On 6/11/2011 6:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


So, Mr. all-knowing wise guy spook/mole, tell us why the version of
history that involves JFK, as interpreted and told by William Mook is
wrong.

Who the **** is William Gook?

Real funny, but then aren't all FUD-masters.


I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?











--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Jun 11, 3:55*am, HVAC wrote:
On 6/11/2011 6:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote:



So, Mr. all-knowing wise guy spook/mole, tell us why the version of
history that involves JFK, as interpreted and told by William Mook is
wrong.

Who the **** is William Gook?

Real funny, but then aren't all FUD-masters.

I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?

--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girlhttp://www.youtube..com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

In other words, William Mook's interpretation of what got JFK and RFK
each killed isn't in dispute.

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On 6/11/2011 7:15 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


Real funny, but then aren't all FUD-masters.

I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?

--

In other words, William Mook's interpretation of what got JFK and RFK
each killed isn't in dispute.

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.


Again, do you EVER laugh?

Do you EVER have fun?









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Jun 11, 4:22*am, HVAC wrote:
On 6/11/2011 7:15 AM, Brad Guth wrote:











Real funny, but then aren't all FUD-masters.

I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?

--

In other words, William Mook's interpretation of what got JFK and RFK
each killed isn't in dispute.

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

Again, do you EVER laugh?

Do you EVER have fun?

For an old and cranky fat guy on a IV drip, you seem overly concerned
about my not having enough fun.

On 6/11/2011 7:40 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?


It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

Again, do you EVER laugh?

Do you EVER have fun?

For an old and cranky fat guy on a IV drip, you seem overly concerned
about my not having enough fun.



I am young at heart, in absolutely excellent physical condition,
and haven't been on a morphine drip since January when I had my
back surgery. I am very concerned about YOU, however....You just
seem to never derive any fun from life. Do you do anything for fun?
Do you like fishing? Do you go to strip clubs? Exactly what DO
you do for fun?




--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Jun 11, 6:23*am, HVAC wrote:
On 6/11/2011 7:40 AM, Brad Guth wrote:











I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

Again, do you EVER laugh?

Do you EVER have fun?

For an old and cranky fat guy on a IV drip, you seem overly concerned
about my not having enough fun.

I am young at heart, in absolutely excellent physical condition,
and haven't been on a morphine drip since January when I had my
back surgery. I am very concerned about YOU, however....You just
seem to never derive any fun from life. Do you do anything for fun?
Do you like fishing? Do you go to strip clubs? *Exactly what DO
you do for fun?

--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girlhttp://www.youtube..com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

I enjoy helping others, as something that a GOP/ZNR redneck like
yourself has never accomplished. I also fix stuff for others as well
as for myself, unlike your kind that only buys new stuff. So I have
fun without it costing an arm and a leg.

Most commercial sports and other forms of spendy entertainment or
optional spendy and often risky forms of personal recreation I think
should be taxed 100%, so that the other 99.9% of us can afford to have
safe and reasonably affordable fun.

Why should 99.9% of us have to pay for whatever the 0.1% get to do and
get in trouble while doing it?

Obviously you never give an honest tinker damn about others outside of
your upper most 0.1%, as having any spare cash or time for fun.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On 6/11/2011 10:53 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


I enjoy helping others, as something that a GOP/ZNR redneck like
yourself has never accomplished. I also fix stuff for others as well
as for myself, unlike your kind that only buys new stuff. So I have
fun without it costing an arm and a leg.


What kind of stuff do you fix?



Most commercial sports and other forms of spendy entertainment or
optional spendy and often risky forms of personal recreation I think
should be taxed 100%, so that the other 99.9% of us can afford to have
safe and reasonably affordable fun.


So you are in favor of taxing fishing and going to strip clubs?

(FYI Both of those recreational activities are already taxed)


Why should 99.9% of us have to pay for whatever the 0.1% get to do and
get in trouble while doing it?


Like what?



Obviously you never give an honest tinker damn about others outside of
your upper most 0.1%, as having any spare cash or time for fun.


Hey.... Strippers got to make a living too!




--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:15:49 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 11, 3:55*am, HVAC wrote:
On 6/11/2011 6:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote:



So, Mr. all-knowing wise guy spook/mole, tell us why the version of
history that involves JFK, as interpreted and told by William Mook is
wrong.

Who the **** is William Gook?

Real funny, but then aren't all FUD-masters.

I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?

--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

In other words, William Mook's interpretation of what got JFK and RFK
each killed isn't in dispute.

Since no one knows what that "interpretation" consists of,
or what it's based on, how can we know? Knowing you from
your posts, however, I'd venture that it's not in dispute
because it's imaginary.

Here's a suggestion, Sparky: If you'd like to see how *real*
forensic analysis is done, pick up and read the book "Mortal
Error" by Bonar Menninger, ISBN 0-312-08074-3. He makes a
strong argument, based on actual physical evidence,
regarding how JFK died.

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

What's a "ZNR"? And just to satisfy my curiosity, what's
your personal definition of "redneck"?
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

On 6/11/2011 12:57 PM, Bob Casanova wrote:


In other words, William Mook's interpretation of what got JFK and RFK
each killed isn't in dispute.

Since no one knows what that "interpretation" consists of,
or what it's based on, how can we know? Knowing you from
your posts, however, I'd venture that it's not in dispute
because it's imaginary.

Here's a suggestion, Sparky: If you'd like to see how *real*
forensic analysis is done, pick up and read the book "Mortal
Error" by Bonar Menninger, ISBN 0-312-08074-3. He makes a
strong argument, based on actual physical evidence,
regarding how JFK died.

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

What's a "ZNR"? And just to satisfy my curiosity, what's
your personal definition of "redneck"?


I think guth is busy "fixing things".






--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:57:05 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:15:49 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 11, 3:55*am, HVAC wrote:
On 6/11/2011 6:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote:



So, Mr. all-knowing wise guy spook/mole, tell us why the version of
history that involves JFK, as interpreted and told by William Mook is
wrong.

Who the **** is William Gook?

Real funny, but then aren't all FUD-masters.

I'll tell you what's REALLY funny. Kooks like you *never* have
a sense of humor and seemingly take zero pleasure in life.

Why is that, Bradley?

In the words of the Joker....Why so serious?

--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

In other words, William Mook's interpretation of what got JFK and RFK
each killed isn't in dispute.

Since no one knows what that "interpretation" consists of,
or what it's based on, how can we know? Knowing you from
your posts, however, I'd venture that it's not in dispute
because it's imaginary.

Here's a suggestion, Sparky: If you'd like to see how *real*
forensic analysis is done, pick up and read the book "Mortal
Error" by Bonar Menninger, ISBN 0-312-08074-3. He makes a
strong argument, based on actual physical evidence,
regarding how JFK died.

Have you checked this out yet, Sparky?

It's good to know what skulduggery side a devout ZNR redneck like
yourself is on.

What's a "ZNR"? And just to satisfy my curiosity, what's
your personal definition of "redneck"?

[Crickets...]
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless