine (that magazine is in my
attic now, along with buku more magazines and books and junk) all about
when JFK was murdered in Dallas.I forget the exact date of that
magazine, I will look at it tomorrow when I go back up in my attic.Yep,
I bought that magazine at the Goodwill store a bunch of years ago.
cuhulin

Draw a line (straight or crooked line) on a piece of paper.That line is
3 Dimensional.
cuhulin

On 6/3/2011 7:33 PM, wrote:
Draw a line (straight or crooked line) on a piece of paper.That line is
3 Dimensional.
cuhulin


Something to do while waiting for the discounts to be marked on the
merchandise?

Regards,
JS

On 6/3/2011 7:52 PM, Brad Guth wrote:



Most of what seems like loose cannon or friendly fire is actually
intended to be lethal from the very get go.

These mainstream status-quo minions, parrots and brown-nosed clowns
have it in for anyone that doesn't follow their lead and worship each
and every word they have to say. The last thing they want to allow is
any revision of history or science/physics interpretations other than
peer approved by those which they worship as gods. So there's a wee
little problem with these FUD-masters whenever anything the least bit
different, new or improved comes along, and should by accident any
K12s show up, there's no way that this general K12 public is going to
be allowed to see or interpret things any other way than their
mainstream status-quo and/or closed mindset way.

Hitler as well as GW Bush needed that kind of blind loyalty, and for
the most part got it and then some.

William Mook has some capability of publishing the best available
truth(s) in K12 textbook format.


Guth: Do you honestly believe that ANYONE could read this and NOT
conclude that you are insane? And by insane, I mean BAT**** insane.




--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/3/2011 9:11 PM, John Smith wrote:


And, ether becomes of primary importance, or is paramount to discussions
on the subject ... let's just not develop a mental illness where we want
to prevent all others from ignoring-it/discussing-it ...


From discussing WHAT? Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated
EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?





How fitting, it all began with your personal opinions, then filling in
with personal attacks and tomfoolery, now back to personal opinion ...
full circle.


My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.






--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/4/2011 1:44 AM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/3/2011 9:11 PM, John Smith wrote:


And, ether becomes of primary importance, or is paramount to
discussions
on the subject ... let's just not develop a mental illness where we
want
to prevent all others from ignoring-it/discussing-it ...


From discussing WHAT? Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated
EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?





How fitting, it all began with your personal opinions, then filling in
with personal attacks and tomfoolery, now back to personal opinion ...
full circle.


My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On 6/4/2011 4:54 AM, John Smith wrote:



My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On 6/4/2011 2:10 AM, HVAC wrote:
On 6/4/2011 4:54 AM, John Smith wrote:



My 'tomfoolery' aside, you still haven't answered the question.


It isn't a question, it is an insane rant cloaked as a pseudo-question,
not deserving of an answer ... simply no need to acknowledge insanity,
the reasons are obvious.


Since ether doesn't exist, or can be treated EXACTLY
as if it doesn't exist, why bother to discuss it?


Yeah, that is about right, Einstein didn't exist either, or was wrong ...

ROFLOL!!!

.... tomfoolery ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry