On Jun 11, 11:38*pm, 69-year-old Vapid City, South Dakotan Gary
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles , a/k/a
and , Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Socialist LOSER Democrat (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:47:13 -0500, Gray Ghost
wrote:

Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ....

Like Reagan?

He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition

Apparently only in the twisted minds of the Kangaroo Court of Leftist
****bags. He was never charged. Are you suggesting that the then Democrat
Congress couldn't get it's collectives dicks out of the asses of 17 yo male
pages long enough to charge and impeach him?

a) It's true he wasn't charged. *The intent of the impeachment clause
is to "Protect" the nation, not to "get" a political enemy. (like
republicans did against clinton)

b) He wasn't charged (impeached) because it would have made more of a
mess of the nation than the republicans had been doing. *He was found
out, he went on TV and admitted he lied, and democrats did not demand
indictment because he was nothing but on old fool

PERJURY

When a person, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal,
officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the U.S. authorizes
an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or
certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition,
or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to
such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not
believe to be true; or in any declaration, certificate, verification,
or statement under penalty of perjury, willfully subscribes as true
any material matter which he does not believe to be true; 18 USC

In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government
must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand
jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person
knew at the time the testimony was false.

The testimony of one witness is not enough to support a finding that
the testimony was false. There must be additional evidence, either the
testimony of another person or other evidence, which tends to support
the testimony of falsity. The other evidence, standing alone, need not
convince that the testimony was false, but all the evidence on the
subject must do so.

-http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p032.htm

OK, Gary; using the above LEGAL definition of "perjury," prove that
Ronaldus Maximus commotted perjury.

Making an assertion is easy for you, Gary; let's see if you are
capable of assembling a criminal case to support that assertion.

Remember, Gary: in order to obtain a conviction you must prove your
case "beyond all reasonable doubt."

"Well; we're WAITING!" -Judge Elihu Smails

"History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth."
--Cicero