Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
On Jun 11, 11:38*pm, 69-year-old Vapid City, South Dakotan Gary
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles , a/k/a and , Left-Wing Lying Liberal Socialist LOSER Democrat (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:47:13 -0500, Gray Ghost wrote: Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness .... Like Reagan? He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition Apparently only in the twisted minds of the Kangaroo Court of Leftist ****bags. He was never charged. Are you suggesting that the then Democrat Congress couldn't get it's collectives dicks out of the asses of 17 yo male pages long enough to charge and impeach him? a) It's true he wasn't charged. *The intent of the impeachment clause is to "Protect" the nation, not to "get" a political enemy. (like republicans did against clinton) b) He wasn't charged (impeached) because it would have made more of a mess of the nation than the republicans had been doing. *He was found out, he went on TV and admitted he lied, and democrats did not demand indictment because he was nothing but on old fool PERJURY When a person, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the U.S. authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; 18 USC In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person knew at the time the testimony was false. The testimony of one witness is not enough to support a finding that the testimony was false. There must be additional evidence, either the testimony of another person or other evidence, which tends to support the testimony of falsity. The other evidence, standing alone, need not convince that the testimony was false, but all the evidence on the subject must do so. -http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p032.htm OK, Gary; using the above LEGAL definition of "perjury," prove that Ronaldus Maximus commotted perjury. Making an assertion is easy for you, Gary; let's see if you are capable of assembling a criminal case to support that assertion. Remember, Gary: in order to obtain a conviction you must prove your case "beyond all reasonable doubt." "Well; we're WAITING!" -Judge Elihu Smails "History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth." --Cicero |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
On 6/12/2011 6:38 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote:
... ROFLOL! As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and fools found the performance acceptable ... raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms! -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
Lamestream rear end asshole MOFOS,,, that sheet BACKFIRED on those
MOFOS! HAW HAW YEEEEEE HAWWWWW,,,,,, Even my doggy is Laughing. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=308949 cuhulin, and doggy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
On Jun 12, 8:41*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/12/2011 6:38 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote: * ... ROFLOL! Since you snipped everything I posted, no one can tell what you find so amusing, Smitty. As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and fools found the performance acceptable ... raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms! Americans rate Reagan best U.S. president By James Hohmann 2/18/11 4:08 PM EST Updated: 2/18/11 4:56 PM EST Gallup, in a poll released Friday, asked 1,015 adults to name the president they regard as the greatest in history. Ronald Reagan finished first at 19 percent, followed by Abraham Lincoln at 14 percent and Bill Clinton at 13 percent. -http://images.politico.com/global/news/110208_reagan_sunshine_605.jpg .... One of three presidents — Lincoln, Reagan or Kennedy — has been on top the past 12 years. .... The poll was conducted from Feb. 2-5. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percent. .... -http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49836.html "History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth." --Cicero |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
On 6/12/2011 7:02 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote:
On Jun 12, 8:41 am, John wrote: On 6/12/2011 6:38 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote: ... ROFLOL! Since you snipped everything I posted, no one can tell what you find so amusing, Smitty. Use a threaded usenet client, will save you from looking like a moron ... As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and fools found the performance acceptable ... raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms! Americans rate Reagan best U.S. president By James Hohmann 2/18/11 4:08 PM EST Updated: 2/18/11 4:56 PM EST Gallup, in a poll released Friday, asked 1,015 adults to name the president they regard as the greatest in history. Ronald Reagan finished first at 19 percent, followed by Abraham Lincoln at 14 percent and Bill Clinton at 13 percent. -http://images.politico.com/global/news/110208_reagan_sunshine_605.jpg ... One of three presidents — Lincoln, Reagan or Kennedy — has been on top the past 12 years. ... The poll was conducted from Feb. 2-5. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percent. ... -http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49836.html "History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth." --Cicero Yeah, I don't believe a word of it, only morons would not recognize that raygun was/is the beginning of everything you now see happening, it was he who tore off all the controls, and in his words, "time to turn the bull loose." Well, now that the bull has destroyed good jobs, decent wages, sufficient retirement, medical, etc. see how you like your new digs! Maybe it is thing with morons, they will live in a dump and count their blessings ... -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
JohnJohnsn wrote in news:7ce5cdec-3367-423d-85a7-
: On Jun 12, 8:41*am, John Smith wrote: On 6/12/2011 6:38 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote: * ... ROFLOL! Since you snipped everything I posted, no one can tell what you find so amusing, Smitty. As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and fools found the performance acceptable ... raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms! Americans rate Reagan best U.S. president By James Hohmann 2/18/11 4:08 PM EST Updated: 2/18/11 4:56 PM EST Gallup, in a poll released Friday, asked 1,015 adults to name the president they regard as the greatest in history. Ronald Reagan finished first at 19 percent, followed by Abraham Lincoln at 14 percent and Bill Clinton at 13 percent. -http://images.politico.com/global/news/110208_reagan_sunshine_605.jpg ... One of three presidents — Lincoln, Reagan or Kennedy — has been on top the past 12 years. ... The poll was conducted from Feb. 2-5. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percent. ... -http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49836.html "History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth." --Cicero Which is why JS lasted about a week before he went in the bozo bin. He's just another asshole searching for some TP. -- Herman Cain for President! http://hermancain.com/ If you don't support him you are a Racist!! He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer) Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as much ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT much competence? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
On Jun 12, 9:20*am, 69-year-old Vapid City, South Dakotan Gary Richard
"Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles , a/k/a and , Left-Wing Lying Liberal Socialist LOSER Democrat™ (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate, wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn wrote: In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person knew at the time the testimony was false. You're talking indictment under the criminal code Pay close attention here, Gary: "In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person knew at the time the testimony was false." What is your evidence to prove that, IF, as you claim, Reagan made false statements to a grand jury, that he KNEW the statements were false. GOTCHA! snicker Whether or not someone is indicted, doesn't mean that the act didn't happen. You still offer ZERO proof, Gary; just more unsupported assertions. In the case of Reagan, he cannot be indicted until removed from office using the impeachment clause. First: Ronald Wilson Reagan died at his home in Bel Air, California on the afternoon of Saturday, June 5, 2004, so why in the world are you writing in the present tense??? Second: Care to show ANY statute that prevents the indictment, prosecution and conviction of a sitting POTUS? Third: Ronald Reagan's approval ratings: Ronald Reagan From the People’s Perspective: A Gallup Poll Review March 18-20, 2002 Approval: 73% Disapproval: 22% No Opinion: 5% -http://media.gallup.com/POLL/Releases/pr040607iii.gif -http://media.gallup.com/POLL/Releases/pr040607iv.gif "The People have spoken." He can be impeached, then prosecuted {GIC} He can finish his term, then be indicted Evidence? In reagan's case, the evidence of perjury were contained in Grand Jury depositions where all, or most, of the deposed witnesses in the John Pointdexter issue swore under oath that Reagan testified (under oath) falsely, that he did know about the ongoing Iran-Contra schemes, sat in on meetings, and gave permission Reagan also lied to congress Reagan lied to The public. In either case, no impeachment because doing so did not fit the "clear and present danger" test; What "clear and present danger test"? The Constitution of the United States Article II - The Executive Branch Section 4 - Disqualification The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Don't find "clear and present danger" here, Gary. ...*and because the poor sap was nothing more than a drooling idiot by the time he was in his last years. I didn't see any evidence of his being " drooling idiot" while he was in office, Gary; unlike you who demonstrate almost daily to your being a "droolong Yoorghis IDIOT." However: The Case For Obama’s Impeachment : Obama Clear And Present Danger! -http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/05/25/the-case-for-obamas- impeachment "If Ignorance is Bliss, then Lying Left-Wing Liberal Socialist Gary Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles must be in Nirvana" "I found my friends / They're in my head " --Gary Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
How do you know? You ever drove around Missy Sippy before?
http://www.visitmississippi.org They will snail mail you some freeby (freebie) (a Big Package) literature stuff to look at (and a DVD too, I think), if you ask them to. I finally got around to cleaning out my old microwave oven, you talk about Eweeeeeeee,,,,,,, It was made in 1982, it only has a 15 minutes timer and an ON OFF thingy on it, you should have seen it.I worked it over in my back yard, letting it dry out real good now.I cleaned it real good with an old sock and Dawn detergent and Tide detergent and water, then I rinsed it out with my water hose.I am scared to plug it in and turn it on, it might BLOW UP! Very long Luna Eclispe is coming. http://www.drudgereport.org VERRA. Every time I turn on my vacuum cleaner, doggy runs and gets her rubber squeaky doggy toy and drops it by my vacuum cleaner.She thinks the vacuum cleaner wants to play football. cuhulin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
Crash at LeMans
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=308980 Scottish Driver Allan McNish. cuhulin |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails | Shortwave | |||
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat | Shortwave | |||
(OT) Senate Seat on eBay | Shortwave | |||
Need help wiring a slip seat box | CB | |||
Down with seat belts: (Was: Where Did THIS Come From) | Policy |